Diapherodes jamaicensis (Drury, 1773) Drury, 1773

Frank H. Hennemann, Oskar V. Conle & Daniel E. Perez-Gelabert, 2016, Studies on Neotropical Phasmatodea XVI: Revision of Haplopodini Günther, 1953 (rev. stat.), with notes on the subfamily Cladomorphinae Bradley & Galil, 1977 and the descriptions of a new tribe, four new genera and nine new species (Phasmatodea: “ Anareolatae ”: Phasmatidae: Cladomorphinae), Zootaxa 4128 (1), pp. 1-211 : 94-101

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4128.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B4D2CD84-8994-4CEF-B647-3539C16B6502

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6084948

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/387F3068-D37C-FFE1-FF27-EDD925801F45

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Diapherodes jamaicensis (Drury, 1773)
status

comb. nov.

Diapherodes jamaicensis (Drury, 1773) View in CoL n. comb.

( Figs. 167–182 View FIGURES 167 – 170 View FIGURES 171 – 176 View FIGURES 177 – 182 , 351 View FIGURES 349 – 356 , 371 View FIGURES 365 – 372 , 375 View FIGURES 375 – 376 , 388–391 View FIGURES 388 – 390 View FIGURES 391 – 393 )

Mantis jamaicensis Drury, 1773: 88 , pl. 49: 1 (♂). HT, ♂: Jamaica [not traced—believed lost]. Fabricius, 1787: 227.

Olivier, 1792: 634.

Fabricius, 1793: 15.

Aplopus jamaicensis, Rehn, 1903: 132 .

Brock, 1998b: 33.

Otte & Brock, 2003: 302.

Cyphocrana jamaicensis, St. Fargeau & Audinet-Serville, 1825: 445 .

Diapherodes jamaicensis, Moxey, 1972: 102 View in CoL (in litt.).

Haplopus jamaicensis, Westwood, 1859: 86 .

Kirby, 1904a: 363.

Redtenbacher, 1908: 430.

Otte & Brock, 2005: 151.

Phasma jamaicensis, Fabricius, 1798: 188 View in CoL .

Phasma jamaicense, St. Fargeau & Audinet-Serville, 1825: 101

Phasma (Platycrana) jamaicensis, Westwood, 1837: 99 View in CoL , pl. 44: 1 (♂).

Platycrana jamaicensis, Gray, 1835: 38 View in CoL .

Mantis bispinosa Fabricius, 1775: 274 . LT, ♂: “ America. Mus. Dom. Hunter” [specimen with wings open] [HMUG]; PLT, 2 ♂♂: same data as LT [HMUG]. [Synonymised by Redtenbacher, 1908: 430] Aplopus bispinosus Brock, 1998c: 33 . [Lectotype designation] Gmélin, 1789: 2054.

Olivier, 1792: 633.

Mantis View in CoL 2 spinosa, Fabricius, 1787: 227.

Fabricius, 1793: 15.

Haplopus bispinosus, Westwood, 1859: 87 .

Kirby, 1904a: 430.

Otte & Brock, 2003: 303.

Phasma bispinosa, Fabricius, 1798: 188 View in CoL .

Latreille, 1806: 87.

Phasma bispinosum, Audinet-Serville, 1831: 58 . Gray, 1835: 24.

Haplopus christopheri Westwood, 1859: 84 , pl. 33: 4, 4a (♀). LT (by present designation), ♀: St. Christopheri , W. Indies, E. Shepard; Diapherodes christopheri Westwood View in CoL , p. 84, pl. 33 f4; Type—Westwood, Haplopus christopheri, Cat Phasm.

1859, p. 84, pl. 33 f. 4; Type Orth: 614 1/2, Diapherodes christopheri Westw., Hope Dept. Oxford [OXUM, No. 614]; PLT, ♀: St. Christopher, 1858, W. Indies, E. Shepard; Diapherodes christopheri Westwood, p. 84, pl. 33 f4; Cat Phasm. 1859, p. 84, pl. 33 f. 4; Type Orth: 614 2/2, Diapherodes christopheri Westw., Hope Dept. Oxford [OXUM, No. 614] n. syn.

Diapherodes christopheri, Kirby, 1904a: 462 View in CoL .

Redtenbacher, 1908: 434.

Moxey, 1972: 94 (in litt.).

Otte & Brock, 2005: 120.

