Hydrochus brianbrowni Makhan
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4974.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1BD6220B-7540-4A12-B3D2-5EDC1A3B7DD8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4777906 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4772526A-0044-FFC0-FF18-28DC108032FC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hydrochus brianbrowni Makhan |
status |
|
Hydrochus brianbrowni Makhan View in CoL
Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 , 9 View FIGURES 9–10 , 31 View FIGURES 31–33
Hydrochus brianbrowni Makhan 2005: 63 View in CoL .
Originally described from southern Arizona. New locality data records for Mexico are given below
Material examined (52): Mexico: Baja California, Arroyo Saltito nr. Las Cruces, E. of La Paz , 23.i.1959, leg. H. B. Leech (1 CAS) ; Baja California Sur, 9 mi. up Canyon San Bernardo fr. Boca de la Sierra (Potrero), elev. 457 m (23°23’N, 109°57’W), 2.viii.1971, leg. H. G. Real & R. E. Main (1 FSCA, 37 CAS); GoogleMaps Sa. Victoria , 7 mi. W Santiago, (23°28’N, 109°50’W), 30-31.x.1968, leg. E. L. Sleeper & F. J. Moore (1 CAS) GoogleMaps ; Jalisco, Mpio. Tomatlán, Cajón de Peñas , 120 m, 15.vi.1994, G. Nogueira col. (1 IEXA) ; Quintana Roo, Pto . Morelos, 29.iv.1982, leg. O. Comul (1 UNAM) ; San Luis Potosi, 2 mi. S. San Luis Potosi, 21.xi.1948, leg. H. B. Leech (1 CAS) ; Sinaloa, Los Mochis , 8.vii.1922, leg. C.T. Dodds (1 CAS) ; Sonora, 20 mi. W. Moctezuma , 28.ix.1980, leg. no collector on label (2 NMNH) ; 7 mi. SE Alamos , 27.xi.1971, leg. K. Stephan (2 NMNH) ; La Pintada , 6.xi.1986, leg. F. Arias (3 UNAM) ; Zacatecas, Teul de Gonzalez Ortega, Huitzila ; borde arroyo, elev. 1718 m (21°36’46.1’’N, 103°36’22.2’’W), 31.i.2004, leg. V.Gomez & J.L. Navarrete-Heredia (1 NMNH) GoogleMaps .
Differential diagnosis. Among Central American species, recognized by the combination of moderate size (ca. 2.94 mm), the deep pronotal depressions, and the male genitalia ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9–10 ; described below). This species has a generalized Hydrochus habitus; reliable determinations will require dissection of males. The aedeagus is very narrow, for comparison refer to the diagnosis of H. nayaritensis n. sp.
Male genitalia ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9–10 ). General characters: paramere tips slender and pointed, narrower in lateral view than in dorsal/ventral views, in dorsal/ventral views with medial margins at apex parallel or nearly so, then arcuate away from midline, slightly narrowed proximal to plsa; aedeagus in dorsal/ventral views very slender, parallel-sided or nearly so for entire length, apex pointed; in lateral view wider at base and slightly wider for remainder of length; lateral margins of aedeagus sclerotized; basal piece in dorsal/ventral views tapering from distal to proximal, in lateral view slightly wider proximally than distally, shorter than parameres, orifice strongly sclerotized.
Dorsal surface: pdmm widely separated, overlapping aedeagus only very slightly at base; adbl moderately large; adtl at about distal 1/6; each paramere with prominent pwsa; paramere tips without sclerotized ridge.
Ventral surface: pvmm well separated, except narrowly separated where overlapping aedeagus basally; avtl not apparent.
Remarks. I have examined the holotype, including the male genitalia (LANHM). The specimen imaged ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9–10 ) was collected at this locality: Baja California Sur, 9 mi. up Canyon San Bernardo fr. Boca de la Sierra (Potrero).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hydrochus brianbrowni Makhan
Perkins, Philip D. 2021 |
Hydrochus brianbrowni
Makhan, D. 2005: 63 |