Conopeum oretiensis Uttley, 1951
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2020.1771452 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4FED6730-1C70-4420-B1DA-F1D9046221DF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5020975 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2D0787B7-E53B-FFED-FEA1-FC9CEC92FD8A |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Conopeum oretiensis Uttley, 1951 |
status |
|
Conopeum oretiensis Uttley, 1951 View in CoL ( Figures 5 View Figure 5 , 6 View Figure 6 )
Conopeum oretiensis Uttley, 1951: 21 View in CoL , fig. 2; Gordon et al. 2009: 289.
Material examined
NIWA 92728 View Materials , NIWA Stn Z18615, 39.8622° S, 174.7040° E, 0 m, W of Waiinu Beach, Wanganui, 20 January 2014; NIWA 132862 View Materials , Stn Z18616, 41.2790° S, 173.2487° E, on beach-cast shell, Tahunanui Beach , Nelson, coll GoogleMaps . G GoogleMaps .H . Uttley, no date (late 1940s?); NIWA 132863 View Materials , Stn Z18617, 43.5035° S, 172.7305° E, on beach-cast shell, New Brighton, Christchurch , coll GoogleMaps . G GoogleMaps .H . Uttley, no date (late 1940s?); NIWA 132866 View Materials , Stn Z18620, 46.4379° S, 168.2302° E, on beach-cast shell, Oreti Beach , Southland, coll GoogleMaps . G GoogleMaps .H.Uttley, no date (late 1940s?). MITS 16147 , KPR363, 36.2978° S, 174.1872° E, 9 m, Kaipara Harbour, 28 September 2006; MITS 16171 , KPR1004, 36.4849° S, 174.3295° E, 18 m, Kaipara Harbour, 9 October 2006; MITS 16172 , KPR1006, 36.4961° S, 174,3233° E, 25 m, Kaipara Harbour, 9 October 2006; MITS 19665 , 1 MNK234 View Materials , 36.9411° S, 174,7076° E, no depth data, Manukau Harbour, 1 June 2006; MITS 19666 , 1 MNK567 View Materials , 37.0373° S, 174.7290° E, no depth data, Manukau Harbour, 1 June 2006; MITS 19671 , 1 MNK442 View Materials , 37.0401° S, 174.5732° E, no depth data, Manukau Harbour, 1 June 2006; MITS 19673 , 1 MNK566 View Materials , 37.0373° S, 174.7290° E, no depth data, Manukau Harbour, 1 June 2006; MITS 19674 , 1 MNK347 View Materials , 36.9645° S, 174.7191° E, no depth data, Manukau Harbour, 1 June 1006; MITS 19684 , 1 MNK419 View Materials , 37.0508° S, 174.6689° E, no depth data, Manukau Harbour, 1 June 2006; MITS 28186 , 1 MNK271 View Materials , 36.9571° S, 174.6658° E, no depth data, Manukau Harbour, 1 June 2006; MITS 28192 , 1 MNK288 View Materials , 36.9695° S, 174.6501° E, no depth data, Manukau Harbour, 1 June 2006; MITS 28195 , 1 MNK323 View Materials , 37.0056° S, 174.6522° E, no depth data, Manukau Harbour; 1 June 2006; MITS 28211 , 1 MNK420 View Materials , 37.0508° S, 174.6689° E, no depth data, Manukau Harbour, 1 June 2006; MITS 28224 , 1 MNK528 View Materials , 37.0367° S, 174.8278° E,no depth data,Manukau Harbour, 1 June 2006; MITS 30939 ,KPR451, 36.2600° S, 174.2525° E, 9 m, Kaipara Harbour , 28 September 2006 GoogleMaps .Also, SEM micrograph of specimen from Napier, no longer extant, coll . D GoogleMaps .P. Gordon 1970s.
Description
Colony encrusting, typically unilamellar but self-overgrowing when large, multiserial, up to ~ 65 mm maximum spread, whitish. By light microscopy, zooid walls are white, the membranous frontal wall transparent and the operculum very pale brown.
Mature autozooids in zone of astogenetic repetition arranged quincuncially, about twice as long as wide, suboval; each autozooid initially separated from neighbours by a narrow furrow.
Opesia elongate-oval, surrounded by narrowly sloping cryptocyst ( Figure 5 View Figure 5 (a,c)) that is of equal width throughout, its surface with conspicuous tubercular granules that may be much reduced or lacking on vertical thin distal margin. Gymnocyst conspicuous ( Figure 5 View Figure 5 (a)) in several autozooidal generations from the ancestrula, occupying a third or more of zooid length proximally and narrowing around steeply sloping margins; of more-variable length in zooids in the zone of astogenetic repetition, generally concealed by adventitious kenozooids of varying size in proximolateral corners and often along interzooidal margins. Periopesial spines 8–12 ( Figure 5 View Figure 5 (b)), the most distolateral pair and a midproximal spine typically stoutest, remaining spines mostly acicular, all leaning across opesia.
Fully formed kenozooids ( Figure 5 View Figure 5 (b–d)) with round to oval opesia at bottom of steeply sloping granular (initially smooth) cryptocyst with elevated rim; cystid gymnocystal, smooth, sometimes extended along interzooidal boundary.
Interzooidal communications via small oligoporous septula low on lateral walls.
Ancestrula subpyriform ( Figure 6 View Figure 6 (a, b)), with gymnocyst occupying more than onethird zooid length. Opesia near-circular, distal rim slightly extended distad. Very narrow cryptocystal rim unevenly granular. Opesial spines five, comprising a distolateral pair, a somewhat proximolateral pair, and a midproximal spine. Distal daughter zooid budded slightly obliquely in mid-distal position, with eight spines; slightly larger additional zooid later budded midproximally, also with eight spines. This pattern establishes an initially linear colony form, widening at each end into pluriserial then multiserial growth.
Measurements
Ancestrulate colony (MITS 28211) from Manukau Harbour, Auckland:
ZL 335–518 (424) [N = 20]; ZW 161–302 (240) [N = 20]; OpL 148–307 (258) [N = 20]; OpW 101–221 (169) [N = 20]; PCrL 15–44 (26) [N = 10]; KL 174–303 (227) [N = 10]; KW 82–136 (115) [N = 10]; AnL 262 [N = 1]; AnW 181 [N = 1]
Remarks
Conopeum oretiensis has not been formally reported from any new localities since its first discovery until now. Zooidal characters are very variable. For instance, when the articulated spines are limited to a conspicuous midproximal one and a smaller distolateral pair, the species can appear somewhat ‘electriform’ ( Figure 5 View Figure 5 (a)). With the development of additional spines and numerous adventitious kenozooids, the species more obviously conforms to Conopeum . Uttley (1951) noted that a fossil specimen of this species was also in the collection of the Canterbury Museum, in which case it would likely have been Pleistocene in age; no data were given as to its provenance in Napier.
One mollusc shell bore a colony from which some autozooids had flaked off, revealing deeply etched traces in the shell surface ( Figure 6 View Figure 6 (c)), representing the incipient ichnofossil Finichnus .
Distribution: Endemic – sporadically distributed at the present day from Kaipara Harbour to Foveaux Strait, 0–9 m, on hard substrata.
NIWA |
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Conopeum oretiensis Uttley, 1951
Gordon, Dennis P., Sutherland, Judy E., Perez, Brenda A., Waeschenbach, Andrea, Taylor, Paul D. & Di Martino, Emanuela 2020 |
Conopeum oretiensis
Gordon DP & Taylor PD & Bigey FP 2009: 289 |
Uttley GH 1951: 21 |