Scotocryptus meliponae, Girard, 1874: 124
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4741.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2F901615-D948-4C68-81E9-75282F594BAF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3797265 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4E4F5B3F-FFAC-870F-FF75-CBBEFEEFF54B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Scotocryptus meliponae |
status |
|
S. meliponae Girard, 1874: 124 View in CoL
(just a communication); 1875 (1874): 576 (description); Wasmann, 1904: 484; Portevin, 1907: 81; Peck, 2003a: 76 (redescription).
Syntypes (3 specimens, sex and depository not given in original description) in MNHN [in Peck, 2003a, cotypes not seen].
Type locality: “environs de Bahia” [State], Brazil [as “ Guyana ”, in error, in Portevin, 1907: 81].
Distribution: Brazil: Bahia (also obscurus ), and Pará ( goeldii ) States; Colombia: Magdalena Department; Panama: Panamá Province. Trinidad. Biology: Portevin, 1907: 81; Wasmann, 1904: 483; Salt, 1929: 435; Peck, 2003a: 76. Larvae: Wheeler, 1985: 1083.
Note: The record in Portevin, 1903b: 336, 1907: 81 ( Mexico: Jalisco State) is a misidentification of S. digueti Portevin [1937] ( Portevin, 1937: 35) .
= S. obscurus Sharp, 1885 View in CoL : xxii; Portevin, 1907: 81 syn. (not stated as taxonomic change); Hatch in Salt, 1929: 451; Hatch, 1936: 40 – 41 (cotype seen; resurrecting species from synonomy, but see Note); Peck, 2003a: 76 (holotype seen). No information about types in original description; Holotype, sex not given, in BMNH [in Peck, 2003a]. Type locality: “Bahia” [State, Brazil]. Note: Although Hatch (1936: 41) states that “The species may well be retained as distinct until more specimens ...”, this seems to have been overlooked in the literature—both Roubik & Wheeler (1982: 127, in Table 1) and Peck (2003a: 76) treat S. obscurus View in CoL as junior synonym of S. meliponae View in CoL ; and this view is maintained here.
= S. goeldii Wasmann, 1900: 411, 1904: 484 View in CoL ; Portevin, 1907: 81; Hatch, 1929b: 83 syn. (not stated as taxonomic change, and given as “?”). No information about types in original description; Syntypes (2 specimens, sex not given) in ZMHB(?) [doubt as in Peck et al., 1998a: 52] or NHME(?). Type locality: “ Pará ” [State, Brazil].
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Coloninae |
Tribe |
Scotocryptini |
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Scotocryptus |
Scotocryptus meliponae
Peck, Stewart B., Gnaspini, Pedro & Newton, Alfred F. 2020 |
S. goeldii
Peck, S. B. & Gnaspini, P. & Newton, A. F. 1998: 52 |
Hatch, M. H. 1929: 83 |
Portevin, G. 1907: 81 |
Wasmann, E. 1904: 484 |
Wasmann, E. 1900: 411 |
S. meliponae
Peck, S. B. 2003: 76 |
Peck, S. B. 2003: 76 |
Wheeler, Q. D. 1985: 1083 |
Salt, G. 1929: 435 |
Portevin, G. 1907: 81 |
Portevin, G. 1907: 81 |
Portevin, G. 1907: 81 |
Wasmann, E. 1904: 484 |
Wasmann, E. 1904: 483 |
Girard, M. 1874: 124 |