Apograpsus, Komai & Wada, 2008
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5340713 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1DBE528A-AF04-4F8B-93C5-F9025CC99A61 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2C4E4F7B-4118-C117-FCE2-FC86CEEDFA1E |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Apograpsus |
status |
gen. nov. |
Key to species of Ilyograpsus View in CoL and Apograpsus , new genus
1. Carapace longer than broad, with 3 anterolateral teeth (including external orbital tooth) of which second tooth poorly developed; postfrontal ridges longitudinal, each with peculiar long setae anteriorly ................... Apograpsus paantu View in CoL , new combination
– Carapace wider than long, with 4 conspicuous anterolateral teeth (including external orbital tooth); postfrontal ridges transverse or L-shaped, without long setae ..................... 2 ( Ilyograpsus )
2. Regions of carapace poorly defined, lacking epigastric ridges or tubercles ............................................................................ 3
– Regions of carapace markedly defined, bearing epigastric ridges or tubercles ............................................................................ 4
3. Second and third anterolateral teeth moderately large, anterolateral margin generally convex; male first gonopod with elongate terminal process ................ Ilyograpsus rhizophorae
– Second and third anterolateral teeth small, anterolateral margin nearly parallel; male unknown ................................ I. vannini
4. Merus of cheliped with conspicuous subdistal spine; proportional length of dactylus of fourth pereopod (length of dactylus / length of propodus) included in range of 0.60–0.90; terminal process of male first gonopod somewhat elongate ............................ 5 Remarks. – Like species of Ilyograpsus , Apograpsus paantu shows notable sexual dimorphism in some characters. For example, the external orbital teeth are more strongly projecting in males than in females (cf. Figs. 17A View Fig and 18A View Fig ); the ocular peduncles is relatively larger in males than in females (cf. Figs. 17A View Fig and 18A View Fig ); the front is more distinctly bilobed in males than in females (cf. Figs. 17A View Fig and 18A View Fig ); the ambulatory legs are shorter in females than in males (cf. Fig. 16A and 16B View Fig ). On the other hand, the structure of the lower orbital margin is similar between males and females.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.