Forcipomyia (F.) pyrenaica, Szadziewski & Dominiak & Withers, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3161/00034541ANZ2020.70.1.006 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3795972 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3D528C47-FF99-BF28-34C9-E241FB68FE0D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Forcipomyia (F.) pyrenaica |
status |
sp. nov. |
Forcipomyia View in CoL View at ENA (F.) pyrenaica sp. nov.
( Figs 1–3 View Figure 1 View Figure 2 View Figure 3 )
Diagnosis. The new species can be easily distinguished by having very low tarsal ratio of hind leg TR(3) 0.45, palpomere 3 enlarged on proximal 1 / 3, parameres separated, stout on proximal 2 / 3 and filamentous on distal 1 / 3, aedeagus with triangular median projection and distinct lateral shoulders. Female unknown.
Description. Male. Body dark brown with pale parts of legs and abdomen ( Fig. 2a View Figure 2 ). Head dark brown. Eyes bare, touching at distance of 6 ommatidia. Frons with distinct tubercle bearing stout, black spine-like seta (with a barb) in submedian position ( Fig. 1c View Figure 1 ). Flagellum with 13 flagellomeres ( Fig. 1a View Figure 1 ), length 1.10 mm, AR 1.11, distal flagellomeres 10–13 elongated, plume on flagellomeres 2–10 well developed, flagellomere 10 about 2.45 times longer than flagellomere 11. Palpus 5-segmented ( Fig. 1b View Figure 1 ); palpomere 3 with distinct sensory pit on enlarged basal 1 / 3, length 0.14 mm, PR 4.0; palpomere 4 about 1.4 times longer than palpomere 5.
Thorax including scutellum dark brown ( Fig. 2a View Figure 2 ). Wing with two darker patches at anterior margin, on first radial cells and on radial fork ( Fig. 2b View Figure 2 ); length 1.55 mm, CR 0.45; first radial cell slit-like, second one small; wing membrane with scale-like slender macrotrichia. Legs pale brownish, femur of hind leg brown ( Fig. 2a View Figure 2 ), tarsomeres 4 distinctly longer than tarsomere 5, claws long, empodium well developed, TR (1) 0.63, TR(2) 0.36, TR(3) 0.45.
Abdomen dark brown with pale caudal margins of tergites ( Fig. 2a View Figure 2 ). Genitalia dark brown with pale gonostyli ( Fig. 3a View Figure 3 ). Caudal margin of sternite 9 slightly convex with broad and shallow median incision. Gonocoxite without modified setae, gonostylus almost straight. Aedeagus shield-shaped, well sclerotized with well developed long triangular median projection and distinct lateral shoulders ( Fig. 3b View Figure 3 ). Parameres separat- ed, stout, rod-like on proximal 2 / 3 and narrow, filamentous on distal 1 / 3 ( Fig. 3c View Figure 3 ).
Female unknown.
Material examined. Forcipomyia (F.) pyrenaica sp. nov., holotype male, France, Pyrenees-Orientales, RNN foret de la Massane, Malaise trap, about 600 m a.s.l., 9.09.2008, P. Withers. The holotype is deposited in the Museum of Amber Inclusions , University of Gdańsk , in the Collection of Extant Invertebrates .
Etymology. The specific name refers to the Pyrenees mountains (Latin Pyrenaei) where the species was collected.
Discussion. The new species is a typical member of the subgenus Forcipomyia s. str. ( Alwin and Szadziewski 2013). The subgenus including almost 350 extant species is distributed worldwide ( Borkent 2016). The low hind tarsal ratio (less than 0.5) is known among a few species of Forcipomyia s. str. outside of Europe. European species of the subgenus have higher hind TR, usually about 0.8–1.2 ( Goetghebuer 1934, Remm 1962, 1980, Szadziewski 1983, Navai and Szadziewski 2016).
In the holotype the tubercle of the frons in sub- median position has stout black spine-like seta with a distinct barb ( Fig. 1c View Figure 1 ). In all, known for us, adults of biting midges this tubercle is devoid of setae and we treat this character as a developmental aberration. Similar setae (forked, with serrations, barbs or spurs) are known in immature stages (larvae and pupae) of Forcipomyia ( Lewańczyk et al. 2009) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |