Ascaltis reticulum ( Schmidt, 1862 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2016.178 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3850393 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3406810E-DD20-B20A-FDB2-FAC9085A362C |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Ascaltis reticulum ( Schmidt, 1862 ) |
status |
|
Ascaltis reticulum ( Schmidt, 1862) View in CoL Fig. 2 View Fig ; Table 2 View Table 2
Nardoa reticulum Schmidt, 1862: 18 .
Tarrus reticulatus Haeckel, 1870: 244 .
Nardopsis reticulum Haeckel, 1870: 247 .
Ascandra reticulum Haeckel, 1872: 87 .
Olynthus reticulum Haeckel, 1872: 88 .
Clistolynthus reticulum Haeckel, 1872: 88 .
Soleniscus reticulum Haeckel, 1872: 88 .
Nardorus reticulum Haeckel, 1872: 88 .
Tarrus reticulum Haeckel, 1872: 88 .
Auloplegma reticulum Haeckel, 1872: 88 .
Ascometra reticulum Haeckel, 1872: 88 .
Ascandra retiformis Haeckel, 1872: 88 .
Ascandra reticulata Haeckel, 1872: 88 .
Clathrina reticulum Minchin, 1896: 359 .
Ascandra hermesi Breitfuss, 1897a: 39 .
Leucosolenia hermesi Dendy & Row, 1913: 722 .
Nardoa reticulum – Schmidt 1869: 91; 1870: 73.
Ascandra reticulum – Vosmaer 1881: 5. — Lendenfeld 1891: 39. — Breitfuss 1897b: 214; 1898a: 23; 1898b: 92. — Brøndsted 1914: 530. Leucosolenia reticulata – Dendy & Row 1913: 723. — Breitfuss 1932: 243.
Leucosolenia reticulum – Dendy & Row 1913: 723. — Breitfuss 1930: 275; 1932: 243; 1935: 14. — Topsent 1934: 9; 1936: 22. — Hôzawa 1940: 32. — Arndt 1941: 4. — Tanita 1942: 82; 1943: 386. — Burton 1963: 200.
Ascandra retiformis – Breitfuss 1932: 243.
Leucosolenia hermesi – Tanita 1942: 82.
Clathrina reticulum – Borojević 1967: 189. — Borojević & Peixinho 1976: 993. — Borojević & Boury- Esnault 1987: 12. — Klautau & Valentine 2003: 36. — Longo & Pronzato 2011: 230. — Muricy et al. 2011: 34.
Ascaltis reticulum View in CoL – Klautau et al. 2013: 452.
Original type locality
ADRIATIC SEA: Zara (Croatian: Zadar) and Sebenico (Croatian: Šibenik).
Type specimen
FRANCE: Banyuls-sur-Mer, Pyrenées, E.A. Minchin Collection ( BMNH 1896.9.15.13, neotype proposed by Klautau & Valentine 2003).
Material examined
ADRIATIC SEA: near the Island of Čiovo, 43°28'58.5" N, 16°21'25.6" E, 5 m, 5 Nov. 2010, collected by B. Pleše and V. Nikolić (PMR-13739 = UFRJPOR 6870).
Colour
White in life and white in ethanol.
Description
Cormus is composed of regular and tightly anastomosed tubes. Water-collecting tubes are present ( Fig. 2A View Fig ).As the specimen was fragmented, it was not possible to observe the pseudoatrium. The skeleton is composed of one category of triactines, one of tetractines and diactines. Diactines are organised in tufts of two to five spicules, perpendicularly disposed in the tubes ( Fig. 2B View Fig ). Triactines are the most abundant spicules.
Spicules ( Table 2 View Table 2 )
TRIACTINES. Regular (equiangular and equiradiate). Actines are slightly conical to cylindrical, with sharp tips ( Fig. 2C View Fig ). Size: 88.2/ 9.5 µm.
TETRACTINES. Regular (equiangular and equiradiate). Actines are slightly conical to cylindrical, with sharp tips ( Fig. 2D View Fig ). The apical actine is very thin and shorter than the basal ones. It is cylindrical and blunt, covered by abundant tiny spines ( Fig. 2E View Fig ). Size: 79.1/ 8.8 µm (basal actine); 41.9/ 3.2 µm (apical actine).
