Trichromia onytes (Cramer, [1777])
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5071.2.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8EAA5458-0B7D-40FB-9A85-C28095FB2F55 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5729691 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/357987BD-FF96-FF8E-68B5-82D4FD81FB5F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Trichromia onytes (Cramer, [1777]) |
status |
|
Trichromia onytes (Cramer, [1777])
Figs. 6–9 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 . BIN: BOLD:AAG6256 (dx.doi.org/10.5883/BOLD:AAG6256)
Cramer described Phalaena Noctua onytes from Surinam ( Cramer [1777], pp. 107, 150, plate 165E) and Sphinx Adscita psamas Cramer, [1779] from Guyana ( Berbice) and Suriname ( Cramer [1779], pp. 72, 176, plate 234G). We are not aware of any surviving type material (Cramer gives no details for P. onytes , while P. psamas was from the collection of Mr. A. Gevers), but Cramer’s figures ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ) serve to recognise both taxa; the dark grey hindwing in particular is distinctive.
Hampson (1901) placed them both in the genus Neritos Walker, 1855 , with psamas as the male of the female onytes . However, he subsequently realised that he had misidentified the male that he had used to illustrate the male of this species (i.e. Hampson 1901, Fig. 100) and described it as N. macrostidza Hampson, 1905 ( Hampson 1905, 1920). In the same works, Hampson maintained N. psamas as the male of N. onytes , noted that in the male the yellow patches on costa and termen may be confluent or separate, and gave the distribution as Panama, Guyana, French Guiana, Bolivia and Peru.
Rothschild (1910) held a different opinion and recognised N. psammas [sic] which he knew only from males from Trinidad and the Guianas, and N. onytes which he knew only from females from Suriname and British Guiana. However, Seitz (1920–1925) followed Hampson (1905, 1920) but added that the female as well as the male occurs with the yellow spots both separate and joined.
Watson and Goodger (1986) reinstated Neritos psamas as a valid species, and placed onytes in Trichromia Hübner, [1819] , of which it is the type species. They offered no explanation for the former action, but explained that most of the species placed in Neritos in their list would need to be transferred to Trichromia . Toulgoet (1991) clarified the composition of Trichromia , made Neritos a synonym and made the new combination Trichromia psamas . There have been no subsequent changes and both species are currently treated as valid and placed in Trichromia ( Vincent and Laguerre 2014) . Through these different changes, no one reported examining and comparing the genitalia of T. psamas and T. onytes . There are public barcodes for T. onytes in BOLD from Brazil and French Guiana (BIN BOLD:AAG6256) and both morphs are included in this BIN (dx.doi.org/10.5883/BOLD:AAG6256).
In Trinidad and French Guiana, we have observed that T. onytes and T. psamas are the two principle morphs of a single variable species that occurs with the yellow discal forewing band uninterrupted ( Fig. 7A–B View FIGURE 7 ), with it split by the apical patch being joined to the basal-discal one ( Figs. 7C, E–F View FIGURE 7 , 8B View FIGURE 8 ), and occasionally as in intermediate morph with the band only very narrowly interrupted ( Figs. 7D View FIGURE 7 , 8A View FIGURE 8 ). We compared dissections of males of both main morphs from Trinidad and French Guiana and found the genitalia to be identical ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ). Noting also the occurrence of intermediate morphs, it is clear that Hampson (1901, 1905, 1920) and Seitz (1920–1925) were right, and the two names are synonyms, T. psamas being a syn. rev. of T. onytes . Where it is useful to distinguish these two morphs, they may be referred to as onytes morph and psamas morph.
