Ictonyx Kaup, 1835
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7359191 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7288508 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/41263629-C30E-7454-FF08-F648FE321738 |
treatment provided by |
GgServerImporter |
scientific name |
Ictonyx Kaup, 1835 |
status |
|
Ictonyx Kaup, 1835 View in CoL . Das Thierreich in Seinen Hauptformen, 1:352.
TYPE SPECIES: Ictonyx capensis Kaup, 1835 View in CoL (= Bradypus striatus Perry, 1810 View in CoL ) ( Melville and Smith, 1987).
SYNONYMS: Ictidonyx Agassiz, 1846 ; Ictomys Roberts, 1936 ; Poecilictis Thomas and Hinton, 1920 ; Rhabdogale Wiegmann, 1838 ; Zorilla I. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1826.
COMMENTS: There is considerable controversy over the correct name for this genus (Herschkovitz, 1955b; Van Gelder, 1966). Zorilla Oken, 1816, is invalid ( International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1956b). Zorilla Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1826, was suppressed under the plenary powers for the purposes of the Principle of Priority ( International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1967). Rosevear (1974) strongly suggested, and Dekeyser (1955) and Niethammer (1987a) argued that Poecilictis Thomas and Hinton, 1920 , and Ictonyx are congeneric. The principal skull features used to erect the new genus by Thomas and Hinton (1920) could not be supported when a more extensive series of specimens was measured ( Rosevear, 1974).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.