Myotis riparius Handley, 1960
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4545052 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618160 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4F19FC10-FF02-FF32-FCC5-27FAFB2B8D1B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Myotis riparius Handley |
status |
|
Myotis riparius Handley View in CoL
Figures 57 View Fig , 58 View Fig
VOUCHER MATERIAL: 6 females (AMNH *267224, *267524, *268591, *268592; MNHN *1995.946, *1995.947) and 6 males (AMNH *266366, *266376, *267523, *268589; MNHN *1995.948, *1995.949); see table 57 for measurements.
IDENTIFICATION: As noted above, identification of species of Neotropical Myotis requires reference to LaVal (1973). Descriptions and measurements of Myotis riparius can also be found in Handley (1960) and Brosset and CharlesDominique (1990). No subspecies of M. riparius are currently recognized (Koopman, 1994).
Our specimens of Myotis riparius conform to the description provided by LaVal (1973). A sagittal crest is present in all individuals, although it is poorly developed in two specimens; P3 is less than onefourth the height of P4 in all individuals with both teeth (P3 is missing in one individual); and P3 is shift ed to the inside of the toothrow in 64% of our specimens. Most of our specimens of M. riparius have woolly brown dorsal fur and slightly lighter ventral fur. However, some individuals have fur that is silkier in texture, and one specimen (clearly adult based on epiphyseal fusion) is graybrown with slightly darker underparts. Measurements of our material resemble those reported by Brosset and CharlesDominique (1990) for French Guianan M. riparius , although our larger series exhibits somewhat more size variation (table 57).
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: We made 12 vouchered captures of Myotis riparius at Paracou: 11 individuals were taken in groundlevel mistnets and 1 was shot as it flew back and forth in a regular beat about 5 m above a narrow dirt road at night. Of the 11 groundlevel mistnet captures, 5 were in welldrained primary forest, 4 were in swampy primary forest, 1 was in creekside primary forest, and 1 was in a manmade clearing.
The observed habitat difference in groundlevel mistnet capture frequencies between Myotis nigricans and M. riparius is noteworthy despite the rather small numbers of vouchered captures available for comparison (table 58). Apparently, M. nigricans favors clearings whereas M. riparius is more commonly found beneath the primary forest canopy. To our knowledge, ecological differences between sympatric populations of these species have not previously been reported in the literature, possibly due to the difficulty of field identification.
In addition to the vouchered captures of Myotis nigricans and M. riparius reported above, we recorded five unvouchered captures of Myotis in groundlevel mistnets over roadside puddles. These bats were identified in the field as representing either M. nigricans or M. riparius , but were released without adequate confirmation of identification.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |