Ectinopus holomelas (Burmeister)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4329.5.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:180Ca01D-3268-419D-9E07-500B15438Fce |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3A0ADD31-DA2D-FFF6-FF55-FDD9DECFFC2B |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Ectinopus holomelas (Burmeister) |
| status |
|
Ectinopus holomelas (Burmeister)
( Figs. 9A View FIGURE 9 , 10 View FIGURE 10 )
Cydnus holomelas Burmeister, 1835: 375 .
Ectinopus holomelas: Dallas, 1851: 122 ; Stål, 1862: 96; 1876: 20; Walker, 1867: 164; Distant, 1880: 8; Signoret, 1881: 320; Uhler, 1886: 3; Lethierry & Severin, 1893: 64; Froeschner, 1960: 412.
Aethus fusiformis Walker, 1867: 150 , syn. by Distant, 1880.
Pangaeus ? fusiformis: Uhler, 1877: 389 .
Ectinopus opacus Distant, 1900: 688 , syn. by Froeschner, 1960.
Material examined: 1 specimen, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Corcovado , MNRJ.
Distribution: Mexico, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Panama, Colombia, Brazil (PA, RJ, new rec.), Bolivia. Remarks: The lack of abundant, coarse punctures on the impressed line and on the lateral surface of the pronotum, head and scutellum ( Fig. 9A View FIGURE 9 ) separates this species from E. rugoscutum ( Fig. 9B View FIGURE 9 ).
| MNRJ |
Museu Nacional/Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Ectinopus holomelas (Burmeister)
| Schwertner, Cristiano Feldens 2017 |
Ectinopus opacus
| Distant 1900: 688 |
fusiformis :
| Uhler 1877: 389 |
Aethus fusiformis
| Walker 1867: 150 |
Pangaeus
| Stål 1862 |
Ectinopus holomelas
| : Dallas 1851: 122 |
Cydnus holomelas
| Burmeister 1835: 375 |