Adelopsis benardi, (Portevin, 1923: 380), 1963
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4741.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2F901615-D948-4C68-81E9-75282F594BAF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4457624 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4E4F5B3F-FFD6-8776-FF75-C90DFB17F378 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Adelopsis benardi |
status |
|
A. benardi ( Portevin, 1923: 380) View in CoL
(Ptomaphagus) (as 1823 [sic] in Jeannel, 1936: 65); Jeannel, 1936: 65 (not stated as taxonomic change, because he did not mention the species was not described under Adelopsis View in CoL ) [but see Note 2]; Gnaspini, 1996: 539 (holotype seen); Salgado, 2010c: 213 (assignment to group); Gnaspini & Peck, 2019: 27 (holotype seen; assignment to subgroup). Holotype male [a single specimen in original description, assumed as holotype] in MNHN [in original description—i.e., only 1 male examined; but Gnaspini, 1996 examined an additional female labeled “type”].
Type locality: “? Teresópolis”, [Rio de Janeiro State], Brazil.
Distribution: Brazil: Rio de Janeiro State: (probably) known only from type locality.
Note 1: Jeannel, 1936: 66 lists type as “Teresópolis?” and then lists material examined as “Teresópolis” (without the “?”); but the type label indeed reads “Theresopolis?” ( Gnaspini & Peck, 2019).
Note 2: Jeannel, 1936: 66 adds a record in São Paulo State ( Brazil) in ZMUH, probably a doubtful record since it refers to a female.
Note 3: Szymczakowski NMPC specimen ( Brazil: São Paulo) (as in Szymczakowski, 1963: 670, as? ber- nardi [sic], with a redescription) actually belongs to a different species (Gnaspini, 1996: 540). It refers to A. szymczakowskii ( Gnaspini & Peck, 2019: 29, 32).
Note 4: The records in Salgado, 2005d: 969 (as bernardi [sic]), 2015b: 33 (as bernardi [sic]) ( Brazil: Santa Catarina and Paraguay) are considered doubtful/erroneous ( Gnaspini & Peck, 2019: 29).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Catopocerinae |
Tribe |
Ptomaphagini |
SubTribe |
Ptomaphagina |
Genus |