Eresus da Lin & Li, 2022
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e94853 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BE54E35B-FDB5-4550-8FEF-A3FC5702EEC4 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3A3D7EFE-07DE-52FB-A0E5-92ED4823B433 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Eresus da Lin & Li |
status |
sp. n. |
Eresus da Lin & Li sp. n.
Materials
Type status: Holotype. Occurrence: recordedBy: Xin Zhao; individualID: IZCAS-Ar43547; sex: female; occurrenceID: 9B247645-5769-574E-9924-00D870022C35; Taxon: taxonID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:A52C7C88-A951-4E80-8B28-751DDF692327 ; scientificName: Eresus da Lin & Li, sp. n.; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Arachnida; order: Araneae; family: Eresidae; genus: Eresus; Location: country: China; stateProvince: Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region ; county: Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture; municipality: Fukang City; locality: Wutonggou National Desert Park ; verbatimElevation: 388 m; decimalLatitude: 44.3920; decimalLongitude: 87.8707; Identification: identifiedBy: Yejie Lin; Event: year: 2022; month: 7; day: 25 GoogleMaps GoogleMaps
Description
Female (Holotype, IZCAS-Ar43547): Habitus as in Fig. 2 View Figure 2 A and B. Carapace 10.88 long, 8.62 wide, 8.92 high. Carapace nearly equally wide at pars cephalica and pars thoracica. Carapace red-brown with white setae; pars cephalica elevated. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.21, ALE 0.26, PME 0.51, PLE 0.33, AME-AME 0.37, AME-ALE 3.56, PME-PME 0.65, PME-PLE 2.52, AME-PME 0.11. Pars cephalica with a pointed posterior margin dorsally, almost as long as wide. Chelicerae covered with narrowed white and black setae. Legs with a white ring of setae at joints. Legs with ventral macrosetae on Ta, Mt and Ti I-IV. Leg measurements: I: 17.83 (5.17+5.90+3.94+2.82); II: 16.46 (5.54+5.89+2.94+2.09); III: 14.77 (4.80+5.68+2.63+1.66); IV: 19.53 (6.33+7.29+3.74+2.17). Abdomen dark brown, covered with black setae, with white spots, sigilla conspicuous, surrounded by white setae.
Epigyne (Fig. 3 View Figure 3 ) with sclerotised margins, longer than high. Middle plant beyond posterior edge of epigyne margin. Fissure bow-shaped. Copulatory duct translucent, with spermathecal epithelium on anterior edge. Spermathecae distinctly lobed, reaching further laterally than copulatory ducts.
Male. Unknown.
Diagnosis
Females of Eresus da sp. n. are similar to those of E. kollari by a relatively gentle slope of the ocular area (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 C and D; Řezáč et al. 2008, fig. 4D; Miller et al. 2012, fig. 2F) and with the epigynal area longer than high (Fig. 3 View Figure 3 A; Řezáč et al. 2008, figs. 2A-J). This species can be distinguished from E. kollari by the abdomen with a large number of white spots (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 D) (vs. abdomen uniformly black in E. kollari ), the anterior edge of copulatory duct within the anterior edge of epigyne (vs. beyond the anterior edge of epigyne in E. kollari ) and the ventral of fissure curved (vs. almost straight in E. kollari ) (Fig. 4 View Figure 4 ).
Etymology
The species name is a noun in apposition derived from the Chinese pinyin “dà” (giant) and refers to the large size of this new species.
Distribution
Known only from the type locality (Xinjiang, China).
Ecology
The spider was found behind a clump of desert plants (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 A). The spider habitat is under the ground, with a silk tunnel (around 20 cm in length) connecting its opening and underground nest (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 A and B). This underground living strategy may be an adaptive strategy for escaping from the sunlight heating and extremely high temperature of the ground surface. As the silken tunnel was wrapped with dozens of empty beetle exoskeletons (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 C and D), we assume that the desert-living beetles are the main diet of the spider, which has a thick fang to pierce the beetles while feeding. In addition, the small size of the spider’s eyes suggest that the spider may adopt a sit-and-wait hunting strategy and that it does not rely on visual signals for hunting.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.