Xiphocentron (Sphagocentron) evandrus Schmid, 1982
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/asp.82.e112587 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CB81B265-46A0-4247-A2F2-C9AC2394BC4E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11238203 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/30FDA621-E494-5E0E-858F-42BC4DCCC7A5 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Xiphocentron (Sphagocentron) evandrus Schmid, 1982 |
status |
|
Xiphocentron (Sphagocentron) evandrus Schmid, 1982 View in CoL
Figures 8 A – D View Figure 8
Schmid 1982: 56 [Type locality: Costa Rica, Juan Vinas, Chiz river; USNM; ♂]. — Holzenthal 1988 c: 58 [distribution]. — Armitage et al. 2015 a: 3 [distribution]. — Armitage et al. 2015 b: 5 [checklist]. — Armitage and Cornejo 2015: 193 [checklist]. — Harris and Armitage 2019: 7 [distribution]
Material examined.
COSTA RICA • ♂; Juan Vinas, Chiz river , 21. vi. 1967, Flint and Ortiz leg., USNM . • ♂; Alajuela, Río La Vieja, nr. Lagarto , 2-3. vii. 1967, Flint and Ortiz leg., USNM .
Diagnosis.
Xiphocentron evandrus can be differentiated by the combination of preanal appendage subapically wide, sternum IX posterior margin produced, overall deltoid, with shallow apical incision forming very small lobes; tergum IX with very deep, narrow, parallel sided mesal incision.
Synopsis.
Adult male. Forewing length 4-4.25 mm (n = 2). Color overall brown, forewing uniformly dark brown. Maxillary palp segment length formula (I = II = III) <IV <V. Tibial spur formula 2: 4: 3; spurs unmodified. Forewing forks I, II and IV present; fork I petiolated, fork II sessile at discoidal cell; discoidal cell half as long as thyridial cell (Fig. 8 A View Figure 8 ). Hind wing forks II and V present. Sternum V with anterolateral reticulated region.
Genitalia (Fig. 8 B – D View Figure 8 ). Tergum IX, in lateral view, wide basally, narrower apically (Fig. 8 B View Figure 8 ); in dorsal view posterior margin forming two dorsal lobes in quarter circle shaped and large lateral flanges (Fig. 8 C View Figure 8 ). Sternum IX, in lateral view, about 3 × as long as high, apex narrow, anterior apodeme short, truncate (Fig. 8 B View Figure 8 ); in ventral view, greatly enlarged at middle length, then greatly narrowed towards posterior margin, posterior margin with two very small lobes (Fig. 8 D View Figure 8 ). Paraproct, in lateral view, with apex oblique (Fig. 8 B View Figure 8 ); in dorsal view, apex round, ending in three equal lobes (Fig. 8 C View Figure 8 ). Preanal appendage, in lateral view, wide, strongly thickened subapically then tapering into long triangular pointed apex (Fig. 8 B View Figure 8 ). Inferior appendage, in lateral view, about 2 × as long as tergum IX, coxopodite and harpago completely fused to each article, inner face with longitudinal area of dense, long spine-like setae, and row of regular setae from midlenght to apex (Fig. 8 B View Figure 8 ); basal region (coxopodite) wide, mesal sclerite region indistinct (Fig. 8 B View Figure 8 ); apical region (harpago) narrow, digitate, 3 × as long as basal region, strongly curved (Fig. 8 B View Figure 8 ); in dorsal view, strongly sinuous (Fig. 8 C View Figure 8 ). Phallus tubular, very long and narrow, reaching segment V, basally conical, subapically annulate, weakly sclerotized, apex enlarged.
Distribution.
Costa Rica, Panama.
Remarks.
Type was fixed in a permanent slide and displayed in a dorso-lateral view.
USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |