Rhantaticus congestus ( Klug, 1833 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5380.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E9D5E0AF-9A3D-4C32-9C0A-6CCF5609D87E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10283881 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2C1D87FB-FF81-FFCE-F4A2-96D0FC2ECB55 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhantaticus congestus ( Klug, 1833 ) |
status |
|
Description of the instar II and III larvae of Rhantaticus congestus ( Klug, 1833) View in CoL ( Figs 1–23 View FIGURES 1–10 View FIGURES 11–14 View FIGURES 15-20 View FIGURES 21-23 )
Source of material. The larvae studied were associated with adults collected at the following localities: Madagascar: Toliara: RN10 15 km S. of junction RN7, Loc P44 , muddy zebu waterhole , 23.24257S 44.22927E, 17.v.2006, one instar III ( NHRS-JLKB 000076336), leg. J. Bergsten. GoogleMaps Madagascar: Toliara: Menabe: Kirindy RS. 20.07476S 44.67075E, 49 m.a.o. 12.xii.2009, MAD09-45, one instar II ( NHRS-JLKB 000000097, DNA voucher), leg. J. Bergsten, N. Jönsson, T. Ranarilalatiana, J.H. Randriamihaja GoogleMaps ; Madagascar: Toliara: Menabe: Kirindy RS. 20.07655S 44.67532E, 65 m.a.o. 12.xii.2009, MAD09-47, one instar III ( NHRS-JLKB 000000098), leg. J. Bergsten, N. Jönsson, T. Ranarilalatiana, J. H. Randriamihaja GoogleMaps ; Madagascar: Mahanjaga: Melaky: btw Bekopaka –Antsalova . 18.91556S 44.55546E, 47 m.a.o. 16.xii.2009, MAD09-61, two instar II ( NHRS-JLKB 000075156), leg. J. Bergsten, N. Jönsson, T. Ranarilalatiana, J. H. Randriamihaja GoogleMaps . Madagascar: Fianarantsoa: Plateau de l’Horombe , Nanarena vill. env; 22°30.1'S 45°45.6'E, 23.xi.2022, three instar II and nine instar III, leg. J. Hájek. GoogleMaps
Description, instar II ( Figs 1–14 View FIGURES 1–10 View FIGURES 11–14 , 21–22 View FIGURES 21-23 )
Color: Body predominantly creamy white to pale yellow; head capsule yellow, with a median piceous macula on frontoclypeus and parietal; head appendages creamy white to pale yellow; thoracic terga and legs pale yellow; abdominal terga yellow except abdominal tergum VIII black over posterior half; urogomphi black. It is worth noting, however, that two deviating larvae, both collected from a residual pool in a dried-out forest stream in a closed canopy deciduous forest, were darker in colouration. This could reflect that pigmentation is adaptable in R. congestus being darker in forest habitats and lighter in open landscape ones.
Body: Subcylindrical, bent at first abdominal segment, gibbous in lateral view. Measurements and ratios aimed to characterize the body shape as in Table 1 View TABLE 1 .
Head ( Figs 1–10 View FIGURES 1–10 ): Head capsule ( Figs 1–2 View FIGURES 1–10 ) flattened, subtriangular, longer than broad; maximum width at stemmata, not or slightly constricted at level of occipital region, HW/OCW = 2.29–2.39; occipital suture present, ecdysial line well marked; occipital foramen deeply emarginate both dorsally and ventrally; epicranial plates meeting ventrally, posterior tentorial pits visible ventrally on central region; surface smooth except for crescent-shaped microsculptures medially over occiput; frontoclypeus subtriangular, apical margin rounded medially; anterolateral lobes (= adnasalia) rounded, not projecting beyond nasale; six rounded dorsolateral stemmata at each side, stemmata protruding a short distance from head surface, two anterodorsal ones strongly developed. Antenna ( Figs 3–4 View FIGURES 1–10 ) short, robust, four-segmented, half as long as HW; A1 and A3 subequal in length, longest; A3 with a strongly developed ventroapical spinula; A4 shortest, with spinula at mid-length, similar to that of A3; apical lateroventral process of A3 (A3’) not protruding; antennomeres not covered with short spine-like spinulae. Mandible ( Figs 5– 6 View FIGURES 1–10 ) prominent, falciform, wide at base, sharp apically, with short-hair-like spinulae distally along inner margin; mandibular channel present, inner margin slightly toothed dorsally, more strongly ventrally. Maxilla ( Figs 7–8 View FIGURES 1–10 ) with cardo well developed; stipes strongly developed, subtrapezoidal, antero-internal angle right-angled, not projecting inwards, internal margin with short spinulae; palpifer very short, broad, incompletely sclerotized; palpus short, robust, three-segmented, MP1 shortest, MP3 longest, MP1/MP2 = 0.69–0.74; MP3 with spinula similar to those of antenna; palpomeres smooth, not covered with scattered minute spinulae; galea well developed, spiniform, slightly curved inwards, surface covered with scattered minute spinulae, GA/MP1 = 2.90–3.19. Labium ( Figs 9–10 View FIGURES 1–10 ) with prementum subtrapezoidal, somewhat pear-like, longer than broad, anterodorsal margin rounded, projecting forward into a unifid median process, not indented apically; dorsal surface of prementum densely covered with minute spine-like spinulae over apical and basal half; labial palpus short, robust, two-segmented, MP/LP = 0.66–0.69; palpomere 1 longest; palpomeres 1 and 2 with strong spine-like spinulae along external margin.
