Apograpsus, Komai & Wada, 2008
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5340713 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1DBE528A-AF04-4F8B-93C5-F9025CC99A61 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B4A11E1E-C88C-4177-BBE7-408F53467C1D |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:B4A11E1E-C88C-4177-BBE7-408F53467C1D |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Apograpsus |
status |
gen. nov. |
Apograpsus View in CoL , new genus
Type species. – Ilyograpsus paantu Naruse & Kishino, 2006 View in CoL . Present designation by monotypy. Gender: masculine.
Diagnosis. – Carapace ( Figs. 17A, B View Fig ; 18A View Fig ) longer than wide; regions on dorsal surface well defined with gastric, cardiac, intestinal regions markedly elevated; cardiac region with 2 rounded prominences; intestinal region with low median ridge; lateral margin with 3 teeth including external orbital tooth, of which second tooth rudimentary; margin between external orbital tooth and third lateral tooth concave, thus carapace weakly constricted. Front broad, markedly bilobed, not constricted at base. Postfrontal ridges longitudinal, with few long setae anteriorly. Orbit large; upper orbital margin oblique; lower orbital margin ( Fig. 17C View Fig ) fairly oblique, smooth or faintly granular, mesial angle produced into prominent projection; inner orbital tooth small. Ocular peduncle ( Figs. 17A, B View Fig ; 18A View Fig ) slightly constricted; cornea large. Antennules ( Fig. 17B View Fig ) transverse or slightly oblique; basal segment inflated; inter-antennular septum narrow. Antennae ( Fig. 17B View Fig ) in orbital hiatus; flagellum relatively long. Central region of epistome strongly convex ( Fig. 17B View Fig ). Third maxilliped ( Fig. 17E View Fig ) similar to that of Ilyograpsus . Cheliped ( Figs. 16A, B View Fig ; 17G View Fig ; 18C, D View Fig ) small in male and female; merus ( Figs. 17F View Fig ; 18B View Fig ) narrowed distally, without subdistal spine on dorsal margin; carpus without prominent tooth or spine on inner surface; dactylus without differentiated teeth on cutting edges in male; fingers spoon-shaped at tips, not crossing when closed. Ambulatory legs ( Fig. 16A, B View Fig ) slender; meri ( Figs. 17I, J View Fig ; 18E, F View Fig ) each with sharp subdistal spine on anterior margin; propodi unarmed at posterodistal angles. Pleon generally similar to that of Ilyograpsus ; first somite with rounded lateral margin in male ( Fig. 17D View Fig ). First gonopod ( Fig. 17H View Fig ) stout, nearly straight in ventral view, slightly constricted at midlength; terminal process ( Fig. 17I View Fig ) very short, roundly truncate. Female gonopores close to suture between fifth and sixth sternite.
Remarks. – As already noted by Naruse & Kishino (2006), this species markedly differs from other species of Ilyograpsus in many characters. In particular, the carapace being longer than broad, the longitudinal postfrontal ridges with peculiar long setae anteriorly, the conspicuously projecting anteromesial angle of the lower orbital margin and the slightly constricted male first gonopod are unique for Apograpsus . In Ilyograpsus , the carapace is wider than long; the postfrontal ridges are transverse with procurved lateral parts; no setae is present at the anterolateral angle of the front; the anteromesial angle of the lower orbital margin is not markedly produced; and the first gonopod is not constricted at the middle. Furthermore, Apograpsus differs from Ilyograpsus in having three anterolateral teeth on the carapace, of which the second is rather obsolete. In Ilyograpsus , there are four anterolateral teeth. The meri of third and fourth pereopods in females (second and third ambulatory legs) are narrowed distally in Apograpsus , but in Ilyograpsus , the meri of these legs are not narrowed. The sister group of Apograpsus is still unclear, although the structure of the front and orbit of the carapace and the armature of the ambulatory meri link Apograpsus to Ilyograpsus , Enigmaplax and the hypothetical ancestor of Macrophthalmus (see Barnes, 1967). It is interesting to note that juveniles of Ilyograpsus species show some superficial resemblance to Apograpsus paantu , particularly in the carapace shape and the development of the anterolateral teeth (see Sawada et al., 2005, Fig. 4B View Fig ). This would seem to suggest a possibility that Apograpsus paantu was perhaps derived through a process of neoteny.
Etymology. – The name is derived from the Greek prefix “ Apo- ”, meaning remote, in arbitrary combination with the genus name “ Grapsus ”, in reference to the non-close relationship of the type species and closely related Ilyograpsus species to the Grapsidae or other related families.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.