Diapherodes glabricollis Gray, 1835: 33 View in CoL . HT, ♀: Type; Haplopus glabricollis G.R. Gray ,—?, glabricollis Gray 108, Diapherodes glabricollis Gray View in CoL , HT; BMNH(E) #844944 [NHMUK]. n. syn. Brock et al., (in press)

Haplopus glabricollis, Westwood, 1859: 88 .

Kirby, 1904a: 364.

Redtenbacher, 1908: 430.

Otte & Brock, 2005: 151.

Diapherodes glabricollis, Burmeister, 1838: 575 View in CoL .

Haplopus murinus Redtenbacher, 1908: 429 . LT, ♀ (by present designation): Coll. Br. v. W., Jamaika, Burr; Det. Br. v. W., Haplopus murinus ; 25.068; Stony Hill, Jamaica, July 29/93, Hwm; Lectotypus, Haplopus murinus Redt., P.D. Brock [NHMW, No. 834]; PLT, ♀: Cuming, Jan., Jamaica, Burr; det. Br. v. W. Haplopus murinus , Paralectotypus, Haplopus murinus Redt., P.D. Brock [NHMW, No. 834]. n. syn.

Aplopus murinus, Brock, 1998a: 44 .

Haplopus murinus, Otte & Brock, 2005: 152 .

Diapherodes murinus, Moxey, 1972: 103 View in CoL (in litt.).

Diapherodes pulverulentus Gray, 1835: 34 View in CoL . HT, ♀: Diapherodes pulverulentus Gray View in CoL ; pulverulentus Gray View in CoL III Haplopus pulverulentus G. R. Gray ;—? Diapherodes pulverulentus Gray View in CoL HT; BMNH(E) #844949 [NHMUK]. n. syn. Brock et al., (in press)

Haplopus pulverulentus, Kirby, 1904a: 364 .

Redtenbacher, 1908: 431.

Otte & Brock, 2005: 152.

Further material [70 ♂♂, 47 ♀♀, 7 nymphs, eggs]:

JAMAICA:

1 ♀ [brown form]: Kingston, Jamaica, C.R. Orcutt.; USMNH; w0214; Diapherodes jamaicensis (Drury) det. C.F. Moxey 1972 [ USNM]; 1 ♀ [brown form]: Jam., Quick Step. nr. Aberdee, VIII.8. '41, W.G. Lynn; USDMNH; w0211; Diapherodes jamaicensis (Drury) det. C.F. Moxey 1972 [ USNM]; 1 ♀: Jamaica, Recd. 1928, C.R. Orcutt; USMNH; w0210; Diapherodes jamaicensis (Drury) det. C.F. Moxey 1972 [ USNM]; 1 ♂: Fellowship Rio Grande, July 27,1962, Farr, O. & R. Flint, Jamaica, Portland Parish; USMNH; Diapherodes jamaicensis (Drury) det. C.F. Moxey 1972 [ USNM]; 1 ♂: Bath, Jamaica, July 1902; Diapherodes jamaicensis (Drury) det. C.F. Moxey 1972 [ USNM]; 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀: Coll. Br. v. W., Jamaica; det. Br. v. W., Haplopus jamaicensis [ NHMW, No. 833]; 1 ♀: Coll. Br. v. W., Jamaica; det. Br. v. W., Haplopus jamaicensis ; Haplopus jamaicensis [18]93 [ NHMW, No. 833]; 1 ♂, 1 ♀: Cumming, Jan. 847; Mus. Caes. Vind., Jamaika, Cumming leg.; det. Redtenb. Haplopus jamaicensis [ NHMW, No. 833]; 1 ♂: Coll. Br. v. W., Jamaica; det. Br. v. W., Haplopus jamaicensis ; 22.767; Haplopus jamaicensis Drury , Jamaica [ NHMW, No. 833]; 1 ♂: Jamaica; 45 110 [ NHMUK]; 1 ♂: Jamaica; 46 84; Haplopus jamaicensis (Drury) , Jamaica [ NHMUK]; 1 ♂: Jamaica; 46 84 [ NHMUK]; 1 ♂, 1 ♀: Jamaica; 61 63 [ NHMUK]; 1 ♂: Jamaica, Mandeville, L. J. Bertram, B. M. 1923-574 [ NHMUK]; 1 nymph (n1): Jamaica 96-220 [ NHMUK]; 1 ♀: Jamaica, Dr. Leon, Brit. Mus. 1922-162, Haplopus murinus Redt., Det. B. Uvarov ♀ [ NHMUK]; 1 ♂: 54 76; Brasil [ NHMUK]; 1 ♀: 34J, Jamaica, Haplopus an foem. Jamaicensis ?, Jamaica [ NHMUK]; 1 ♀: Jamaica: Blaudeville, Da Careret College, 26.V.1969, K. Stanton, B. M. 1969-506, Diapherodes jamaicensis (Drury) det. Moxey 1972 [ NHMUK]; 1 ♂: Jamaica: Portland, Parrish, Millbank, 4-VIII-1985, C.B. & H.V. Weems Jr., G.B. Edwards [ FSCA]; 1 ♀: M. Delfosse, Jamaique, ♀ Elevage 02/04/2005 [ MNHN]; 1 ♀: M. Delfosse, Jamaique, ♀ Elevage 10/04/ 2005 [ MNHN]; 1 ♂: Haplopus jamaicensis T. Jourdan ♂ Elevage 06/2010 [ MNHN]; 5 ♂♂, 6 ♀♀, 3 ♀♀ (nymphs), 1 ♂ (nymph), eggs: ex Zucht: F. Hennemann, urspr. Jamaika, 2000–2002 [coll. FH, No’s 0428-1 to 11, 14 to 16, E & MP]; Right tegmen and ala of ♂: ex Zucht: F. Hennemann, urspr. Jamaika, 2000–2002 [coll. FH, No’s 0428-12 and 13]; 5 ♀♀, 7 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀ (penultimate instar), 1 ♀ (n5), eggs: ex Zucht F. Hennemann 2008/09, Herkunft: Jamaica, Blue Mts., leg. T. & P. James (PSG No. 214) [coll. FH, No’s 0428-17 to 30 & 33]; 2 ♀♀, 6 ♂♂: ex Zucht F. Hennemann 2009, Herkunft: Jamaica, Blue Mts., leg. T. & P. James (PSG No. 214) [coll. FH, No’s 0428-31, 32 & 34-39]; 2 ♀♀, 2 ♂♂: Jamaica, F. Klages; Coll. W. Holland; A.N.S.P., Ex Carn. Mus., Bruner Cln. [ ANSP]; 1 ♂: Jamaica; wO222 [ ANSP]; 1 ♂: Jasmaica; wO217 [ ANSP]; 30 ♂♂, 18 ♀♀, eggs: ex Zucht O. Conle, Herkunft: Jamaika [coll. OC].

NO / ERRONEOUS DATA:

2 ♀♀: Africa, J. E. Teede, B. W. 1928-311 [ NHMUK]; 1 ♂: bispinosum Fab. , 106 [ NHMUK]; 1 ♂: Brazil, 54, 76; Haplopus bispinosus (Fabr.) Brazil [ NHMUK]; 1 ♂: Brazil, 54, 70 [ NHMUK].

Diagnosis: This species differs from the other two representatives of the jamaicensis species-group by the slender body of ♀♀ in particular, which makes it resemble members of the genus Haplopus Burmeister, 1838 , and short alae of ♂♂, which merely reach to abdominal segment VI (VII in the other two species). From the Puerto Rican D. achalus (Rehn, 1904) ♀♀ furthermore differ by the spines and tubercles of the mesonotum and prominent cephalad horns, while they are at once distinguished from the second Jamaican species D. laevicollis Redtenbacher, 1908 by the just gently widened mesothorax, shorter alae, which merely reach half way along the median segment, and not broadly rounded abdominal tergum VII. Males differ from those of D. achalus by the plain green tegmina and anterior spines of the mesonotum and from D. laevicollis by the dorsally brown scapus and pedicellus, more sender body and much shorter terminal hook of the vomer ( Fig. 371 View FIGURES 365 – 372 ).

Description: ♀ ( Figs. 167–170 View FIGURES 167 – 170 , 390–391 View FIGURES 388 – 390 View FIGURES 391 – 393 ). Medium-sized to large (body length including subgenital plate 104.0– 164.5 mm) and moderately slender for the genus with a rather slender and almost parallel-sided abdomen and just slightly widened mesothorax. Colouration very variable and occurring in a green and brown colour-form, which are here described separately i) Green form ( Figs. 167, 169 View FIGURES 167 – 170 , 390 View FIGURES 388 – 390 ): Colour bright apple green, the ventral body surface dull green. Lateral margins of mesonotum ochre, meso- and metapleurae ochre with a white longitudinal stripe along lower margin; membranes along lateral margins of the abdomen whitish. Tegmina and costal region of alae bright green, the anterior margin of tegmina brown and interiorly bordered by an obscure yellow longitudinal stripe; basal portion of alae with a bold brown marking. Anal region of alae plain pink ( Figs. 167–168 View FIGURES 167 – 170 ). Antennae pale brown dorsally, black ventrally and annulated in apical 1/3. Eyes reddish brown. Tips of the anterior mesonotal spines black. ii) Brown form ( Fig. 170 View FIGURES 167 – 170 ): General colour greyish mid brown and often all over furnished with pale grey or whitish mottling and speckles; occasionally washed with some green. Tegmina and costal region of alae mid to purplish dark brown with the venations of a paler colour; anal region of alae dark red to purple with all veins marked by dark brown. Culture stock in Europe occasionally also produces intermediate forms, which are mostly green with the body to a variable degree furnished with well-defined bold chestnut-brown markings or with a brownish wash ( Figs. 168 View FIGURES 167 – 170 , 391 View FIGURES 391 – 393 ).

Head: Indistinctly longer than wide, strongly globose with cheeks parallel-sided. Vertex convex, covered with a variable number of differently sized tubercles and in centre armed with two ± prominent, pointed or blunt, conical horns; the dextral one carinate and the sinistral one considerably smaller ( Figs. 173–174 View FIGURES 171 – 176 ). Near posterior margin usually with a transverse row of four spiniform tubercles, the exterior ones sometimes enlarged. Often two further small granules are present on the cheeks. Eyes of moderate size, sub-circular and their length contained about 2x in that of cheeks. Antennae slightly projecting over posterior margin of metanotum; consisting of about 45 antennomeres. Scapus dorsoventrally compressed, roundly rectangular and about 1.5x longer than wide. Pedicellus cylindrical, sub-spherical and less than half the length of scapus. Third antennomere slightly shorter than pedicellus.

Thorax: Pronotum slightly shorter and narrower than head, 1.3x longer than wide, gently constricted medially and with the anterior margin slightly widened. Transverse median depression distinct, slightly curved and almost reaching lateral margins of segment. Surface close to posterior margin with a pair of minute spiniform tubercles and in centre often with four small tubercles, which roughly form a square ( Figs. 173–174 View FIGURES 171 – 176 ). Mesothorax about 1.6x longer than head and pronotum combined, constricted anteriorly and gently widened towards the posterior. Mesonotum with a very faint longitudinal median carina and covered with a variable number of tubercles, which become more distinct towards the lateral margins and less numerous towards the posterior of segment; anteriorly with 1–3 pairs of ± prominent, forward directed spines ( Figs. 173–174 View FIGURES 171 – 176 ). Mesopleurae with a marginal row of 8–14 spiniform tubercles; metapleurae smooth or with a few small tubercles. Meso- and metasternum sparsely granulose. Tegmina oval, scale-like, with a very shallow central hump and very slightly projecting over posterior margin of metanotum. Alae slightly shorter than tegmina and reaching about half way along median segment.

Abdomen: Median segment longer than metanotum, 1.3x longer than wide and very gently widening towards the posterior; smooth. Segments II–VII almost parallel-sided and of uniform length, about 1.3x longer than wide; III and IV slightly broader than remaining. Tergites II and III occasionally with two small spine-like projections at posterior margin, II–VI otherwise smooth except for a few scattered granules. VI with two and VII with four fine longitudinal carinae. Lateral margins of VII slightly expanded posteriorly and forming a narrow, triangular lobe or tooth. Sternites II–VII smooth except for two very faint and short sub-parallel carinae close to posterior margin. Praeopercular organ formed by an elongate brown median hump close to posterior margin of sternum VII ( Fig. 351 View FIGURES 349 – 356 ). Tergites VIII–X roughly equal in width and considerably narrower than previous segments. VIII about 2/3 the length of VII and slightly constricted medially, IX quadrate and about 2/3 the length of VIII. Anal segment about as long as IX, with a slight longitudinal median carina, the posterior margin rounded and with a very small median indentation ( Fig. 178 View FIGURES 177 – 182 ). Epiproct slightly projecting over anal segment, shield shaped and roughly semi-circular with a keel dorsally ( Fig. 178 View FIGURES 177 – 182 ). Cerci very small, round in cross-section and conical with the apex pointed. Subgenital plate elongate and variable in length, lanceolate, longitudinally keeled and narrowed towards a rather acute apex; projecting over apex of abdomen by more than the length of anal segment ( Figs. 177–178 View FIGURES 177 – 182 ).

Legs: All rather short and stocky. Profemora and mesofemora shorter than mesothorax, metafemora slightly projecting over posterior margin of abdominal segment III. Medioventral carina of profemora with 2–3 spines in apical portion, mesofemora with 4–6 and metafemora with 5–8 spines. Dorsal carinae of meso- and metafemora each with a ± prominent triangular lobe sub-apically (less distinct or sometimes lacking on metafemora), the posteroventral carina with one and the anteroventral carina with two pointed sub-apical spines. Anterodorsal carina of meso- and metatibiae occasionally with a ± distinct rounded to roundly triangular sub-basal and sub-apical expansion. Medioventral carina raised and rounded sub-basally and armed with a few small teeth in apical portion. Basitarsi about as long as following two tarsomeres combined.

♂ ( Figs. 171–172 View FIGURES 171 – 176 , 388–389 View FIGURES 388 – 390 ). Of moderate size (body length 63.0–94.0 mm) and rather slender for the jamaicensis species-group with well developed alae (32.0– 53.5 mm); body surface sub-glabrous. General colouration bright green, the mesonotum with a slight yellowish wash. Tegmina green with a bold longitudinal white stripe along anterior margin. Costal region of alae slightly translucent green with a white longitudinal stripe running along the basal 1/3 of the anterior margin. Anal region translucent pink to orange ( Fig. 171 View FIGURES 171 – 176 ). Eyes reddish brown. Antennae reddish mid brown with the three or four basal antennomeres black ventrally. Pedicellus usually darker brown than all other antennomeres. Anterior spines of the mesonotum often black. Bases of all femora and tibiae ochre. Tarsi greenish brown.

Head: Similar in shape to ♀♀ but vertex much less convex and smooth except for two rounded unequal cephalad humps and two blunt tubercles close to the posterior margin; sometimes also with a few minute granules ( Figs. 175–176 View FIGURES 171 – 176 ). Eyes very prominent, sub-circular and projecting hemispherically; their length contained hardly more than once in length of cheeks. Antennae projecting over posterior margin of abdominal segment II and moderately robust; consisting of 57–60 antennomeres. Scapus oval in cross-section, roundly rectangular and about 1.3x longer than wide. Pedicellus cylindrical and about 2/3 the length of scapus.

Thorax: Pronotum somewhat shorter and narrower than the head, slightly trapezoidal and gradually narrowed towards the posterior; the posterior margin gently rounded. Median transverse depression distinct, gently curved and almost reaching lateral margin of segment. Surface smooth ( Figs. 175–176 View FIGURES 171 – 176 ). Mesothorax about 2x longer than head and pronotum combined, mesonotum mostly with 1–4 pairs of prominent black, forward directed anterior spines ( Figs. 175–176 View FIGURES 171 – 176 ); rarely lacking. Posterior 2/3 of mesonotum and mesosternum sometimes with a few minute granules. Meso- and metapleurae as well as metasternum smooth. Tegmina elongate, oval, reaching 1/3 along median segment and with a blunt central protuberance, which is slightly displaced towards the anterior . Alae reaching to abdominal tergum VI.

Abdomen: Median segment gently narrowed towards the posterior. Segments II–VII parallel-sided and gradually decreasing in length; II 3.5x, VII 2.5x longer than wide. Sternites II–VII smooth. Tergum VIII ¾ the length of VII, widened towards the posterior and slightly tectate. IX ¾ the length of VIII, about as long as wide and very slightly narrowed towards the posterior. Anal segment about as long as IX with a slight longitudinal median carina, the posterior portion narrowed and rounded on both sides of the triangular median emargination ( Fig. 180 View FIGURES 177 – 182 ). Vomer with the base rather broad and roundly triangular, the terminal hook slightly up-curving and almost as long as basal portion ( Fig. 371 View FIGURES 365 – 372 ). Cerci almost as long as anal segment, slender, narrowed towards a blunt apex and very slightly in-curving ( Fig. 371 View FIGURES 365 – 372 ). Poculum convex, cymbiform, longitudinally carinate and with the posterior margin distinctly indented and bi-lobate medially ( Fig. 179 View FIGURES 177 – 182 ).

Legs: Generally as in ♀♀ but relatively longer, more slender and lacking the dorsal armature of the meso- and metafemora and tibiae. Profemora roughly equal, mesofemora slightly shorter than mesothorax, metafemora reaching about half way along abdominal segment IV. Basitarsi a little longer than following two tarsomeres combined.

Nymphs: Newly hatched nymphs are bright yellowish green with brown antennae. Later instars and ♀ nymphs in particular tend to be various shades of brown rather than green like the adults. From 3rd instar on the lateral margins of tergum VII are conspicuously elevated and form a rounded lobe. The sub-apical dorsal teeth of the meso- and metafemora and dorsal elevations of the tibiae of ♀ nymphs are more prominent than in adults. ♂ nymphs may have small granules on the mesonotum. ♀ nymphs are very similar in general appearance to those of certain Haplopus -species.

Variability: While ♂♂ merely show variability in the size and number of anterior spines of the mesonotum ( Figs. 175–176 View FIGURES 171 – 176 ), ♀♀ exhibit considerable variability in several aspects. Features generally showing variation are the number and size of the anterior spines of the mesonotum and armature of the head ( Figs. 173–174 View FIGURES 171 – 176 ), length of the subgenital plate and degree of the anterior armature of the mid and hind legs. Despite these morphological features ♀♀ occur in two distinct colour-forms described in detail above, which has caused the description of several synonyms. Specimens of the more common green form ( Figs. 167, 169 View FIGURES 167 – 170 , 390 View FIGURES 388 – 390 ) are averaging smaller than specimens of the more rarely encountered brown form ( Fig. 170 View FIGURES 167 – 170 ). Culture stock in Europe occasionally also produces green intermediate forms which are to a variable degree prettily furnished with rather geometrical chestnut-brown markings and possess a brownish hue all over the body ( Fig. 168 View FIGURES 167 – 170 , 391 View FIGURES 391 – 393 ).

Egg ( Figs. 181–182 View FIGURES 177 – 182 ): The following description is based on a large number of eggs in the first author's collection (coll. FH) laid by captive reared specimens.

Rather small, capsule 1.8x longer than wide and with dorsal surface more convex than ventral surface; polararea decidedly impressed if seen in lateral aspect. Capsule surface irregularly covered with raised ridge-like structures, tubercles and granules; a rather blunt longitudinal keel running from the micropylar plate to the polararea. Micropylar plate small, roughly heart-shaped and its length contained about 2.6x in that of capsule. Central portion of micropylar plate granulose, micropylar cup distinct and placed in posteromedian gap of plate. Operculum with a rim of irregularly raised tubercles; centre slightly lowered. General colour pale to mid brown, the outer margin of the micropylar plate and micropylar cup dark brown.

Measurements [mm]: Length 3.5–3.8, length (including operculum) 3.7–4.0, width 2.0–2.2, height 2.1–2.3, length of micropylar plate 1.3–1.4.

Comments: Drury's illustration of the ♂ HT does not show the anterior spines on the mesonotum mostly present and a very variable feature in D. jamaicensis . There are several old specimens in the collection NHMUK but none of these could be confirmed as Drury's holotype (personal communication with J. Marshall and P.D. Brock). Hence, the designation of a neotype may become necessary, but this deserves further evaluation and research in other collections, which are likely to contain specimens examined by Drury.

Diapherodes glabricollis Gray, 1835 was described from the ♀ and is the opposite sex of Drury's species (n. syn.). Examination of the holotype of Diapherodes christopheri Westwood, 1859 in OXUM leaves no doubt it is conspecific with D. jamaicensis (Drury) (n. syn.). The type-locality “St. Christopher” [= St. Kitts] is however very doubtful and most certainly erroneous. Former authors distinguished D. christopheri from D. jamaicensis by the smooth metapleurae, which however is a variable feature in ♀♀ of jamaicensis . Both, D. pulverulentus Gray, 1835 and H. murinus Redtenbacher, 1908 are ♀♀ of the brown form of D. jamaicensis , hence also synonyms (n. syn.).

D. jamaicensis is being successfully reared in captivity in Europe from stock imported by Tony and Pat James ( England) in the late 1990's and has subsequently been included on the Phasmid Study Group culture-list as culture No. 214 “ Haplopus jamaicensis ”. It readily accepts oak ( Quercus robur & Q. petraea , Fagaceae ), eucalyptus ( Eucalytus gunnii , Myrtaceae ), bramble ( Rubus fruticosus , Rosaceae ), raspberry ( Rubus idaeus , Rosaceae ), rose ( Rosa spp., Rosaceae ), salal ( Gaultheria shallon , Ericaceae ) and guava ( Psidium guajava , Myrtaceae ) as alternative food plants and does well in moderately humid but well ventilated conditions. If adults are disturbed, both ♀♀ and ♂♂ will spread their pink hindwings. Males are very quick moving and capable of active flight. Mating usually takes place at night.

Distribution: Jamaica: Batia [ANSP]; Bath [USNM]; Liguanea Plain [MCZC; Moxey, 1972: 104, in litt.]; Quick Step nr. Aberdeen [USNM]; St. James, Montego Bay [NHMJ; Moxey, 1972: 104, in litt.]; Snug Harbour [ANSP]; Fountain Hill [NHMJ; Moxey, 1972: 104, in litt.]; Trelawny, Westwood [NHMJ; Moxey, 1972: 104, in litt.]; Manchester, Mandeville [NHMJ; Moxey, 1972: 104, in litt.]; Christiana [AMNH; Moxey, 1972: 104, in litt.]; St. Mary, Castleton Gardens [MCZC, Moxey, 1972: 104, in litt.]; St. Catherine, Boston Town Postal Agency [NHMJ; Moxey, 1972: 104, in litt.]; St. Andrew; Hermitage Reservoir [NHMJ; Moxey, 1972: 104, in litt.]; Blaudeville [NHMUK]; Cinchona [AMNH; Moxey, 1972: 104, in litt.]; Kingston [USNM]; Portland, Millbank [FSCA] & Portland Parish, Fellowship Rio Grande [USNM, NHMJ, Moxey, 1972: 104, in litt.]. Endemic.

Number of specimens examined: 134

......continued on the next page ** metanotum + median segment

USNM

Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History

NHMW

Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien

NHMUK

Natural History Museum, London

FSCA

Florida State Collection of Arthropods, The Museum of Entomology

MNHN

Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle

ANSP

Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Phasmida

Family

Phasmatidae

Tribe

Cranidiini

Genus

Diapherodes

Loc

Diapherodes jamaicensis (Drury, 1773)

Frank H. Hennemann, Oskar V. Conle & Daniel E. Perez-Gelabert 2016
2016
Loc

Haplopus murinus

Otte & Brock 2005: 152
2005
Loc

Aplopus bispinosus

Brock 1998: 33
1998
Loc

Aplopus murinus

Brock 1998: 44
1998
Loc

Diapherodes jamaicensis

Moxey 1972: 102
1972
Loc

Diapherodes murinus

Moxey 1972: 103
1972
Loc

Haplopus murinus

Redtenbacher 1908: 429
1908
Loc

Diapherodes christopheri

Kirby 1904: 462
1904
Loc

Haplopus pulverulentus

Kirby 1904: 364
1904
Loc

Aplopus jamaicensis

Rehn 1903: 132
1903
Loc

Haplopus jamaicensis

Westwood 1859: 86
1859
Loc

Haplopus bispinosus

Westwood 1859: 87
1859
Loc

Haplopus christopheri

Westwood 1859: 84
1859
Loc

Haplopus glabricollis

Westwood 1859: 88
1859
Loc

Diapherodes glabricollis

Burmeister 1838: 575
1838
Loc

Phasma (Platycrana) jamaicensis

Westwood 1837: 99
1837
Loc

Platycrana jamaicensis

Gray 1835: 38
1835
Loc

Diapherodes glabricollis

Gray 1835: 33
1835
Loc

Diapherodes pulverulentus

Gray 1835: 34
1835
Loc

Phasma bispinosum

Audinet-Serville 1831: 58
1831
Loc

Cyphocrana jamaicensis

St. Fargeau & Audinet-Serville 1825: 445
1825
Loc

Phasma jamaicense

St. Fargeau & Audinet-Serville 1825: 101
1825
Loc

Phasma jamaicensis

Fabricius 1798: 188
1798
Loc

Phasma bispinosa

Fabricius 1798: 188
1798
Loc

Mantis bispinosa

Fabricius 1775: 274
1775
Loc

Mantis jamaicensis

Drury 1773: 88
1773
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF