Phoca Linnaeus, 1758
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7359191 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7288717 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/41263629-C31D-7448-FF1A-FA8EFD741C05 |
treatment provided by |
GgServerImporter |
scientific name |
Phoca Linnaeus, 1758 |
status |
|
Phoca Linnaeus, 1758 View in CoL . Syst. Nat., 10th ed., 1:37 View Cited Treatment .
TYPE SPECIES: Phoca vitulina Linnaeus, 1758 View in CoL , by tautonomy.
COMMENTS: Burns and Fay (1970), Rice (1977), McDermid and Bonner (1975), Gromov and Baranova (1981), J. E. King (1983), and Wyss (1988) considered Phoca, Pusa , Histriophoca , and Pagophilus a monophyletic group. However, Muizon (1982a) suggested that Histricophoca and Pagophilus may be more closely related to Cystophora than to Phoca (sensu stricto). Burns and Fay (1970) and McDermid and Bonner (1975) argued that these differences should be recognized only at the subgeneric level which is followed here.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.