Material examined. Trichromia onytes onytes morph: FRENCH GUIANA: 2♂ Piste de Kaw, PK 36, 6– 7.viii.1994 [ ML one ♂ dissected Gen. ML3370 ]. ♂ Piste de Kaw, PK 41, 25.i.1996 [ ML]. 2♀ Piste de Kaw , PK 38, 19.i.1996; 3♀ same data but 20.i.1996 [ ML]. ♀ Piste de Kaw , PK 36, 6.viii.1994 [ ML]. 2♀ Piste de Kaw , PK 36, 11 & 13.viii.1994 [ ML]. TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO, TRINIDAD: Arima Valley, Simla, MVL: ♂, ♀ 28.ix.1981 (M.J.W. Cock) [ MJWC]. Balandra, at light: ♂ 21.viii.1969 (F.D. Bennett) [ UWIZM CABI.1124]. Cumaca Road, 4.6 miles, MVL: ♀ 18.vii.1981 (M.J.W. Cock) [ MJWC]; ♂, 2♀ 21.x.1982 (M.J.W. Cock) [ MJWC]. Curepe, MVL trap: ♀ i.1971 (R.E. Cruttwell) [ UWIZM CABI.1122]. Morne Bleu, Textel Installation, at light: ♀ 5.ix.1978 [ UWIZM CABI.1127]. Rio Claro-Guayaguayare Road , milestone 6.5, MVL: ♀ 30.ix.1978 (M.J.W. Cock) [ UWIZM CABI.1126]. Valencia Forest , MVL: ♂ 31.vii.1980 (M.J.W. Cock) [ MJWC, dissection 1105]; ♀ 5.viii.1981 (M.J.W. Cock) [ MJWC]. VENEZUELA: ♂, ♀ Bolivar, Road El Dorado - Sta Elena, PK 38, 16.viii. 1996, 200 m [ ML] .
Trichromia onytes psamas morph: FRENCH GUIANA: 3♂ Piste de Kaw, PK 36, 5–6.viii.1994 [ ML]. 2♂ Piste de Kaw, PK 38, 19.i.1996 [ ML, one ♂ dissected Gen. ML3371 ]. 2♂ Piste de Kaw , PK 37, layon km 3.3, 24.vii.2001 [ ML]. ♂ Piste de Kaw , PK 38, 21.i.1996 [ ML]. ♂ Piste de Kaw , PK 38, 10.ii.1999 [ ML]. VENEZUELA: ♂ Bolivar, Road El Dorado - Sta Elena , 6.viii.1995, PK 70, 250 m [ ML]. ♂ Bolivar, Road El Dorado - Sta Elena, PK 38, 16.viii. 1996, 200 m [ ML]. ♂ Bolivar, Road El Dorado - Sta Elena, PK 13, 5.viii. 1995, 100 m [ ML]. TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO, TRINIDAD: Arima Valley, Simla, MVL: ♂ 5.v.1989 (R.G. Brown) [ UWIZM CABI.1123]. Caparo: 2♂ xi.1905 (S.M. Klages) [ NHMUK]. Chatham: ♂ 5.i.1985 (M. Alkins) [ UWIZM.2014.9.1291]. Cumaca Road, 0.5 miles, MVL: ♂ 27.x.1980 (M.J.W. Cock) [ MJWC]. Cumaca Road, 4.6 miles, MVL: ♂ 18.vii.1981 (M.J.W. Cock) [ MJWC, dissection 1106]; 1♂ 21.x.1982 (M.J.W. Cock) [ UWIZM CABI.8017]. Hollis Reservoir, at light: ♂ 2.xi.1978 (M.J.W. Cock) [ UWIZM CABI.1121]. Morne Bleu, Textel Installation, at light: ♂ 20.ix.1978 (M.J.W. Cock) [ MJWC]. Valencia Forest , MVL: ♂ 31.vii.1980 (M.J.W. Cock) [ UWIZM CABI.1125] .
Trichromia onytes intermediate morph: TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO, TRINIDAD: Balandra , at light: ♂ viii.1970 (F.D. Bennett) [ UWIZM CABI.1128]. Caparo: ♂ (S.M. Klages) [ NHMUK]. Inniss Field, MVL: ♂ 17.v.1999 (M.J.W. Cock) [ MJWC] .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |