Spermophila fortipes Lawrence
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/775.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5470346 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/430787C0-A805-FFDA-FC87-FEFCFB030DDA |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Spermophila fortipes Lawrence |
status |
|
Spermophila fortipes Lawrence, 1865b: 171 ( New Granada, line of Panama Railroad).
Now considered part of a population intermediate between Sporophila corvina corvina View in CoL and S. c. hicksii. See Hellmayr, 1938: 191, Olson, 1981b, Stiles, 1996, and Dickinson, 2003: 792.
HOLOTYPE: AMNH 41303 About AMNH , adult male, collected in 1862 by James McLeannan, presumably near the Lion Hill station of the Panama railway, where he was the stationmaster. From the George N. Lawrence Collection.
COMMENTS: Lawrence had the single specimen that he considered fortipes . Hellmayr (1938: 191) considered fortipes a synonym of what he called Sporophila a. aurita . Olson (1981b) studied ‘‘aurita’’ specimens at length, considering them an intergrading population between S. americana corvina and S. a. hicksii. He examined Lawrence’s type of fortipes and it fell at HI 2 on his hybrid index of 0 (5 pure corvina ) to 5 (5 pure hicksii). Stiles (1996) agreed with Olson concerning the hybrid origin of the central Panamanian birds, but elevated corvina to full species status. Dickinson (2003: 792) accepted corvina as an allospecies of Sporophila and recognized both S. c. corvina and S. c. hicksii.
Siegel and Olson (2008) discussed this type locality and place it at ca. 09.13N, 79.54W.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Spermophila fortipes Lawrence
LeCroy, Mary 2012 |
Spermophila fortipes
Lawrence, G. N. 1865: 171 |