Cenomanocarcinus inflatus Van Straelen, 1936
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3215.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B20CD4A6-D150-4CCF-931F-ED6D7EA54E8C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5250362 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4601C935-FFA7-F95B-5BB4-FF23F732FD7A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cenomanocarcinus inflatus Van Straelen, 1936 |
status |
|
Cenomanocarcinus inflatus Van Straelen, 1936 View in CoL
( Fig. 18A, D View FIGURE 18 )
Material examined. Dorsal carapace, upper Cenomanian, Butte de Gazonfier, Le Mans, France ( MNHN J08587 View Materials [see Van Straelen 1936: pl. 4, fig. 8]; MAB k. 2968 represents a cast); dorsal carapace, same provenance ( MNHN R05504, the original of A. Milne-Edwards in Guillier 1886: 244); dorsal carapaces, same provenance ( MHN LM 3804, MHN LM 3806).
Remarks. Specimen MNHN J08587 View Materials ( Fig. 18A, D View FIGURE 18 ) was illustrated by Van Straelen (1936: pl. 4, fig. 8) as ‘topotype’. The name proposed by A. Milne-Edwards in Guillier (1886), was a nomen nudum because a diagnosis was not given. Van Straelen (1936: 37, 38) stated that the type (A. Milne-Edwards’ original) was probably in the MNHN palaeontological collections. This specimen was designated lectotype by Breton & Collins (2007: 18). MNHN J08587 View Materials is, however, a carapace from the Hébert Collection (Collections de la Sorbonne), whereas the original of A. Milne-Edwards bears registration number MNHN R05504. The latter is considered here the holotype, of C. inflatus (see ICZN 1999, Art. 73.1.1), and Van Straelen (1936) as the author of the taxon, because he was the first to present a diagnosis, retaining the name suggested earlier by A. Milne-Edwards in Guillier (1886). The lectotype designation by Breton & Collins (2007) is therefore invalid.
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.