Oecobius putus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1876
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2023.2272356 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10469544 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/297DCB74-EE30-C113-F488-11AEB9E5866F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Oecobius putus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1876 |
status |
|
Oecobius putus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1876 View in CoL
Oecobius putus View in CoL : Baum 1972: 125, figs 31, 32, 58–61, 64 (♂ ♀).
Oecobius putus View in CoL : Kullmann and Zimmermann 1976: 44, figs 4, 5, 10, 11 (♂ ♀).
For the full list of 18 taxonomic entries see WSC (2023).
Material
IRAN: Fars Province: 16♂ 27♀ ( ZMMU), Shiraz, 29.6°N, 52.516667°E, 18‒26 May 2000 (Y.M. Marusik); GoogleMaps Tehran Province: 2♂ 4♀ ( ZMMU), Iranian Research Institute Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, 35.783333°N, 51.4°E, 7‒22 June 2000 (Y.M. Marusik) GoogleMaps .
Records in Iran
Fars, Hormozgan, Khuzestan, Mazandaran, Tehran (Zamani 2016; Zamani et al. 2016; Zamani and Mozaffarian 2017; Boukan et al. 2018; Zamani and Bosselaers 2020; Hosseinpour et al. 2022; present material).
Distribution
South Africa, Egypt, Cyprus, Sudan to Iran, Azerbaijan, Afghanistan, India. Introduced in USA, Mexico ( WSC 2023). Synanthropic species.
ZMMU |
Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Oecobius putus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1876
Zamani, Alireza & Marusik, Yuri M. 2023 |
Oecobius putus
Kullmann E & Zimmermann W 1976: 44 |
Oecobius putus
Baum S 1972: 125 |