Coptobrycon Géry, 1966
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/S1679-62252010000400004 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6493718 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2B6EF01C-FFDF-7557-FE9F-FB50FA906C88 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Coptobrycon Géry, 1966 |
status |
|
Coptobrycon Géry, 1966 View in CoL View at ENA
Figs. 1-7 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig
Coptobrycon Géry, 1966: 226 View in CoL (type-species: Hasemania bilineata Ellis, 1911 View in CoL , by original designation and monotypy).
Diagnosis. Coptobrycon is easily distinguished from all other Characidae due to: a very peculiar dentary dentition, with only three, large, anterior, multicuspid and pedunculated, principal teeth in each half of the dentary ( Fig. 5 View Fig ; vs. four or more conical or cuspidate and not pedunculated teeth, except in the Cheirodontinae and Iguanodectinae , which have more than four pedunculated teeth); the absence of the nasal bone (vs. present); the presence of a straight, dark brown stripe slightly above the base of the anal fin ( Fig. 1 View Fig ), from vertical through its origin or slightly behind, continuing through the ventral portion of the caudal peduncle up to the base of the caudal fin (vs. absent). Furthermore, it can also be separated from all other Characidae , except Grundulus , by having the nasal pores separated by a non confluent space ( Fig. 2 View Fig ; vs. nasal pores very close and confluent); infraorbitals 4 and 6 (5, sometimes) absent ( Fig. 4 View Fig ; vs. present); infraorbital laterosensory canal greatly reduced, with pores inconspicuous or absent ( Fig. 4 View Fig ; vs. present); supraorbital laterosensory canal absent in posterior portion of the frontal (vs. present). Other useful diagnostic characters include: up to six olfactory rosette lamellae, turned to the posterior portion of the nasal canal ( Fig. 3 View Fig ; vs. more than ten lamellae, generally more than fifteen, concentrically arranged; except in Grundulus and Xenurobrycon ); adipose fin absent ( Fig. 1 View Fig ; vs. present; except in Grundulus , Gymnocharacinus bergi , Hasemania , some Hyphessobrycon species , and Spintherobolus ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Coptobrycon Géry, 1966
Langeani, Francisco & Serra, Jane Piton 2010 |
Coptobrycon Géry, 1966: 226
Gery, J 1966: 226 |