Scleronema Eigenmann, 1917

Ferrer, Juliano & Malabarba, Luiz R., 2020, Systematic revision of the Neotropical catfish genus Scleronema (Siluriformes: Trichomycteridae), with descriptions of six new species from Pampa grasslands, Neotropical Ichthyology (e 190081) 18 (2), pp. 1-81 : 5

Scleronema Eigenmann, 1917

Scleronema Eigenmann, 1917: 691 . —Eigenmann, 1918: 260, 269 (distribution notes); 277 (relationships); 278 (diagnosis in key); plate 36 (distribution map). —Tchernavin, 1944: 234, 235, 272 (review). —Myers, 1944: 597 (diagnosis in key). —Gosline, 1945: 55 (listed). —Fowler, 1954: 37 (listed). —Myers, Weitzman, 1966: 278, 284, 285 (phylogenetic relationships). —Ringuelet et al., 1967: 351 (diagnosis in key). —Baskin, 1973: 79, 98 (listed, notes on mouth width). —Castello et al., 1978: 124–125 (listed, diagnosis). —Burgess, 1989: 307, 313, 321 (listed, diagnosis in key). —Arratia, 1990: 400 (diagnosis). —de Pinna, 1989: 9, 24, 25, 28, 29; fig. 21, 30, 31, 35 (putative apomorphic characters, phylogenetic relationships, phylogenetic tree). —de Pinna, 1992: 213 (notes on dorsal-fin position). —Costa, Bockmann, 1993: 45 (phylogenetic relationships). — Arratia, Huaquin, 1995: 21; fig. 9b, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30 (notes on laterosensory canal system; drawing of the neurocranium and laterosensory canal system from dorsal view). —Eschmeyer, 1998: 2123 (listed). —Arratia, 1998: 366, 367; fig. 14e, 368 (phylogenetic relationships, drawing of the neurocranium and laterosensory canal system from dorsal view). —de Pinna, 1998: 299; fig. 10 (phylogenetic relationships, synapomorphies). —Nion et al., 2002: 15 (listed). —Wosiacki, 2002: 227, 324; fig. 87 (synapomorphies, phylogenetic relationships). —de Pinna, Wosiacki, 2003: 278 (listed). —Ferraris, 2007: 413 (listed). —Datovo, Bockmann, 2010: 233; fig. 37, 235–238 (phylogenetic tree, phylogenetic relationships). —Adriaens et al., 2010: 349, 357; fig. 10 (notes on length of the interopercular odontodes and body elongation). —DoNascimiento, 2015: 938, 941, 943, 944, 951 (notes on osteological characters). —Fernández et al., 2015: 6 (distribution in Argentina). —Nion et al., 2016: 15 (listed). —Ferrer, 2016: 61–62; figs. 47–50 (synapomorphies, phylogenetic relationships). —Ochoa et al., 2017a: 74–79 (phylogenetic relationships). —Katz et al., 2018: 560–564 (phylogenetic relationships). —Ochoa et al., 2020: fig. 3 (phylogenetic relationships).