Halecium brevithecum Watson, 2008

Peña Cantero, Álvaro L., 2014, Revision of the Antarctic species of Halecium Oken, 1815 (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa, Haleciidae), Zootaxa 3790 (2), pp. 243-280 : 251-253

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3790.2.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BE6B199C-6E81-478A-8AC9-EB674B85FA35

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4630875

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3E6287E0-2945-FF85-2CA9-1EAE3D0EFA20

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Halecium brevithecum Watson, 2008
status

 

Halecium brevithecum Watson, 2008 View in CoL

( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A–C)

Halecium brevithecum Watson, 2008: 168 View in CoL View Cited Treatment –169, fig. 4A–C.

Material examined. Holotype, BANZARE Stn 41, 65°48'S 53°16'E (Enderby Land), 209 m, NMV F147457, one microslide with a few stem fragments (longest c. 15 mm long).

Diagnosis. Large, reddish, polysiphonic, irregularly branched stems. Branches originating either from abcauline side of hydrophore of primary hydrotheca or from inside hydrotheca. Usually, with ahydrothecate intermediate internode after apophysis. First hydrothecate branch internode distinctly longer. Hydrothecae alternately arranged in one plane. Hydrotheca at the end of short, adnate hydrophore. Hydrotheca very slightly widening distally; rim not everted. Adcauline hydrothecal wall adnate to internode. Hydrothecal aperture slightly directed downwards. No secondary hydrothecae present. Gonothecae unknown. Cnidome consisting at least of microbasic euryteles?

Description. Thick, reddish stems. “Stem or branch fragments of a presumably larger colony. Stem (branch) fascicled, polysiphonic tubes varying from knotted to parallel. Branching irregular, ultimate branches monosiphonic” ( Watson 2008: 169). Stem and branches divided into relatively short and thick internodes by alternately arranged, slightly oblique nodes ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 B, C). Branches originating either just below hydrotheca on abcauline side (secondary branch more or less perpendicular to old one) or, more frequently, from inside hydrotheca. Usually, with ahydrothecate intermediate internode following apophysis ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A). First hydrothecate internode of branch distinctly longer ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A).

Hydrothecae alternately arranged in approximately one plane. Hydrothecae low ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A–C), placed at end of adnate hydrophores; ratio between adcauline length of hydrophore and diameter at diaphragm 0.7–1.0. Hydrotheca very slightly widening distally. Adcauline wall much higher than abcauline one, extending upwards on internode ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A–C). Adcauline hydrothecal wall adnate to internode. Hydrothecal aperture slightly directed downwards ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A–C). No secondary hydrothecae present.

Measurements (in µm). Hydrothecae: diameter at aperture 215–225, diameter at diaphragm 200–215, height 20–25. Hydrophore: adcauline length 130–200. Internode: length 640–1240, diameter 230–350. Cnidome: microbasic euryteles? (only one type could be observed), c. 12.5 x 5.

Remarks. The overall colony form is not yet known. According to Watson (2008: 169) branches “given off from side of a hydrophore; branches beginning with three to five deeply indented transverse nodes, internodes thereafter moderately long”. As stated above, in the holotype, branches more frequently arise from within the hydrothecae.

Watson (2008) stated that the adnate hydrophore becomes free just below the hydrotheca. However, in the material examined, the hydrophore is completely adnate. In fact, as stated above, the adcauline hydrothecal wall is also adnate to the internode [as it was also pointed out by Watson (2008)], and, consequently, there is no way for the hydrophore to be partially free.

Halecium brevithecum was described from very scarce, infertile material, most mounted into microslides. Because of this, H. brevithecum cannot be completely characterized. The gonothecae are unknown and the cnidome information is practically non-existent (I could observe only one nematocyst). Halecium brevithecum is similar to H. jaederholmi and H. secundum (see below for a discussion about the differences with those species).

Ecology and distribution. Halecium brevithecum is known from depths between 209 and 502 m, off Enderby Land and Knox Coast ( Watson 2008).

NMV

Museum Victoria

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Cnidaria

Class

Hydrozoa

Order

Leptothecata

Family

Haleciidae

Genus

Halecium

Loc

Halecium brevithecum Watson, 2008

Peña Cantero, Álvaro L. 2014
2014
Loc

Halecium brevithecum

Watson 2008: 168
2008
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF