Aphaniosoma proximum Ebejer, 1998
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.872.2131 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:05098E38-AB11-486E-8F28-8567DE6BC19C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8018515 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/505487F2-B0C5-FF57-FDF3-FBFA099E3CEE |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Aphaniosoma proximum Ebejer, 1998 |
status |
|
Aphaniosoma proximum Ebejer, 1998 View in CoL
Remarks
This species has much in common with A. notatum and A. scutellare . Being variable in colour pattern adds to the difficulty of identification of species in this complex. The pregenital sternite of A. proximum usually has 2 projecting lobes. The barely noticeable posterior lobes arising from the postero-lateral corners of the sternite just beyond those that project ventrally and arise from the lateral border of the sternite. Basally, the sternite is divided into two more or less rectangular sclerotized parts ( Ebejer 1998: 220, fig. 64). In A. scutellare , the posterior projections are not much shorter than those proximal to them and the basal part of the sclerite is complete and irregularly hexagonal ( Ebejer 1998: 222, figs 69–70). In both species the sternite is much smaller than that in A. gallagheri , which has a deep U-shaped apical incision and much longer antero-ventrally directed projections from the lateral margins at its caudal end ( Ebejer 2009: 401, fig. 46a–b).
Distribution
Italy (Sardinia and Sicily), Malta, Morocco, Romania, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates ( Ebejer 1998, 2005, 2016; Ebejer & Bartak 2019).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |