Ghatiana durrelli, Pati & Thackeray, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/zoosystema2021v43a26 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:24B254A2-36F7-4DA7-B5C8-9D0EE5DBA85B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5600399 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/ED5952DC-3544-434B-ADD6-CEC5BE37DF67 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:ED5952DC-3544-434B-ADD6-CEC5BE37DF67 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ghatiana durrelli |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ghatiana durrelli View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs 1 View FIG A-D; 2 View FIG A-H; 3 View FIG A, B)
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:ED5952DC-3544-434B-ADD6-CEC5BE37DF67
TYPE MATERIAL. — Holotype. India • ♂ (CW 19.53 mm, CL 13.19 mm, CH 9.38 mm, FW 7.19 mm); Maharashtra: Satara district: Ramban Trail, Koyna Wildlife Sanctuary ; 17°25’58”N, 73°42’32”E; alt. 940 m; 1.VII.2017; Tejas Thackeray leg.; ZSI-WRC C.1999 . GoogleMaps
Paratypes. India • 3 ♂ ( CW 14.18-17.84 mm, CL 9.17-12.22 mm, CH 6.01-7.86 mm, FW 5.42-6.83 mm); 3 ♀ ( CW 16.06-22.83 mm, CL 10.66-15.04 mm, CH 7.46-10.64 mm, FW 6.06-8.40 mm); same data as for holotype; ZSI-WRC C.2000 GoogleMaps .
OTHER MATERIAL. — India • ♂ ( CW 13.77 mm, CL 9.45 mm, CH 5.96 mm, FW 5.08 mm), 2 ♀ ( CW 18.91-21.89 mm, CL 12.64- 14.51 mm, CH 8.66-9.78 mm, FW 6.82-7.46 mm); Maharashtra: Kolhapur district: Kokan Darshan Point, Masnoli village , c. 5 km south of Amba ; 16°55’22”N, 73°47’45”E; alt. 840 m; 15.VII.2020; Tejas Thackeray leg.; ZSI-WRC C.2001 GoogleMaps .
TYPE LOCALITY. — India: Maharashtra: Satara district: RambanTrail, Koyna Wildlife Sanctuary; 17°25’58.8”N, 73°42’32.4”E; alt. 940 m.
DIAGNOSIS. — Carapace in adult proportionately narrow (CW/ CL = 1.5), moderately to strongly arched ( CH /CL = 0.6-0.7); lateral margins strongly convex; anterolateral margins relatively short, cristate; epibranchial tooth visible as weak notch; branchial regions slightly rugose; frontal margin some distance from anterior margin of epistome, exposing antennular fossae ( Fig. 1 View FIG A-C). First, second maxillipeds with long flagellum on exopod; third maxilliped lacking flagellum on exopod ( Fig. 2A View FIG ). Major chela with pointed fingertips; palm in adult male relatively stout; ventral margin of fixed finger and distal half of palm in adult male strongly concave ( Figs 1A, D View FIG ; 2B View FIG ). Ambulatory legs relatively long (P3 length/CL = c. 2.3) ( Fig. 1A View FIG ). Male pleonal somite 6 subquadrate, slightly broader than long ( Figs 1D View FIG ; 2C View FIG ). Male telson elongated ( Figs 1D View FIG ; 2C View FIG ). G1 relatively slender, almost straight; terminal segment relatively stout, distally gently curved inwards, relatively long, c. 0.5 times length of subterminal segment; subterminal segment relatively slender ( Fig. 2D, E View FIG ). G2 very short, with very short distal segment ( Fig. 2F View FIG ). Female pleon in adult broadly subtriangular ( Fig. 2G View FIG ). Vulvae in adult positioned apart from each other (VD/SW = c. 0.3), each subovate in shape, relatively large, occupying c. 0.4 times length of S6, positioned close to S5/S6 ( Fig. 2H View FIG ).
ETYMOLOGY. — The species name honours British naturalist, Gerald Malcolm Durrell for his in situ and ex situ conservation efforts. The specific epithet is thus conceived as a noun in the genitive singular.
COLOUR IN LIFE. — The crabs show colour variations. They are generally fluorescent red dorsally ( Fig. 3A View FIG ) and relatively paler ventrally. Some crabs are reddish brown dorsally ( Fig. 3B View FIG ).
ECOLOGICAL NOTES. — Ghatiana durrelli n. sp. is a nocturnal crab and is found in tree trunk holes and in holes or crevices of laterite rocks (locally known as “Jambha”). The species occurs at elevated mountains (840-940 m altitude). Some individuals were observed feeding on dead millipedes.
GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION. — Ghatiana durrelli n. sp. is currently known only from two localities of Maharashtra state (Kolhapur and Satara districts), India. Both the localities are situated in the Western Ghats.
REMARKS
Ghatiana durrelli n. sp. most closely resembles to G. aurantiaca (type species) mainly due to the proportionately narrower adult carapace [CW/CL = 1.5 in G. durrelli n. sp. ( Fig. 1A, B View FIG ); CW/CL = 1.4 in G. aurantiaca (see Pati & Sharma 2014: fig. 2A; Pati & Thackeray 2018: fig. 4A)], the exposed fossae due to the gap between the frontal margin and the anterior margin of the epistome ( Fig. 1C View FIG ; see Pati & Sharma 2014: fig. 2B; Pati & Thackeray 2018: fig. 4B), and an almost straight G1 ( Fig. 2D, E View FIG ; see Pati & Sharma 2014: fig. 3E, F; Pati & Thackeray 2018: fig. 4D, E). Ghatiana durrelli n. sp., however, is differentiated from G. aurantiaca by the relatively broader male pleonal somite 6 ( Figs 1D View FIG ; 2C View FIG ) (vs male pleonal somite 6 as long as broad; see Pati & Sharma 2014: figs 2C, 3B; Pati & Thackeray 2018: fig. 4C), the relatively stouter G1 terminal segment ( Fig. 2D, E View FIG ) (vs G1 terminal segment relatively slenderer; see Pati & Sharma 2014: fig. 3E-G; Pati & Thackeray 2018: fig. 4D, E), the relatively slenderer G1 subterminal segment ( Fig. 2D, E View FIG ) (vs G1 subterminal segment relatively stouter; see Pati & Sharma 2014: fig. 3E, F; Pati & Thackeray 2018: fig. 4D, E), and the relatively closely positioned adult vulva in relation to S5/S6 ( Fig. 2H View FIG ) (vs adult vulva positioned a clear distance from S5/S6; see Pati & Thackeray 2018: fig. 4H).
Among congeners, the stout G1 terminal segment is unique in G. durrelli n. sp. and G. pulchra Pati & Thackeray, 2018 ( Fig. 2D View FIG ; see Pati & Thackeray 2018: fig. 8I, J). In fact, the G1 structure of G. durrelli n. sp. is almost identical to that of G. pulchra except for the gently inwardly curved terminal segment ( Fig. 2D View FIG ) (vs straight G1 terminal segment in G. pulchra ; see Pati & Thackeray 2018: fig. 8I, J). Ghatiana durrelli n. sp. can nevertheless be separated from G. pulchra by the proportionately narrower adult carapace, CW/CL = 1.5 ( Fig. 1A, B View FIG ) (vs proportionately broader adult carapace, CW/CL = 1.6; see Pati & Thackeray 2018: fig. 8A), the strongly concave ventral margin of the fixed finger and the distal half of the palm of the major chela in adult males ( Fig. 2B View FIG ) (vs gently concave ventral margin of the fixed finger and the distal half of the palm of the major chela in adult males; see Pati & Thackeray 2018: fig. 8D), and the relatively longer ambulatory legs, P3 length/CL = c. 2.3 ( Fig. 1A View FIG ) (vs the relatively shorter ambulatory legs, P3 length/CL = c. 2.0; see Pati & Thackeray 2018: fig. 8A).
CH |
Circulo Herpetologico de Panama |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |