Pararrhopalites iataganii, Souza & Medeiros & Bento & Zeppelini & Bellini, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5474.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8195C49D-7E8A-4363-9F43-0268144AA946 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12567653 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/50728799-0C34-4C26-B9C0-6FD4FD26FB6F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pararrhopalites iataganii |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pararrhopalites iataganii sp. nov. Souza, Medeiros & Zeppelini
Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 , 8–12 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12 , Table 2 View TABLE 2
Type material. Holotype male in slide: Brazil, Rio Grande do Norte State, Baraúna, Furna Nova Cave (05°02’03.8”S; 37°34’15.8”W), Aphotic zone, 18/VII/2022, Souza, P.G.C, Santos, N. M. C., Lima, E. C. A., Bento, D. M., Freitas, J. I. M. coll. ( CC / UFRN) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 4 females in slides, same data of holotype ( CC / UFRN) GoogleMaps ; 2 females in slides, same data of holotype except ( CRFS / UEPB); and GoogleMaps 3 males, 2 females and 1 juvenile in slides, same data of holotype except 18/VIII/2022 ( CC / UFRN) GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. Specimens pale yellow, some individuals with scattered red pigment on dorsal head and body. Antennae shorter than the body length, Ant. IV with 12 subsegments. Eyes 1+1, head interantennal area with 3 reduced, apically rounded sensilla, frontal area with 13 spines. Parafurcal area with 12 chaetae. Ungues without tunica, with a pair of lateral teeth. Manubrium with 6+6 dorsal chaetae, dens with 23 dorsal (posterior) and 9 ventral (anterior) chaetae, ventral formula from the apex to the basis as: 3, 2, 2, 1…1. Mucronal chaeta absent.
Description. Body (head + trunk) average length of the type series 0.75 mm (0.5–1.1 mm), holotype with 0.64 mm, males averaging 0.57 mm (0.5–0.67 mm) (n=4), females averaging 0.83 mm (0.65–1.1 mm) (n=4). Specimens usually pale ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ), some individuals with scattered red pigment on the dorsal head and large abdomen.
Antennal length in holotype 0.75 mm. Antennal segments ratio I: II: III: IV of the holotype as 1: 2.5: 5.3: 11.5. Ant. IV shorter than body length ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ). Ant. IV with 12 subsegments, subsegments 1–12 with 4/6/6/7/8/10/10/10/ 10/10/10/26 chaetae, respectively; subsegment 12 with one curved chaeta and one small sensillum at the apex ( Fig. 9A View FIGURE 9 ). Ant. III with 21 chaetae plus one short sensillum (Aai) laterally to the sensory organ; apical organ sensory rods in independent shallow invaginations ( Fig. 9B View FIGURE 9 ). Ant. II with 15 chaetae, 4 of them spine-like, plus 1 rounded apical microsensillum ( Fig. 9C View FIGURE 9 ). Ant. I with 7 chaetae ( Fig. 9C View FIGURE 9 ). Eyes 1+1, unpigmented. Clypeal area a–g series with 6/6/4/4(+1)/5(+1)/4(+1)/3 chaetae, respectively, 1 chaeta present or absent between series d and e; interantennal area with 1 oval organ and 3 reduced, apically rounded sensilla, α and γ series with 1 chaeta each, frontal area A–E series with 2/1/2/2(+1)/2 chaetae, respectively, with a total of 13 frontal spines ( Fig. 9D View FIGURE 9 ). Ventral head with 3 a and 1 b chaetae on the post-labial region, plus 3 elongate oval organs, labial basomedian field with 7 and basolateral field with 2 chaetae, respectively ( Fig. 9E View FIGURE 9 ). Six prelabral chaetae present ( Fig. 9D View FIGURE 9 ), labral p, m, a series with 5, 5, 4 chaetae, respectively, p2 longer than the others; m0 smaller than m1, labral intrusions present, labral papillae absent ( Fig. 9F View FIGURE 9 ). Labial palp with 5 proximal chaetae, with 6 papillae, formula of the guards as: H (2), A (0), B (5), C (0), D (3), E (4) + a lateral process not reaching the apex of the papilla E, 1 papilla B guard-chaeta laterally displaced to C, large, curved and blunt ( Fig. 9G View FIGURE 9 ). Maxillary outer lobe apical chaeta with a basal toothlet, basal chaeta shorter than the apical one, oral fold with 2 chaetae, sublobal plate without chaeta-like appendages ( Fig. 9H View FIGURE 9 ). Mandibles asymmetrical with 5 + 3 apical teeth ( Fig. 9I View FIGURE 9 ). Maxillae globular, without any clear modifications ( Fig. 9J View FIGURE 9 ).
