Spilogale putorius (Linnaeus, 1758)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7359191 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7288490 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/41263629-C30F-745A-FF0F-F9EBFAA61C31 |
treatment provided by |
GgServerImporter |
scientific name |
Spilogale putorius (Linnaeus, 1758) |
status |
|
Spilogale putorius (Linnaeus, 1758) View in CoL . Syst. Nat., 10th ed., 1:44.
TYPE LOCALITY: "America septentrionali" restricted by Thomas (1911a), to " South Carolina." [ USA].
DISTRIBUTION: SW Canada east to Minnesota and S Pennsylvania ( USA); south to Costa Rica.
SYNONYMS: ambigua Mearns, 1897 ; angustifrons Howell, 1902 ; bicolor Gray, 1837 ; gracilis Merriam, 1890 ; interrupta Rafinesque, 1820 ; larvatus Hodgson, 1849 ; leucoparia Merriam, 1890; lucasona Merriam, 1890; microdon Howell, 1906 ; mupurita Müller, 1776; olimpica Elliot, 1899; phenax Merriam, 1890; putida Cuvier, 1798 ; quaterlinearis Winans, 1859; ringens Merriams, 1890; saxatalis Merriam, 1890; striata Shaw, 1800 ; tenuis Howell, 1902; texensis Merriam, 1890 ; tibetanus Horsfield, 1851; zorilla Schreber, 1776.
COMMENTS: Mead (1968) argued that S. p. gracilis and "possibly" leucoparia are reproductively isolated from eastern populations and therefore should be considered distinct species; both were included by Van Gelder (1959).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.