DIACTINES. Slightly curved. The tip that protrudes through the surface is lanceolated ( Fig. 2F View Fig ). Trichoxeas are also present on the surface of the tubes. Size: 106.3/ 4.9 µm.
Ecology
Specimens were collected on a vertical, shaded hard limestone bottom.
Remarks
Klautau et al. (2013) proposed to transfer this species to the genus Ascaltis based mainly on morphological, but also on molecular data. Although the type species of this genus ( A. lamarcki Haeckel, 1870 ) was not included in the molecular dataset, A. reticulum did not group with any of the included genera ( Fig. 16 View Fig ). Besides, morphologically it is more similar to Ascaltis than to any other genus. Therefore, although the classification of A. reticulum in the genus Ascaltis must still be verified regarding the type species of the
genus, it was morphologically and molecularly proved that it cannot be included in the genus Clathrina . Hence, we keep the proposition of Klautau et al. (2013) and name this species A. reticulum .
This is the first time that spines were observed on the apical actine of the tetractines of A. reticulum . For that reason, we examined the neotype of this species and detected spines as well. They are abundant and very small. We also observed a great variation in the size of the diactines, which are much larger in the neotype (102.0–212.2 (±54.1)–306.0 /14.3 (±5.1) µm).
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Calcinea |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ascaltis reticulum ( Schmidt, 1862 )
Klautau, Michelle, Imešek, Mirna, Azevedo, Fernanda, Pleše, Bruna, Nikolić, Vedran & Ćetković, Helena 2016 |
Nardoa reticulum
Nardoa reticulum Schmidt, 1862: 18 . |
Tarrus reticulatus
Tarrus reticulatus Haeckel, 1870: 244 . |
Nardopsis reticulum
Nardopsis reticulum Haeckel, 1870: 247 . |
Ascandra reticulum
Ascandra reticulum Haeckel, 1872: 87 . |
Olynthus reticulum
Olynthus reticulum Haeckel, 1872: 88 . |
Clistolynthus reticulum
Clistolynthus reticulum Haeckel, 1872: 88 . |
Soleniscus reticulum
Soleniscus reticulum Haeckel, 1872: 88 . |
Nardorus reticulum
Nardorus reticulum Haeckel, 1872: 88 . |
Tarrus reticulum
Tarrus reticulum Haeckel, 1872: 88 . |
Auloplegma reticulum
Auloplegma reticulum Haeckel, 1872: 88 . |
Ascometra reticulum
Ascometra reticulum Haeckel, 1872: 88 . |
Ascandra retiformis
Ascandra retiformis Haeckel, 1872: 88 . |
Ascandra reticulata
Ascandra reticulata Haeckel, 1872: 88 . |
Clathrina reticulum
Clathrina reticulum Minchin, 1896: 359 . |
Ascandra hermesi
Ascandra hermesi Breitfuss, 1897a: 39 . |
Leucosolenia hermesi
Leucosolenia hermesi Dendy & Row, 1913: 722 |
Nardoa reticulum
Schmidt 1869: 91 ; 1870: 73 |
Ascandra reticulum
Vosmaer 1881: 5 |
Lendenfeld 1891: 39 |
Breitfuss 1897b: 214 ; 1898a: 23 |
Brøndsted 1914: 530 |
Dendy & Row 1913: 723 |
Breitfuss 1932: 243 |
Leucosolenia reticulum
Dendy & Row 1913: 723 |
Breitfuss 1930: 275 ; 1932: 243 ; 1935: 14 |
Hôzawa 1940: 32 |
Arndt 1941: 4 |
Tanita 1942: 82 ; 1943: 386 |
Burton 1963: 200 |
Ascandra retiformis
Breitfuss 1932: 243 |
Leucosolenia hermesi
Tanita 1942: 82 |
Clathrina reticulum
Borojević 1967: 189 |
Borojević & Peixinho 1976: 993 |
Borojević & Boury- Esnault 1987: 12 |
Klautau & Valentine 2003: 36 |
Longo & Pronzato 2011: 230 |
Muricy et al. 2011: 34 |
Ascaltis reticulum
Klautau et al. 2013: 452 |