Melinae Bonaparte, 1838
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7359191 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7288431 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/41263629-C30B-745E-FF7B-FAF8F9731C44 |
treatment provided by |
GgServerImporter |
scientific name |
Melinae Bonaparte, 1838 |
status |
|
Subfamily Melinae Bonaparte, 1838 View in CoL . Nuovi Ann Sci. Nat., 2:111.
COMMENTS: Reviewed by Long (1978) and Long and Killingley (1983). Revised by Pocock (1921 b, d, 1941a), Petter (1971), and Wozencraft (1989a), who suggested that this may not be a monophyletic group. Pocock recognized as subfamilies, and Petter as tribes, four groups: (1) Meles , Arctonyx ; (2) Melogale ; (3) Mydaus ; and (4) Taxidea . Pocock (1920b), Long (1981), and Wozencraft (1989b) argued for the separation of Taxidea into a monotypic subfamily, Taxidiinae , which would be consistent with the phylogenetic hypotheses refered to above and which will be followed here. Petter (1971), Radinsky (1973), and Schmidt-Kittler (1981) suggested that Mydaus may be the sister group to Mephitinae . Its placement in this subfamily is provisional.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Melinae Bonaparte, 1838
W. Christopher Wozencraft 1993 |
Melinae
Bonaparte 1838: 111 |