Scrapter spinipes, Kuhlmann, 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2014.95 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BE14FE18-E9AB-4C5A-B260-BD9C54464A2A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3861129 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/33BE1BCA-688F-4E9B-AD5D-5E5AC395B6BF |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:33BE1BCA-688F-4E9B-AD5D-5E5AC395B6BF |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Scrapter spinipes |
status |
sp. nov. |
Scrapter spinipes sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:33BE1BCA-688F-4E9B-AD5D-5E5AC395B6BF
Diagnosis
The female of S. spinipes sp. nov. can be separated from other species of this group by the combination of the following characters: supraclypeal area and clypeus densely and distinctly punctate, shiny, only partly superficially sculptured ( Fig. 30B View Fig ), scutum densely and coarsely punctate, basal area of propodeum medially about 1.5 times as long as metanotum ( Fig. 30 View Fig C–D), stigma brown, apical margins of metasomal terga black, terga densely and coarsely punctate ( Fig. 30E View Fig ). The male is characterized by an unmodified antenna, coarsely and densely punctate scutum and metasomal terga ( Fig. 31C View Fig ), hind tibia apically broadened inside, forming a long spine ( Fig. 31E View Fig ), and the form of S7 ( Fig. 31D View Fig ).
Etymology
Named for the conspicuous apicolateral spine of the male hind tibia.
Type material (63 specimens examined)
Holotype
SOUTH AFRICA: ♂, 12 km NW of Nieuwoudtville, Farm Avontuur , Fynbos, 770 m, 31°16'18" S, 19°02'55" E, 18 Aug. 2012, M. Kuhlmann ( SANC).
GoogleMapsParatypes
SOUTH AFRICA: 1 ♀, 4 ♂♂, same data as holotype (SANC 2 ♂♂, RCMK 1 ♀, 2 ♂♂); 8 ♂♂, idem, 3 Sep. 2012, MK (RCMK); 1 ♀, 1 ♂, Ouberg Pass, 27 km SE of Vanrhynsdorp, Fynbos, 380 m, 31°48'07" S, 18°55'00" E, 9 Aug. 2011, MK (RCMK); 13 ♂♂, idem, 8 Aug. 2012, MK (NHML 9 ♂♂, RCMK 4 ♂♂); 1 ♀, 1 ♂, idem, 13 Aug. 2012, MK (RCMK); 2 ♀♀, 7 ♂♂, idem, 23 Aug. 2012, MK (NHML 5 ♂♂, RCMK 2 ♀♀, 2 ♂♂), 6 ♀♀, 17 ♂♂, idem, 30 Aug. 2012, MK (SANC 2 ♀♀, 2 ♂♂, NHML 2 ♀♀, 11 ♂♂, RCMK 2 ♀♀, 4 ♂♂).
Description
Female
BODY LENGTH. 4.8–5.1 mm.
HEAD. Head wider than long. Integument black, except part of mandibles dark reddish-brown. Face sparsely covered with long, greyish, erect hair ( Fig. 30B View Fig ). Clypeus slightly convex with coarse punctation, apically sparse (i = 2–3 d), basally dense (i = 0.5–1 d); surface between punctures apically smooth and shiny, basally superficially shagreened and slightly matt ( Fig. 30B View Fig ). Malar area medially narrow, almost linear. Antenna dorsally blackish-brown, ventrally yellowish-brown.
MESOSOMA. Integument black. Mesoscutal disc between punctures superficially reticulate but shiny; disc densely (i = 0.5–1.0 d) and coarsely punctate ( Fig. 30 View Fig C–D). Metanotum distinctly shorter than basal area of propodeum, apically with broad carinate depression ( Fig. 30D View Fig ). Propodeum basally distinctly and broadly carinate ( Fig. 30D View Fig ). Mesoscutum, scutellum, metanotum, mesepisternum and propodeum sparsely covered with short, greyish, erect hair ( Fig. 30A View Fig ).
WINGS. Slightly yellowish-brown; wing venation and stigma brown.
LEGS. Integument black to dark reddish-brown; fore tibia basally partly with small yellowish spot. Vestiture greyish-white, scopa greyish-white, dorsally slightly brownish.
METASOMA. Integument black, apical margins of terga partly narrowly translucent reddish-brown ( Fig. 30E View Fig ). Discs of T1 and T2 without hair; following terga with very few and short but increasingly more and longer hair; apical tergal hair bands missing on all terga ( Fig. 30E View Fig ). Prepygidial and pygidial fimbriae dark greyish-brown. T1 densely (i = 1 d) and relatively coarsely but irregularly punctate, between punctures superficially sculptured and shiny; T2–T4 superficially sculptured but shiny, with dense, relatively coarse punctation; T2–T4 with superficially sculptured but shiny, broad apical tergal depression ( Fig. 30D View Fig ).
Male
BODY LENGTH. 4.8–5.1 mm.
HEAD. Head slightly wider than long. Integument black, except mandible partly dark reddish-brown. Face densely covered with long, greyish-white, erect hair. Malar area medially narrow, almost linear. Antenna dorsally dark brown, ventrally yellowish-brown, sometimes apical flagellar segments completely or largely dark brown ( Fig. 31A View Fig ).
MESOSOMA. Integument black. Mesoscutal disc between punctures superficially reticulate and slightly matt; disc densely (i = 0.5–1.0 d) and very coarsely punctate. Mesoscutum, scutellum, metanotum, mesepisternum and propodeum covered with long, greyish, erect hair ( Fig. 31A View Fig ).
WINGS. Slightly yellowish-brown; wing venation and stigma brown.
LEGS. Integument black, fore tibia in the basal half anteriorly yellow ( Fig. 31A View Fig ). Hind tibia inside apically broadened, with a long spine; hind basitarsus subapically broadened ( Fig. 31E View Fig ). Vestiture greyish-white.
METASOMA. Integument black, apical margins of terga partly narrowly translucent reddish-brown ( Fig. 31C View Fig ). Discs of T1–T2 without hair; following terga with very few and short but increasingly more and longer hair; apical tergal hair bands missing on all terga ( Fig. 31C View Fig ). T1 and following terga densely (i ˂ 0.5 d) and very coarsely punctate, between punctures polished and shiny; terga with narrow, superficially sculptured but shiny apical tergal depression ( Fig. 31C View Fig ). S3 and particularly S4–S5 with long, sparse apical hair fringes.
TERMINALIA. Genitalia ( Fig. 31B View Fig ), S7 ( Fig. 31D View Fig ) and terminal plate of S8 ( Fig. 31F View Fig ) as illustrated.
Distribution
The species has only been found on sandy soils in Fynbos of the wider Nieuwoudtville area.
Floral hosts
Brassicaceae : Heliophila sp., with a strong preference for blue-flowering species.
Seasonal activity
August–September.
SANC |
Agricultural Research Council-Plant Protection Research Institute |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |