Placospongia ruetzleri van Soest, 2017

Sandes, Joana, Moraes, Fernando & Muricy, Guilherme, 2024, Taxonomy of Placospongia Gray, 1867 from Northern and Northeastern Brazil, with description of two new species (Porifera: Demospongiae: Clionaida), Zootaxa 5405 (4), pp. 495-525 : 509-513

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5405.4.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3080C791-0BF8-45E0-940E-CDC796EAAEFD

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10619631

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2C3EA33A-BE40-FF91-5FA9-6E85FBA28D18

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Placospongia ruetzleri van Soest, 2017
status

 

Placospongia ruetzleri van Soest, 2017 View in CoL

( Figs. 4 View FIGURE 4 and 7–9 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 ; Tables 2–3 View TABLE 2 View TABLE 3 , 5 View TABLE 5 and 7 View TABLE 7 )

Synonyms

Placospongia ruetzleri van Soest, 2017: 173 View in CoL ; Mácola & Menegola 2021: 12 View Cited Treatment ; Ugalde et al. 2021:30 View Cited Treatment ; Bettcher et al. 2023: 450 (in part).

Placospongia carinata sensu Little 1963: 56 View in CoL ; Coelho & Mello-Leitão 1978; Pulitzer-Finali 1986: 100 (non Geodia carinata Bowerbank, 1858 View in CoL ).

Placospongia intermedia sensu Muricy & Moraes 1998: 215 View in CoL ; Jimenez et al. (2004): 88 (non Placospongia intermedia Sollas, 1888 View in CoL ).

Placospongia sp. 1 sensu van Soest 2009: 11.

Material examined. UFRJPOR 561, off Amazon River mouth , Pará State, N Brazil (0º22’59.999”S, 47º16’0.998”W), 31 m depth, leg. Navio Oceanográfico Almirante Saldanha (N.O.A.S.), Station 1889, 26 April 1968 (= Placospongia carinata sensu Coelho & Mello-Leitão 1978 ) GoogleMaps ; UFRJPOR 4848, off Amazon River mouth , Pará State, N Brazil (0º25’0.003”S, 47º16’59.999”W), leg. Navio Oceanográfico Almirante Saldanha (N.O.A.S.), Station 1763, 28 November 1965 GoogleMaps ; MNRJ 3018 View Materials , Mamucabinha reefs, Tamandaré city, Pernambuco State, NE Brasil (8º47’15.015”S, 35º6’13.968”W), intertidal, coll. Guilherme Muricy, June 1997 (= Placospongia intermedia sensu Muricy & Moraes 1998 ) GoogleMaps ; MNRJ 6079 View Materials , Flexeiras beach, Trairi city, Ceará State, NE Brazil (3º12’48.168”S, 39º15’13.572”W), intertidal, 10 July 2002 (= Placospongia intermedia sensu Jimenez et al. 2004 ) GoogleMaps ; MNRJ 23227 View Materials , Baixa Funda reef, Pirangi do Sul beach, Nísia Floresta city, Rio Grande do Norte State, NE Brazil (5º56’38.74128”S, 35º06’58.57128”W), 10 m depth, colls. Guilherme Muricy & Joana Sandes, 06 March 2020 GoogleMaps ; MNRJ 29236 View Materials , Carnaubinha beach , Luis Correia city, Piauí State, NE Brazil (02º54’19.56”S, 41º34’35.26”W), intertidal, colls. Bruno Annunziata, Francisco Artur Silva Filho & Maura Rejane de A. Mendes, 8 September 2022 GoogleMaps ; MNRJ 29237 View Materials , Carnaubinha beach , Luis Correia city, Piauí State, NE Brazil (02º54’19.56”S, 41º34’35.26”W), intertidal, colls. Bruno Annunziata, Francisco Artur Silva Filho & Maura Rejane de A. Mendes, 10 September 2022 GoogleMaps .

Description ( Fig. 7a–d View FIGURE 7 ). Shape thick encrusting, with approximately 3.0–7.0 × 1.0–4.0 × 0.5–2.0 cm (lenght × width × thickness). The surface is smooth and divided into cortical plates of polygonal shape, separated by pore-bearing grooves and ridges. The consistency is hard. The external color in vivo is reddish-brown ( Fig. 7a View FIGURE 7 ) to purplish brown ( Fig. 7b View FIGURE 7 ). In ethanol, the external color is light ( Fig. 7c View FIGURE 7 ) to dark brown ( Fig. 7d View FIGURE 7 ), the internal color is cream and the grooves are light brown.

Skeleton ( Fig. 8a–c View FIGURE 8 ). The cortex is 730–1,020 µm thick, distinct from the choanosome ( Fig. 8a View FIGURE 8 ). The inner layer of the cortex is densely packed with selenasters and the outer layer is formed by scattered acanthomicrorhabds. Small tylostyles occur in the cortical region together with acanthomicrorhabds, through the aquiferous openings, which are devoid of selenasters ( Fig. 8b View FIGURE 8 ). The choanosomal skeleton is formed by tracts of tylostyle 200–310 µm thick, which run obliquely or perpendicularly from the substrate to the cortex ( Fig. 8a View FIGURE 8 ). The spirasters occur abundantly in the choanosome ( Fig. 8c View FIGURE 8 ), often lining the choanosomal openings. Mature selenasters, immature selenasters and acanthomicrorhabds are scattered in the choanosome among the bundles of tylostyles. At the base there is a dense layer of selenasters, 550–850 µm thick ( Fig. 8a View FIGURE 8 ).

Megascleres ( Fig. 9a–d View FIGURE 9 ; Tab. 5 View TABLE 5 ). Two categories of tylostyles. Tylostyles I are large, choanosomal, with blunt ends and rounded tyle: 490–888–1170 / 6–14–20 µm, tyle 10–17–24 µm width ( Fig. 9a–b View FIGURE 9 ). Tylostyles II are small, cortical, with sharp ends and rounded tyle: 140–324–570 / 2–8–15 µm, tyle 4–9–18 µm width ( Fig. 9c–d View FIGURE 9 ).

Microscleres ( Fig. 9e–i View FIGURE 9 ; Tab. 5 View TABLE 5 ). Mature selenasters are circular to oval, with fused spines forming rounded or polygonal plates: total size 32–69–88 / 20–54–73 µm, hilum 7–10 µm in diameter ( Fig. 9e View FIGURE 9 ). Three types of immature selenasters: type I are straight, slender, spiny, bearing spines concentrated at the ends of the shaft: 20–23–28 / 2–4–8 µm; type II are elongated, stout, with large and numerous spines: 25–28–35 / 12–14–15 µm ( Fig. 9f View FIGURE 9 ); type III are oval, stout, with spines very closely set, but still recognizable in their individuality: 40–45–50 / 25–32–40 µm. Immature selenasters types II and III are more abundant than type I. Spirasters ( Fig. 9g View FIGURE 9 ) are microspined, sometimes amphiaster-like ( Fig. 9h View FIGURE 9 ), with only one spiral turn and long rays disposed along the shaft or concentrated at both ends; some rays are branched into secondary spines near the extremity: 12–19–25 µm. Acanthomicrorhabds are small, stout, with rounded ends, occasionally with one or two turns: 5–9–15 µm ( Fig. 9i View FIGURE 9 ).

Habitat. This species was found on sandy bottom on the Guyana Shelf, at 25–34 m depth (van Soest 2017) and off the Amazon River mouth at 31 m depth ( Coelho & Mello-Leitão 1978, as P. carinata ). In Northeast Brazil, it is abundant in reef environments, occurring from the intertidal zone to 10 m depth, usually under boulders ( Muricy & Moraes 1998; Jimenez et al. (2004); Mácola & Menegola 2021; Bettcher et al. 2023; present study).

Geographical distribution ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ; Tab. 2 View TABLE 2 ). Gulf of Mexico ( Little 1963; Ugalde et al. 2021), Jamaica ( Pulitzer-Finali 1986), Suriname (van Soest 2017) and N-NE Brazil: Pará State ( Coelho & Mello-Leitão 1978 as P. carinata ; Muricy et al. 2011; present study), Piauí State (new record, present study), Ceará State ( Jimenez et al. 2004 as P. intermedia ), Rio Grande do Norte State (new record, present study), Pernambuco State ( Muricy & Moraes 1998 as P. intermedia ; Mácola & Menegola 2021), and Bahia State ( Mácola & Menegola 2021; Bettcher et al. 2023).

Taxonomic remarks. Placospongia ruetzleri from the Guyana Shelf and P. carinata from the Pacific Ocean share a similar spiculation, with two categories of tylostyles, rounded selenasters, spirasters/amphiasters, and acanthomicrorhabds (van Soest 2009, 2017; Becking 2013). However, P. ruetzleri is distinguished by the larger size of the tylostyles, the smaller size of the selenasteres, and the more spiraster-like shape of its microscleres, compared to amphiaster-like microscleres in P. carinata ( Tab. 3 View TABLE 3 ; van Soest 2009, 2017). These differences, along with the large geographic separation, support their distinction at the species level (van Soest 2017).

Placospongia ruetzleri View in CoL was recently described from Pernambuco and Bahia States, in Northeast Brazil ( Mácola & Menegola 2021; Bettcher et al. 2023). Most Brazilian records of P. carinata View in CoL ( Hechtel 1976; Coelho & Mello-Leitão 1978, Rua et al. 2006) were tentatively synonymyzed with P. ruetzleri View in CoL by van Soest (2017), with a question mark due to insufficient information. In contrast, David-Colón et al. (2023) suggested that these records could belong instead to Placospongia soesti David-Colón, Zea & Marín-Casa, 2023 View in CoL , also with a question mark. The record of P. ruetzleri View in CoL by Rua et al. (2006) was made in a conference abstract and is not taken in account here. We re-examined the specimen described from Pará State by Coelho & Mello-Leitão (1978) as P. carinata View in CoL (UFRJPOR 561), including SEM micrographs of the spicules. We concluded that it is indeed co-specific with P. ruetzleri View in CoL due their great similarity in general spicule size and shape, with presence of oval selenasters, spiraster-like microscleres and acanthomicrorhabds, and absence of spherasters ( Tabs. 3 View TABLE 3 , 5 View TABLE 5 and 7 View TABLE 7 ).

We also examined photographs in light microscopy of the spicules and skeleton of Hechtel’s (1976) specimen of P. carinata View in CoL from Pernambuco State (YPM 9021) ( Fig. 10a–d View FIGURE 10 ). It has two categories of tylostyles ( Fig. 10a–b View FIGURE 10 ), some of which are bifurcated, with oval to rounded tyles; oval to spherical mature selenasters ( Fig. 10a–c View FIGURE 10 ); rare oxyspherasters ( Fig. 10c View FIGURE 10 ); and possibly also micro-spheroxyasters or spherules ( Fig. 10d View FIGURE 10 ). Immature selenasters, spirasters, amphiasters and acanthomicrorhabds seem to be absent. We concluded that this specimen is not cospecific with either P. carinata View in CoL , P. ruetzleri View in CoL or P. soesti View in CoL , and that it probably belongs instead to a new species yet to be described. We refrain from doing so here due to the lack of SEM micrographs of the spicules, and therefore we propose to leave for now the Brazilian record of P. carinata View in CoL by Hechtel (1976) as Placospongia sp. , waiting for a full description ( Tab. 7 View TABLE 7 ).

On the other hand, we revised the specimens recorded by Muricy & Moraes (1998) and Jimenez et al. (2004) as P. intermedia (MNRJ 3018 and 6079, respectively), and concluded that they belong instead to P. ruetzleri due to the general spicule size, the presence of spirasters-like microscleres and acanthomicrorhabds, and the absence of metasters and spherasters, which are characteristic of P. intermedia ( Tabs. 3 View TABLE 3 , 5 View TABLE 5 and 7 View TABLE 7 ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Porifera

Class

Demospongiae

Order

Clionaida

Family

Placospongiidae

Genus

Placospongia

Loc

Placospongia ruetzleri van Soest, 2017

Sandes, Joana, Moraes, Fernando & Muricy, Guilherme 2024
2024
Loc

Placospongia ruetzleri van Soest, 2017: 173

Bettcher, L. & Fernandez, J. C. & Gastaldi, M. & Bispo, A. & Leal, C. V. & Leite, D. & Avelino-Alves, D. & Clerier, P. H. & Rezende, D. & Gulart, C. M. & Pinheiro, U. & Hajdu, E. 2023: 450
Macola, R. & Menegola, C. 2021: 12
Ugalde, D. & Fernandez, J. C. C. & Gomez, P. & Lobo-Hajdu, G. & Simoes, N. 2021: 30
Soest, R. W. M. van 2017: 173
2017
Loc

Placospongia sp. 1

Soest, R. W. M. van 2009: 11
2009
Loc

Placospongia intermedia sensu

Jimenez, P. C. & Teixeira, G. L. S. & Wilke, D. V. & Nogueira, N. A. P. & Hajdu, E. & Pessoa, C. & Moraes, M. O. & Costa-Lotufo, L. V 2004: 88
Muricy, G. & Moraes, F. C. 1998: 215
1998
Loc

Placospongia carinata sensu

Pulitzer-Finali, G. 1986: 100
Little, F. 1963: 56
1963
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF