Gyronotus marginatus Péringuey, 1888
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4624.2.10 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B54840C3-4AFE-475E-8B99-7FA8FD799645 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5923863 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/47328C10-F123-B333-FF79-7ED8FAF4837C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Gyronotus marginatus Péringuey, 1888 |
status |
|
Revalidation of Gyronotus marginatus Péringuey, 1888 View in CoL
( Figs. 1E View FIGURE 1 , 3 View FIGURE 3 )
Although Scholtz & Howden (1987: 82) did not see the type of G. marginatus , they stated that “ Gyronotus marginatus Péringuey is without doubt a synonym of G. pumilus . Although the type is missing from the Péringuey collection it is clear from the description and the type locality that the two names refer to one species. Consequently we synonymize G. marginatus with G. pumilus ”.
The type of Gyronotus marginatus has subsequently been located in the Iziko South African Museum (ISAM). It is clearly larger than any specimens of Gyronotus pumilus , as are the paratype specimens (examined by ALVD) that are housed in BMNH.
Consequently, we revalidate Gyronotus marginatus from the junior subjective synonymy with Gyronotus pumilus and re-elevate it to species rank.
Diagnosis. Gyronotus marginatus is clearly much bigger than Gyronotus pumilus . Also, the elytra of G. marginatus are shagreened and fairly even while the elytra of G. pumilus are shagreened and somewhat rugose.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |