Elaeocarpus angustifolius Blume, Bijdr. Fl. Ned. Ind.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24823/EJB.2022.1911 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13273253 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3725A61D-FFF1-FF80-3516-63CE3918FBFF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Elaeocarpus angustifolius Blume, Bijdr. Fl. Ned. Ind. |
status |
|
Elaeocarpus angustifolius Blume, Bijdr. Fl. Ned. Ind. View in CoL (3): 120 (1825). – Type: C.L. Blume
2160/ C (lectotype L [ L0014015 ], designated at the first step by Tirel & Raynal, Adansonia 20: 176 [1980], and at the second step here; isolectotype L [ L0014016 ]) .
Elaeocarpus ganitrus Roxb. ex G.Don, Gen. Hist. View in CoL 1: 559 (1831). – Ganitrus roxburghii Wight, Ill. Ind. Bot. View in CoL 1: 83 (1838). – Type: [published illustration] ‘Ganitrus’, Rumphius, Herb. Amb. 3: t. 101 (1743) (lectotype designated here).
Ganitrus roxburghii Wight View in CoL stands as a replacement name for Elaeocarpus ganitrus Roxb. ex G.Don View in CoL because the tautonym created by a direct transfer of the basionym would be invalid. Don cited Rumphius’s plate in his protologue but made no mention of specimens. I therefore select the Rumphius plate as lectotype.
C |
University of Copenhagen |
L |
Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Leiden University branch |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Elaeocarpus angustifolius Blume, Bijdr. Fl. Ned. Ind.
Turner, Ian M. 2022 |
Ganitrus roxburghii Wight, Ill. Ind. Bot.
Wight 1838: 83 |
Elaeocarpus ganitrus Roxb. ex G.Don, Gen. Hist.
G. Don 1831: 559 |