Wolbachia
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s13127-019-00418-y |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2713E522-9D49-7407-FF39-FC9EAC3CFBCA |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Wolbachia |
status |
|
Wolbachia View in CoL screening
The prevalence of Wolbachia was 98.6%. While all summer - type individuals proved to be infected, we could not detect Wolbachia in two spring - type specimens (see Suppl. Table S1). All infected samples harboured a single strain (allele No. 685). The PCR products from Wolbachia screening showed a systematic trend as only faint bands were observed in the spring - type specimens referring to the low abundance of the bacterium ( Fig. 5a View Fig ). On the contrary, strong bands were present in the analysed summer arion referring to high Wolbachia abundance. When we quantified this difference by the RT-Q-PCR method, we detected significantly smaller amounts of Wolbachia in the spring arion than in the summer type comparing the two forms to each other or carrying out pairwise comparisons by sampling sites ( Fig. 5b View Fig ). The summer type contained 29 times more Wolbachia than the spring form considering the median of the Wolbachia quantity in each type of P. arion .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.