Nanochromis wickleri, Schliewen & Stiassny, 2006

Schliewen, Ulrich K. & Stiassny, Melanie L. J., 2006, A new species of Nanochromis (Teleostei: Cichlidae) from Lake Mai Ndombe, central Congo Basin, Democratic Republic of Congo, Zootaxa 1169, pp. 33-46 : 35-43

Nanochromis wickleri , new species

( Figs. 1–3 )

Holotype ( Fig. 1a, b ). ZSM 29695, male, 70.01 mm SL; Democratic Republic of Congo, Bandundu province: Lake Mai Ndombe at Inongo south of harbour (1°56´30´´S, 18°16´15´´E), 29 th July to 4 th August 2002, U. Schliewen.

Paratypes ( Fig. 2a, b ). ZSM 29696, female, 52.6mm SL; AMNH 236665 , male, 50.2 mm SL; ZSM 33989, cleared and stained, 23.0–49.2 mm SL; AMNH 236666 , cleared and stained, 44.7 mm SL; all paratypes with same locality and collection data as holotype .

Diagnosis

A large, deep­bodied species of Nanochromis , that differs from all congeners in possessing an elevated soft dorsal fin ray count (10–11 vs. 5–8) and the presence, in adults, of strongly produced membranous fin lappets on the second and third dorsal fin spines. Nannochromis wickleri is further distinguished from N. squamiceps , N. dimidiatus and N. sabinae in having an almost scaleless cheek and nape (vs. fully scaled cheek and nape), most of the upper lateral line contiguous with the dorsal fin base (vs. only the last few scales contiguous), five laterosensory pores on the dentary (vs. 4), a tubular pore canal in the anguloarticular (vs. no canal), and seven laterosensory pores on the preopercle (vs. 6). In addition to dorsal fin features it differs from N. parilus by the absence of a prominent light submargin beneath a black margin on the dorsal fin and the upper edge of the caudal fin; from N. consortus in the profile of the spinous dorsal fin which increases regularly in height from the very short first to the last dorsal spine in N. consortus , but steeply over the first 3 spines in N. wickleri , and by never having a prominent black margin in the anal fin; from N. splendens in being deeper bodied (BD 25.6–28.1 % SL vs. 20.4–24.9 % SL); from N. transvestitus and N. minor in having a higher midlateral scale count (26 vs. 23–25) and in lacking prominent vertical white bands ( N. transvestitus ) or an horizontal dark band ( N. minor ) on the caudal fin in females. Finally it differs from the lectotype and single known specimen of N. nudiceps in a higher gill raker count on the first gill arch (18–20 vs. 14), a longer and narrower caudal peduncle (CPl 10.9–14.4 vs. 9.4 % SL; CPd 10.4–11.7 vs. 12.7 % SL), and a slightly higher midlateral scale count (27 vs. 26) (for a full comparison with that specimen see Table 1 ).

Description

Based on the holotype and 8 paratypes. See Table 1 for a summary of morphometric and meristic data, and Figs. 1–2 for general aspect. A large, relatively deep­bodied Nanochromis bearing a superficial resemblance to cichlids of the Lake Tanganyikan genus Xenotilapia . Snout long with a steeply inclined and strongly convex dorsal contour and an almost straight ventral contour. Mouth large, lip fold of the African­type, lower lip fold continous over symphysis ( Stiassny 1987). Maxilla extending to vertical from slightly posterior to anterior margin of orbit. Eye large, supralaterally positioned, its dorsal margin projecting slightly beyond predorsal contour, iris ovoid. Greatest body depth at about the base of third or fourth dorsal spine (25.6–28.1, mean 26.8% SL). Head length 30.1–33.9, mean 32.0 % SL. Dorsal body profile convex, curving gently downward along the length of the dorsal fin base to the slender (CPd 10.4–11.7, mean 11.1% SL) caudal peduncle.

Squamation. Opercle, interopercle, subopercle, and postorbital region naked except for a few vestigial scales deeply embedded along the upper anterior margin of the opercle; flank scales cycloid, ovoid with long axis vertical; Upper lateral line originates at the occipital margin of the opercle, ascends to the dorsal fin base where it reaches its highest point at the 6 th pored scale and continues with half an intervening scale or no scale distance to the dorsal fin base to the level of the 5 th or 6 th soft dorsal ray. Upper lateral line (Upl) separated from the lower lateral line (Lll) by 2 scales (excluding pored rows); overlaps Lll by 1 scale or is contiguous; scales in front of 6 th pored scales above the Upl much smaller than flank scales, occipital region naked; ventral and lateral chest and interpelvic region naked; belly scales smaller than flank scales with a gradual transition; scales in ventral portion of the belly and in anal­genital region very small; anteriormost portion of caudal fin with minute scales and one large pore­bearing scale.

Fins. Dorsal fin high; with XVI–XVII (mode XVI) spines and 10–11 (mode 11) rays. Anal fin with III spines and 8 soft rays. First three dorsal fin spines gradually increase in length, the following spines approximately equal in length. In the male holotype, the first three lappets are produced, pointed and are free, those of the second and third lappets are significantly longer (approximately half of the corresponding spine length) than the first. The fourth and subsequent lappets are also somewhat produced. In paratypes>45.0 mm SL (two males, two females) fin lappets are similarly produced although somewhat less markedly so. In the remaining specimens no elongation of dorsal fin lappets is visible. Soft dorsal and anal fins in larger males including the holotype are pointed, extending slightly beyond caudal fin base, in smaller specimens they are not obviously pointed or produced. Caudal fin longer than deep, subacuminate, with fin rays increasing in length from the outer rays towards the central rays. Pelvic fin with thick spine and first ray longest, reaching almost to the anal fin base. Pectoral fin rounded reaching vertical approximately at the midpoint of the spinous dorsal fin.

Gill rakers. Fifteen to 16 small, tuberculate gill rakers on the outer row of the lower limb of the first gill arch, a somewhat larger and more elongate raker in the angle of the arch, and 3 bulbous epibranchial rakers ( Fig. 3a ). All rakers on the lower limb are deeply embedded in highly folded, pachydermous tissue making it difficult to take an accurate count of rakers in the outer row. However, the rakers are readily visualized in cleared and stained specimens and from a count of the corresponding rakers along the inner row of the first arch. In common with most other chromidotilapiine cichlids a prominent visor­like, hanging pharyngeal pad is developed on the 2 nd epibranchial, and no microbranchiospines are present on the outer faces of the 2 nd, 3rd, or 4 th gill arches.

Teeth. Outer row dentition on both premaxilla and dentary composed of extremely gracile, slightly recurved, elongate, unicuspid teeth ( Fig. 3b ). All teeth are pointed, closeset and evenly spaced along each jaw, the 3–4 teeth at the premaxillary symphysis are somewhat enlarged and procumbently implanted. A single, short row of strongly recurved inner row teeth is present anteriorly in both jaws.

Lower pharyngeal jaw (LPJ). Extremely gracile, with narrow horns and a short blunt keel. The dentigerous surface is sparsely covered with fine weakly bicuspid teeth. The posterior row LPJ teeth are elongate, erect, closely spaced bicuspids with a strong hooked major cusp and a smaller minor cusp. Anteriorly the LPJ teeth are weakly erect, somewhat shouldered, unicuspids ( Fig. 3c ).

Vertebrae. All specimens exhibit a formula of 14+14(28) vertebrae.

Miscellaneous osteology. As in all Nanochromis the lachrymal has four sensory canal pores and is followed by only a single, elongate infraorbital (IO2) element ( Fig. 3d ). The laterosensory canal in the dentary is perforated by 5 pores, a tubular canal is present in the anguloarticular, and there are 7 pores in the preopercular canal ( Fig. 3b ).

Color pattern in alcohol

Ground color beige brown. Anterior ventral and central free part of individual dorsal flank scales of row 0 and E1 with narrow black pigment band creating a pattern of oblique black stripes, which are more pronounced in rows E1 than in row 0. In row E2 and E3 the black margin includes the dorsal part of the anterior margin creating a reticulate pattern below the dorsal fin base. Dorsal fin membranes between the spines beige with dusky hue, free dorsal fin lappets black; soft dorsal and caudal fin with a thin black margin, fin membranes of caudal part of soft dorsal fin and upper two thirds of caudal fin with alternating light and dark maculae creating a striped patterning. Anal fin dusky grey. Pelvic fin membranes white in males and juveniles, but dusky grey to blackish in the two large females. Pectorals translucent with a thin grey margin in the caudal part. Lips white; snout, interorbital and occipital region grey, branchiostegal membranes whitish. Dark outer spot at the outer edge of opercle (“opercular spot”) present. Dorsal margin of the eye above the iris black, iris dark grey except for a small light colored area in the ventral portion. The two large females with a whitish area around the genital papilla and a broad reddish brown pigment patch extending from above this whitish area to the vicinity of scale row 0. In addition, the two large females exhibit a much less pronounced pattern of black scale and fin pigmentation resulting in a more uniform overall impression.

Color in life

Based on field photographs of the living male holotype, the second largest male and largest female paratype (see Fig. 1 b–2b, c). Similar to coloration in alcohol except that overall body color is bluish­grey with a metallic hue in the dorsal half of the flanks; the inner margin of the iris is white and a small patch in the ventral part as well as in the frontal part of the iris is strongly reflective (depending on light conditions); the frontal parts of the lips are slightly metallic blue­green. The large female has a white chest and a rosy preanal region and violet­rosy reflective patch above the white part of the belly. No indications of black margins of the anal fin, upper portion of caudal fin and dorsal fin. Pelvic fins white.

Geographical distribution Known only from the type locality ( Fig. 4 ), Lake Mai Ndombe at Inongo south of the harbour (1°56´30´´S, 18°16´15´´E).

Local name Ipoli­apoj, a name applied to all Nanochromis at Inongo.

Habitat

The type locality and single collection site is at a sandy beach interspersed with flat laterite terraces south of the port of Lake Mai Ndombe. The type series was collected with a large beach seine net (locally called “nziga”) consisting of a terminal sac made of thin cotton cloth and wide meshed lateral nets, that was set approx. 100 m offshore at a water depth of approx. 1–2 m with the help of pirogues. Lake Mai Ndombe is a shallow blackwater lake (average depth 3 m) with strongly acidic (pH 4.0), tea­colored water of high humic content ( Stewart & Roberts 1984, Thieme et al. 2005). Light penetration is extremely low and already in 1 m depth there is almost complete darkness even in bright sunlight at midday. N. wickleri lives sympatrically with N. transvestitus , which however was collected and observed at several sites around Inongo and which appears to be more common than N. wickleri . Sites where N. transvestitus were collected always contained laterite stones distributed over sandy areas and included shallow water (<1 m depth), whereas flat large laterite terraces were found only at the type locality of N. wickleri at a depth between 1 and 2 m.

Etymology

Named for Wolfgang Wickler in recognition of his behavioral studies of cichlids in general and of benthic Congolese cichlids in particular. As a former director of the Max­ Planck­Institut for Behavioral Physiology in Seewiesen ( Germany) W. Wickler generously supported studies on central African cichlid fishes conducted by UKS.

Relationships

Two species groups are discernable within Nanochromis as it is currently conceived, one, referred to here as the “ squamiceps ­group”, consists of species with only the last 3–5 pored scales of the upper lateral line contiguous with the dorsal fin base, a completely scaled belly and nape, a partially scaled chest and cheek, and a supraneural bone. Members of the squamiceps group additionally have 4 laterosensory pores on the dentary, are lacking a tubular pore canal in the anguloarticular, and have six laterosensory pores on the preopercle, features considered synapomorphic for the squamiceps group (Stiassny and Schliewen in prep.). Currently three species belonging to the squamiceps ­group are recognized: N. squamiceps ( Boulenger, 1902) , N. dimidiatus ( Pellegrin, 1900) and N. sabinae Lamboj, 2005 . The second group, referred to here as the “ nudiceps ­group”, contains six described species each with at least the posterior half of the upper lateral line contiguous with the dorsal fin base, a completely scaleless nape, cheek and belly, and no supraneural bone present in most individuals. Members of the nudiceps ­group retain a plesiomorphic condition of the cephalic laterosensory system with 5 laterosensory pores on the dentary, a tubular pore canal in the anguloarticular, and 7 laterosensory pores on the preopercle. Members of the nudiceps ­group are: N. nudiceps ( Boulenger, 1899) , N. parilus Roberts & Stewart, 1976 , N. consortus Roberts & Stewart, 1976 , N. transvestitus Stewart & Roberts, 1984 and N. splendens Roberts & Stewart, 1976 and N. minor Roberts & Stewart, 1976 .

Nanochromis wickleri appears to belong to the nudiceps ­group and shares several features with the other members of this group. For example, N. wickleri has an upper lateral line that is contiguous with the dorsal fin base for much of its length, cheek and nape squamation greatly reduced, and the absence of a supraneural bone; features that are interpreted as derived within the chromidotilapiine clade ( Greenwood 1987; pers. obs.). Furthermore, N. wickleri lacks a dark longitudinal band or series of midlateral blotches extending from the eye to the caudal peduncle (males) or end of the caudal fin (females), a coloration patterning that appears characteristic of members of the squamiceps group ( Lamboj 2004, Stiassny & Schliewen in prep.). Nonetheless, definitive placement of N. wickleri in the nudiceps ­group depends on the results of a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis (Schliewen et al. in prep) that includes representation of all described species as well as several currently undescribed species known from the Congo basin (pers. obs.). Pending this analysis a definitive placement of N. wickleri within the nudiceps ­group seems premature.

Figures

FIGURE 1. Nanochromis wickleri, holotype, ZSM 29695, male, 70.01 mm SL (91.3 mm TL);, Lake Mai Ndombe at Inongo, Democratic Republic of Congo (a) preserved (b) in life.

FIGURE 2. Nanochromis wickleri, paratypes, (a) ZSM 29696, female, 52.6mm SL, Lake Mai Ndombe at Inongo, Democratic Republic of Congo, (a) preserved (b) in life; (c) AMNH 236665, male, 50.2 mm SL (66.8 mm TL) in life (note produced fin­lappets of 2nd and 3rd dorsal spines).

FIGURE 3. Nanochromis wickleri, paratype, AMNH 236666, 44.7 mm SL, (a) isolated 1st gill arch, (b) oral jaws, suspensorium and operculum, (c) LPJ, and (d) infraorbital series.

FIGURE 4. Collecting sites of Nanochromis wickleri (star), Nanochromis transvestitus (square), and N. nudiceps (circle) in the area of Lake Mai Ndombe.