Coprophanaeus, Olsoufieff, 1924
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5352924 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3A7F7B2C-7F4B-8844-FF34-FC9222EEE9F2 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Coprophanaeus |
status |
|
Coprophanaeus View in CoL (C.) gamezi Arnaud, 2002
Fig. 99 View Figure 95-101 , 106, 111 View Figure 102-112 , 113 View Figure 113 , 140-144 View Figure 140-144
Coprophanaeus gamezi Arnaud, 2002a: 8 View in CoL
Type. Holotype male, private collection of Patrick Arnaud , Saintry sur Seine, France (examined by photo).
Diagnosis. General – Metallic coloration dark green, blue or yellowish green, confined to posterior areas of head and pronotal sides and margins; elytra black or tinged with highlights of same tone as pronotum. Clypeal margin clearly explanate/angulate lateral to median teeth ( Fig. 140, 143 View Figure 140-144 ). Posteromedian portion of pronotum granulate, granules often coalescing as transverse, squamose ridging. Sulcus paralleling carinate posterior margin of pronotum ( Fig. 111 View Figure 102-112 ) distinctly sculptured (x25); carina usually broken up by dense puncturing, often crenulate. Posterior pronotal fossae and surrounding area densely, finely granulate. Length 18-28 mm.
Male ( Fig. 142-144 View Figure 140-144 ) – Tip of head horn almost reaching level of prothoracic carina; anterior surface of base usually punctate; length of central process equal to that of base. Pronotal prominence with strongly developed rounded, tab-like projection, itself often weakly bitumose; median process flanked on each side by small, acute tubercle. Length of parameres about one-half that of phallobase.
Female ( Fig. 99 View Figure 95-101 , 106 View Figure 102-112 , 140-141 View Figure 140-144 ) – Cephalic carina bowed anteriorly, trituberculate, median tooth raised, much larger than lateral tubercles ( Fig. 99 View Figure 95-101 ). Vertex coarsely, densely punctured. Pronotal ridge quadrate, summit scarcely trituberculate, if at all ( Fig. 106 View Figure 102-112 ). Anteromedian concavity shallow, posterior (upper) margin simple, not bitumose.
Specimens examined – 201.
Distribution. Mesoamerica – Maracaibo, Venezuelan Coast and Venezuelan Llanos provinces and adjacent Amazonia ( Fig. 113 View Figure 113 ).
Collection Records. BRAZIL: Roraima – Serra da Moça (Jul) . COLOMBIA: Bolívar – Mompox, 9 o 14’N 74 o 25’W (Jun) GoogleMaps ; Zambrano, Hacienda Monterrey , 9 o 37’48"N 74 o 54’44"W, 135 m (Feb). Boyacá – El Mortiño (Aug). Cundinamarca – Tocaima (Mar). Magdalena – Onaca, 770 m (Dec) GoogleMaps ; Bonda (Jun) . GUYANA: Rupununi – Parara Ranch , 3 o 37.3’N 59 o 44.2’W (Apr). Vichada – Municipio Cumaribo, PNN El Tuparro, 5 o 21’03"N 67 o 52’15"W, 135 m (Feb) GoogleMaps ; Puerto Correrio (Nov) . VENEZUELA: Amazonas – Puerto Ayacucho (May) ; 32 km S Puerto Ayacucho [ Cataniapo River ] (May). Aragua – Maracay, 450 m
(Nov). Barinas – Maravillas (Sep) ; Saboneta [Mpio. Alberto Torrealba], 200 m ( Jun ). Bolívar – 48 km ESE Cd. Bolívar [Rancho Santa Rita], 7 o 55’N 63 o 10’W (Jul) GoogleMaps ; Suapuré River (Jul) ; Sipao , 110 km E Caicara del Orinoco (Jun, Aug) ; 70 km W. Caicara del Orinoco ; 70 km W Cd. Bolívar, Puente Cocuizas (Jun-Aug) ; 35 km SW Puerto Ordaz (Jul-Aug) ; Guri (Jul) ; Caura River, Jabillal , Orinoco, 200 m (Aug) ; El Dorado [Minas de Payapal] (May). Carabobo – San Esteban [near Puerto Cabello] (Dec) ; Saman Mocho, Flor Amarillo ( Feb , Jul ). Delta Amacuro – 11 km W Piacoa ( Jul ). Guárico – Tucupido ( Jul ) Mérida – Mpio. Padre Noguera , Sector Cuenca del Río Capara , 7 o 50’32”N 71 o 30’34”W, 280 m (Apr). Sucre – Cumanacoa (Dec). Zulia – Santa Ana [Mpio. Colón Hacienda], 8 o 54’30”N 71 o 52’17”W, 175 m (Aug) GoogleMaps ; El Caracolí [ Mpio. Colón], 70 m (May) ; Mpio. Colón, Sector Bancada de Limones , Finca El Recreo (Apr) .
Comments. This species most closely resembles C. cyanescens (q.v.) from which it differs, among other characters, by the coarse sculpturing of the posterior margin of the pronotum ( Fig. 111 View Figure 102-112 ) and female pronotal ridge ( Fig. 99 View Figure 95-101 ). Gámez (2004) and Gámez and Acconcia (2009) studied this species in the Maracaibo district of Mérida, where it prefers open habitats and readily invades induced pasture lands, and presented detailed information on its activity.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Coprophanaeus
Edmonds, W. D. & Zidek, J. 2010 |
Coprophanaeus gamezi
Arnaud, P. 2002: 8 |