Large abdomen without clear segmentation, constrictions or vesicles. DI-1 row of dorsal spines present on females, absent on males ( Figs 10A–B View FIGURE 10 ). Th. II with 1 a chaeta and 1 m spine. Th. III with 1 a chaeta, 1 m and 1 p spines. Abd. I with 1 chaeta and 1 spine on a and m rows, and 3 p spines. Bothriotricha A, B and C present on Abd. II, slightly misaligned, nearly in a straight line; Abd. II with 2 chaetae, 1 spine on a row, plus bothriotrichum A; 3 chaetae and 1 spine on m row, plus bothriotrichum B; and 5 chaetae on p row, plus bothriotrichum C. Abd. III–IV with 7 chaetae under the bothriotrichum C. Abd. III–IV dorsal spine rows dI-1 with 9 spines in females, row absent in males; dII-1 with 6 spines in females and 8 in males; dIII-1 with 7 spines in females and 6 in males; dIV-1 with 5 spines in females and 4 in males; and dV-1 with 8 in females and 7 in males ( Figs 10A–B View FIGURE 10 ). Parafurcal area with 12 chaetae in both sexes, distributed in 4 rows of 2, 4, 3 and 3 chaetae ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ). Bothriotrichum D present on the small abdomen of both sexes, with 4 accessory chaetae on females and 3 on males ( Figs 10C–D View FIGURE 10 ). Female dorsal anal valve with as2–4, ams1–3, ms1–3, mps1–3 and ps1–2 chaetae, ams1, ms1 and ps1 unpaired; each ventral anal valve with aai1–3, ai1–4, mi1–2, mpi1–5 and pi1–3 chaetae, ami1 as an oval organ, mi2 bothriotrichum-like and mpi5 as the subanal appendage, smooth and curved towards the anal opening ( Fig. 10C View FIGURE 10 ). Male dorsal anal valve with as2–4, ams1–3, ms1–3, mps1, mps3, and ps1–2 chaetae, ams1, ms1 and ps1 unpaired; each ventral anal valve with aai1–2, ai1–4, mi1–2, mpi1–5 and pi1–3 chaetae, ami1 as an oval organ, mi2 bothriotrichum-like ( Fig. 10D View FIGURE 10 ). Female genital plate with 2+2 chaetae on ventral side ( Fig. 10E View FIGURE 10 ). Male genital plate with about 10+10 chaetae ( Fig. 10F View FIGURE 10 ).
Legs ( Figs 11 View FIGURE 11 , 12A–C View FIGURE 12 ): Epicoxae I–III with 1, 1 and 2 chaetae, respectively. Subcoxa I–III with 0, 1 and 1 chaetae, respectively. Coxae I–III with 1, 2 and 4 chaetae, respectively. Trochanters I–III with 5, 3–5 and 6 chaetae, respectively, trochanter III with one chaeta modified into a thick and bent metatrochanteral spine, trochanters II–III with 1 and 1–2 oval organs, respectively. Femora I–III with 14, 14, 15 chaetae and 1, 1, 1 oval organs, respectively ( Figs 11A–C View FIGURE 11 ). Tibiotarsi I–III with 54, 51, 54 chaetae and 3, 3, 3 oval organs, respectively, distal whorl with 9 chaetae on each leg ( Figs 11D–F View FIGURE 11 ). Foot complexes I–III with 2 pretarsal chaetae each, one of them larger than the other ( Figs 12A–C View FIGURE 12 ). Ungues without tunica, with a single medial inner tooth (larger on unguis III), 2 paired small lateral teeth and 1 dorsal tooth (not seen in unguis III, possibly reduced or absent). Unguiculus I without teeth, unguiculi II–III with a small inner tooth, apical filament slightly surpassing the apex of unguis on leg I, reaching the apex on leg II but not reaching the apex on leg III ( Figs 12A–C View FIGURE 12 ).
Abdominal appendages ( Figs 12D–G View FIGURE 12 ): Collophore with 0+0 or 1+1 chaetae on the lateral flaps, corpus without chaetae. Tenaculum ramus with 3 teeth plus an apically rounded basal appendix, corpus with 1–2 apical chaetae. Manubrium with 6+6 chaetae, all dorsal, one larger than the others ( Fig. 12D View FIGURE 12 ). Dens dorsally (posteriorly) with 23 chaetae, lines E / PE / P / PJ / J with 7/2/1/7/6 chaetae, respectively ( Fig. 12E View FIGURE 12 ), ventrally (anteriorly) with 9 chaetae following the formula from the apex to the basis: 3, 2, 2, 1…1 ( Fig. 12F View FIGURE 12 ). Mucronal lamellae serrated, inner lamella with about 30, outer lamella with about 16 teeth; mucronal chaeta absent ( Fig. 12G View FIGURE 12 ). Ratio manubrium:dens:mucro of the holotype as 1: 3.3: 1.4.
Etymology. The new species honors our dear friend, the biospeleologist José Iatagan Mendes de Freitas, for his indispensable work at the Furna Feia National Park, Rio Grande do Norte, and all other contributions with the National Center for Cave Research and Conservation (CECAV/ICMBio) in prospecting and mapping new caves through Brazil.
Remarks. The combination of Ant. IV with 12 subsegments, 1+1 eyes, head interantennal area with 3 apically rounded sensilla and frontal area with 13 spines, ungues with a pair of lateral teeth, manubrium with 6 dorsal chaetae, dens with 23 dorsal chaetae, with ventral chaetotaxy formula as 3, 2, 2, 1…1, and mucro without chaeta sets Pararrhopalites iataganii sp. nov. apart from all its congeners. Considering the number of eyes (1+1), the new species resembles other Neotropical taxa like P. queirozi Brito, Lima & Zeppelini, 2019 , P. sideroicus Zeppelini & Brito, 2014 and P. wallacei (Zeppelini & Palacios-Vargas, 1995) . However, P. iataganii sp. nov. can be readily separated from them by: Ant. IV with 12 subsegments (vs. 11 or less in the other species), frontal head with 13 spines (15 in P. queirozi , 10 in P. sideroicus and P. wallacei ), 1 frontal cephalic oval organ (2 in P. sideroicus ), manubrium with 6 dorsal chaetae (less in P. queirozi and P. sideroicus , unknown to P. wallacei ), and dens dorsally with 23 chaetae (less in the other species). Further comparisons between the Neotropical species of the genus are summarized in Table 2 View TABLE 2 .
The reduction of pigment and eyes (just 1+1) may be considered troglomorphic traits of P. iataganii sp. nov., since most species of Pararrhopalites have 2+2 or more eyes and at least some of them are pigmented ( Zeppelini & Brito 2014). On the other hand, the species does not show any clear elongation of appendages, ungues or chaetae, features observed as troglomorphisms in some cave Collembola ( Christiansen 1961, 1988; Souza et al. 2022). Specimens of P. iataganii sp. nov. were only found in the aphotic zone of Furna Nova cave, even though other zones of the cave and its aboveground surroundings were investigated.
Habitat, threats and conservation status. Furna Nova cave stands as the exclusive documented habitat of P. iataganii sp. nov., although other caves and surface environments in the region have been surveyed. The cave has relatively large dimensions for the region, with approximately 240 meters of passages mapped thus far, while certain sections remain unexplored ( Fig. 1D View FIGURE 1 ). Notably, the cave features only one small entrance, fostering a stable microclimate characterized by relatively high temperature and humidity levels, alongside limited air circulation. Seasonal occurrences of elevated carbon dioxide concentration are observed at lower cave levels, including areas where individuals of P. iataganii sp. nov. were collected.
The cave primarily maintains occasional drips and small puddles observed in its lower sections. Consequently, the principal organic resources for cave fauna predominantly comprise guano patches, primarily deposited by the hematophagous bats Desmodus rotundus and Diphylla ecaudata , the Brazilian funnel-eared bat Natalus macrourus (Gervais) , an insectivore, and the omnivorous bat Phyllostomus discolor ( Vargas-Mena et al. 2018) .
Furna Nova cave is situated within the Furna Feia National Park, designated in 2012 to safeguard a notable cluster of caves and the biodiversity of the Caatinga biome ( Brasil 2012). While the area of the National Park itself is well conserved, its periphery has undergone substantial changes, mainly due to irrigated agriculture. Nonetheless, these anthropogenic influences are situated at a considerable distance from the cave and do not seem to exert any discernible impact on its subterranean environments.
Furna Nova is among the caves within the Furna Feia National Park slated for tourism. However, these visits will be conducted in an organized manner and based on studies that have considered the significance and uniqueness of its cave fauna. Notably, the lower cave level, where P. iataganii sp. nov. is found, will be off-limits to visitors, and there are plans for monitoring the bat community. Consequently, the newly discovered species could potentially be classified as Least Concern (LC) according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s method for assessing the risk of extinction ( IUCN 2022).
CC |
CSIRO Canberra Rhizobium Collection |
UFRN |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |