Sympycnodes Turner, 1932
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3454.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:33A08402-9FA1-493C-AF08-E9DD88C5980B |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4416643F-FFDF-607B-FF07-FB7107C8CB3D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Sympycnodes Turner, 1932 |
status |
|
Sympycnodes Turner, 1932 View in CoL
Type species Sympycnodes trigonocosma Turner, 1932 (junior subjective synonym of Zeuzera tripartita T.P. Lucas, 1892 )
Sympycnodes View in CoL was erected by Turner (1932) who based his description mainly on the absence of a median cell (figured in Common 1990) in the two species, Sympycnodes tripartita View in CoL and Sympycnodes rhaptodes View in CoL , that he placed in this genus. Although Schoorl (1990) noticed that the development of the median cell is variable even among closely related species, he retained this genus as valid, as did Edwards (1996).
We have re-examined E. encalypti (the type species of Endoxyla View in CoL ; Figs 88, 89 View FIGURES 88–95 , 114 View FIGURES 114–118 , 119 View FIGURES 119–124 ), S. tripartita View in CoL (the type species of Sympycnodes View in CoL ; Figs 90, 91 View FIGURES 88–95 , 115 View FIGURES 114–118 , 120 View FIGURES 119–124 ), S. rhaptodes View in CoL ( Figs 92–95 View FIGURES 88–95 , 116 View FIGURES 114–118 , 121, 122 View FIGURES 119–124 ), and a series of smaller Zeuzerinae View in CoL species previously considered belonging to Endoxyla View in CoL ( Figs 96–99 View FIGURES 96–105 , 123, 124 View FIGURES 119–124 ), but showing some similarities with S. rhaptodes View in CoL . We found that the venation of the median cell is indeed highly variable and probably not a suitable character to distinguish genera. In most species examined vein M, running through the cell, is weak and atrophied, while it is partially or fully lost in the remainder ( Figs 114–118 View FIGURES 114–118 ). Thus, this character represents a gradient rather than two qualitatively different states. Our examination of the venation, however, revealed that all of the smaller Zeuzerinae View in CoL species examined here, including S. tripartita View in CoL , differ considerably from E. encalypti . While in all of the smaller species R 4 and R 5 of the forewing are long stalked ( Figs 115–118 View FIGURES 114–118 ), the stalk is very short in E. encalypti ( Fig. 114 View FIGURES 114–118 ). Furthermore, R 3 ends at the costa in all of the smaller species, whereas it runs into the apex in E. encalypti . Finally, R 3 and the stalk of R 4 and R 5 are very well developed and strong in the smaller species ( Figs 115–118 View FIGURES 114–118 ), but weak in E. encalypti ( Fig. 114 View FIGURES 114–118 ). Another possible autapomorphy for Sympycnodes View in CoL could be the presence of a crista near the ventral edge of the inner surface of the valva in most species ( Figs 131–140 View FIGURES 131–140 ).
Based on these differences, rather than the characters of the median cell, we transfer two similar species, Endoxyla epicycla Turner, 1945 and Endoxyla arachnophora Turner, 1945 , to Sympycnodes . We further describe six new species, which form a new species group, the Sympycnodes digitata sp. nov. species group.
A modern phylogenetic analysis of the Australian Cossidae is likely to identify additional species that belong to Sympycnodes as well as reveal the need to erect additional genera to accommodate the diverse Australian Zeuzerinae ; however, as such an analysis or a complete revision of the Australian species currently belonging to Endoxyla is beyond the scope of this study, we refrain from transferring other species to Sympycnodes . Similarly, other species, occurring outside of Australia, such as Sceletophyllon kalisi ( Roepke, 1957) , that are similar to S. tripartita may belong to the genus Sympycnodes .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Sympycnodes Turner, 1932
Kallies, Axel 2012 |
Sympycnodes rhaptodes
Turner 1941 |
S. rhaptodes
Turner 1941 |
S. rhaptodes
Turner 1941 |
Sympycnodes
Turner 1932 |
Sympycnodes
Turner 1932 |
Sympycnodes
Turner 1932 |
E. encalypti
Herrich-Schaffer 1854 |
Endoxyla
Herrich-Schaffer 1854 |
Endoxyla
Herrich-Schaffer 1854 |
E. encalypti
Herrich-Schaffer 1854 |
E. encalypti
Herrich-Schaffer 1854 |
E. encalypti
Herrich-Schaffer 1854 |
E. encalypti
Herrich-Schaffer 1854 |
Zeuzerinae
Boisduval 1828 |
Zeuzerinae
Boisduval 1828 |