Thorax ( Figs 11–12 View FIGURES 11–14 ): Terga convex, pronotum about as long as meso- and metanotum combined, meso- and metanotum subequal; protergite subrectangular, margins truncated, more developed than meso- and metatergite; meso- and metatergite transverse, with anterotransverse carina; sagittal line well marked; venter membranous; spiracles absent. Legs ( Figs 11–12 View FIGURES 11–14 ): long, composed of six articles; L2 longest, slightly longer than subequal L1 and L3; CO robust, elongate, TR divided into two parts by an annulus, FE, TI and TA slender, subcylindrical, PT with two long, slender, almost straight claws, posterior claw shorter than anterior one; leg articles smooth, not covered with minute spine-like spinulae; ventral margin of protarsus with a row of well-developed spinulae along distal half; L3/HW = 2.89–3.05.
Abdomen ( Figs 13–14 View FIGURES 11–14 ): Eight-segmented, segments I–VI sclerotized dorsally, membranous ventrally; segments III–V widest, remaining segments progressively narrowing to apex; tergites I–VII similar to each other, narrow, transverse, laterally rounded, with anterotransverse carina, sagittal line present on anterior third; segments VII–VIII completely sclerotized; spiracles absent on segments I–VII; segment VIII (= LAS) ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 11–14 ) longest, subtriangular, without anterotransverse carina, not covered with short spinulae; siphon reduced. Urogomphus ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 11–14 ) short, onesegmented, not covered with short spinulae; U/HW = 0.38–0.45.
Chaetotaxy ( Figs 1–14 View FIGURES 1–10 View FIGURES 11–14 ): Dorsal surface of head capsule with few short secondary setae ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–10 ); ventral surface of parietal with several spiniform setae ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–10 ); antennomere I with several secondary setae dorsally (as in Fig. 17 View FIGURES 15-20 ); mandible with a row of elongate secondary hair-like setae along basoexternal margin ( Figs 5–6 View FIGURES 1–10 ); dorsal surface of maxillary stipes with two rows of elongate spine-like setae, 20–21 along inner margin and 6–8 medially; numerous secondary hair-like setae present along the dorsoexternal margin of stipes ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1–10 ); secondary leg setation detailed in Table 2 View TABLE 2 ; rows of secondary natatory setae present along posterodorsal margin and basal half of anteroventral margin of tarsi; posterior surface of femora and tibiae with linear row of minute secondary pores below the rows of natatory setae (not represented); abdominal segments VII–VIII with row of elongate natatory setae on lateral margin ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 11–14 ); LAS with secondary spine-like setae dorsally and ventrally ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 11–14 ).
Description, instar III ( Figs 15–20 View FIGURES 15-20 , 23 View FIGURES 21-23 )
As instar II except as follows:
Color: As in instar II ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 21-23 ).
Body: Measurements and ratios aimed to characterise the body shape as in Table 1 View TABLE 1 .
Head ( Figs 15–18 View FIGURES 15-20 ): Head capsule not constricted at level of occipital suture, HW/OCW = 1.83–1.97. Antenna: A2 and A3 secondarily subdivided ( Fig.17 View FIGURES 15-20 ). Maxilla: MP3 secondarily subdivided ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 15-20 ); MP1/MP2 = 0.90– 1.00; GA/MP1 = 2.36–2.54; MP/LP = 0.47–0.53.
Thorax ( Figs 19–20 View FIGURES 15-20 ): Spiracles present on mesothorax. Legs ( Figs 19–20 View FIGURES 15-20 ): L3/HW = 3.08–3.26.
Abdomen: Sagittal line and spiracles present on segments I–VII. Urogomphus: U/HW = 0.19–0.23.
Chaetotaxy ( Figs 15–20 View FIGURES 15-20 ): Parietal with several ventral secondary spine-like setae ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 15-20 ); mandible with a larger number of minute secondary setae distally; dorsal surface of maxillary stipes 22–24 inner and 8–11 median spine-like setae ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 15-20 ); secondary leg setation detailed in Table 2 View TABLE 2 and Figs 19–20 View FIGURES 15-20 .
Remarks: One instar II and two instar III larvae were CO1 sequenced along with two adults all collected in 2009. Latter two sequenced larvae were identical in 825bp of 3’ end of COI with each other and with one adult female whereas an adult male from MAD09-47 had 3 differences.
Habitat and collecting circumstances: Except for the two larvae from Kirindy RS collected from a residual pool in a dried-out forest stream in a closed canopy deciduous forest, all specimens studied were sampled in open landscape temporary pools and ponds such as the one represented in Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 (size ca. 1.5 x 1.0 m; maximal depth about 0.5 m; muddy bed, surrounded with short Cyperaceae plants).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |