Diaporthe ulmina Y.K. Bai & X.L. Fan, 2023
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.98.104156 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/40CC76A2-5729-5B54-99C3-E088EB19CC3E |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Diaporthe ulmina Y.K. Bai & X.L. Fan |
status |
sp. nov. |
Diaporthe ulmina Y.K. Bai & X.L. Fan sp. nov.
Fig. 4 View Figure 4
Etymology.
Named after the host genus on which it was collected, Ulmus .
Description.
Sexual morph: Ascostromata immersed in bark, erumpent, with 3-4 perithecial in black entostromata, conceptacle absent, 300-600 μm diam. Perithecia black, scattered, arranged circularly, ovoid to spherical, 250-380 μm (av. = 310 ± 30 μm, n = 30) diam. Asci 8-spored, unitunicate, clavate to cylindrical, sessile, 37-43 × 4.5-7 μm (av. = 40 ± 1.5 × 5.6 ± 0.5 μm, n = 50). Ascospores fusoid, hyaline, 2-4 guttulate, smooth-walled, 9-11 × 2-3.5 μm (av. = 9.9 ± 0.4 × 2.8 ± 0.4 μm, n = 50), L/W = 3-4 (av. = 3.4 ± 0.2, n = 50). Asexual morph not observed.
Culture characteristics.
Cultures with felty aerial mycelium are initially white, growing slowly and entirely covering the 9 cm Petri dish after 8 days, felty with a uniform texture and regular edge. Conidiomata were not observed until 30 days.
Specimens examined.
China, Beijing, Mentougou District, Mountain Dongling, Xiaolongmen Forestry Centre , 39°58'19.65"N, 113°12'39.24"E, from branches of Ulmus pumila , 16 Jun 2022, Y.K. Bai & X.L. Fan (holotype BJFC CF202212142, ex-type living culture: CFCC 58828; other living culture: CFCC 58829; ibid. BJFC CF2022121423, culture CFCC 58830) GoogleMaps .
Notes.
Diaporthe ulmina is associated with canker disease of Ulmus pumila . In this study, the isolates CFCC 58828 and 58829 formed a single-lineage clade with high support values (ML/BI = 100/1.00) and it appears to be most closely related to D. huairouensis (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ). Diaporthe ulmina differs from D. huairouensis isolated from Corylus heterophylla by host association ( Bai et al. 2022). Phylogenetically, D. ulmina can be distinguished from D. huairouensis by base differences as follows: 16/466 for ITS, 4/420 for cal, 17/473 for his3, 34/329 for tef1-α and 10/420 for tub2 ( Bai et al. 2022). Therefore, D. ulmina is described as a new species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |