Amritodus brevis Viraktamath
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5462.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:64145254-E820-4248-8248-F5B259266592 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11610745 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4D73DA02-FF83-FFCF-FF17-FC32E8BDFA23 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Amritodus brevis Viraktamath |
status |
|
Amritodus brevis Viraktamath View in CoL
Figs 9A–H View FIGURES 9 , 60J View FIGURES 60 , 63M–P View FIGURES 63 .
Amritodus brevis Viraktamath 1997: 115–116 View in CoL , figs 32–41; Xue & Zhang 2020: 1446–1447, figs 4A–D, 13A–G.
Diagnosis. Male subgenital plate short about half as long as pygofer. Male style with apex not curved, setae on dorsal surface thinner and numerous. Aedeagus strongly sinuate in lateral view, preatrium slightly longer than shaft, shaft with pair of subapical triangular processes. Female sternite VII 4× as wide as medially long, lateral margins almost straight, lateral lobes directed posteriorly, posterior median margin with one additional lobe on either side of median line ( Fig. 60J View FIGURES 60 ).
Material examined. HOLOTYPPE ♂, INDIA: Mizoram: Silchar, Gunghur , 18.xi.1981, C.S. Wesley Coll. ( UASB). Paratype 1♀, data as for holotype ( UASB).
Remarks. Viraktamath (1997) adequately described the species and also illustrated the male genitalia. Xue et al. (2020) diagnosed the species and illustrated the male and female genitalia based on specimens collected from China.
UASB |
University of Agricultural Sciences |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Amritodus brevis Viraktamath
VIRAKTAMATH, C. A. & YESHWANTH, H. M. 2024 |
Amritodus brevis
Xue, Q. Q. & Zhang, Y. L. 2020: 1446 |