Phrurotimpus daliensis, Mu & Lin & Zhang, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5124.5.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:60A5A937-ACF9-4807-B1FE-50ACE0266676 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6425754 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3F6187D6-FF94-FF8A-4CD4-18D65DEAB40B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Phrurotimpus daliensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Phrurotimpus daliensis View in CoL sp. n. (kff提ůfl)
Figs 1–4 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 , 10 View FIGURE 10
Type material. Holotype ♂: CHINA: Yunnan Province: Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, Fengyi Town (25°35′26.61″N, 100°18′8.57″E), 2026 m elev., 15.VII.2021, leg. Yannan Mu. GoogleMaps
Paratypes: 10♂ 33♀, same data as holotype GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The specific name is derived from the type locality; adjective.
Diagnosis. This new species can be distinguished from P. baoshanensis sp. n. by 1) RTA wider than in the latter species, and the distance between the RTA and cymbium smaller than P. baoshanensis sp. n.; 2) bursa triangular and positioned above the spermathecae, and separated by about half the diameter of spermathecae (vs close in P. baoshanensis sp. n.); 3) spermathecae large and round as opposed to small and oval in P. baoshanensis sp. n..
Description. Male (Holotype): total length 1.74, carapace 0.85 long, 0.69 wide; abdomen 0.89 long, 0.55 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances:AME 0.06, ALE 0.06, PME 0.05, PLE 0.05; AME–AME 0.03, AME–ALE 0.01, ALE– ALE 0.14, PME–PME 0.04, PME–PLE 0.03, PLE–PLE 0.20, ALE–PLE 0.04. EAW 0.27, CRW 0.37, EAW/CRW 0.73, CRW/CW 0.54. MOA 0.15 long, anterior width 0.14, posterior width 0.14. CH 0.07, CH /AME 1.17. Labium 0.08 long, 0.14 wide. Sternum 0.57 long, 0.44 wide. Carapace oval, dark in color, with several slight lighter bands either side of fovea ( Figs 1A View FIGURE 1 , 2A View FIGURE 2 ); middle of carapace with sparse iridescent scales, margin of carapace with ring of iridescent scales ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ). Sternum gray, without pattern. Abdomen darker than carapace, large dorsal scutum covering most of dorsum, with iridescent scales on side and behind dorsal scutum ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ). All femora and patella black, tibiae I–IV black with white tip except tibia III yellow, all metatarsi and tarsi yellowish without markings ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ).
Palp as in Figs 4A–D View FIGURE 4 . Femur without apophysis, swollen ventrally at middle parts, without setae. Patella and tibia short, cymbium longer than femur. Tibia with single large retrolateral apophysis and small dorsal apophysis. Tegulum narrower than cymbium, sperm duct two times longer than tegulum and half as wide as tegulum, curved as S-shaped in prolateral view. Embolus short, directed retrodistally. Conductor membranous, triangular.
Female: One paratype: total length 2.34, carapace 1.05 long, 0.83 wide; abdomen 1.29 long, 0.83 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.06, ALE 0.08, PME 0.06, PLE 0.06; AME – AME 0.04, AME – ALE 0.01, ALE – ALE 0.17, PME – PME 0.05, PME – PLE 0.03, PLE – PLE 0.23, ALE – PLE 0.05. EAW 0.33, CRW 0.46, EAW / CRW 0.72, CRW / CW 0.55. MOA 0.18 long, anterior width 0.16, posterior width 0.17. CH 0.09, CH / AME 1.50 . Labium 0.10 long, 0.17 wide. Sternum 0.69 long, 0.41 wide. Other characters as for male, except larger body size, broad band with dense iridescent scales posterior to eye area, and without dorsal scutum on abdomen ( Fig. 2E–F View FIGURE 2 ) .
Epigyne as in Fig. 4E–H View FIGURE 4 . Copulatory openings large, situated medially, separated by about 2.5 times spermathecae diameter. Copulatory ducts short, thick. Bursa triangular, semi-transparent. Connecting tube between bursae and spermathecae thinner than copulatory ducts. Spermathecae round, separated by more than half their width. Fertilization ducts located on dorsal side of spermathecae.
Measurement of legs:
Distribution. China (Yunnan Province)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |