Higginsarctus, Hansen & Kristensen, 2021

Hansen, Jesper G. & Kristensen, Reinhardt M., 2021, A new genus and five new species of the subfamily Florarctinae (Tardigrada, Arthrotardigrada), European Journal of Taxonomy 762 (1), pp. 149-184 : 152-154

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.762.1461

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:43F5C871-A651-47FB-B0A8-29C41EEEEBDD

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5213158

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B191A524-2C5F-4DBD-93BA-7DC1ADB82CC7

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:B191A524-2C5F-4DBD-93BA-7DC1ADB82CC7

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Higginsarctus
status

gen. nov.

Genus Higginsarctus View in CoL gen. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B191A524-2C5F-4DBD-93BA-7DC1ADB82CC7

Type species

Higginsarctus signeae View in CoL gen. et sp. nov.

Diagnosis

A genus of Florarctinae characterized by large, rigid and backwards bending primary clavae (shared with Ligiarctus ) supported by strong internal cuticular structures at their bases. Secondary clavae occurring as papillae (dome-shaped or spherical) or as flat sacs (round, rectangular or bilobed). Frontal ala, six lateral alae and a single caudal ala present. The proximal part of the alae (except for the frontal) internally supported by procuticle which sends out branching processes (ramuli) into the distal part of the alae. External claws with calcars and with small internal notches; internal claws with accessory spines and small internal notches.

Etymology

The new genus is dedicated to Dr Robert P. Higgins for his contributions to meiofauna research. Higgins +arctus (latinised Greek word), meaning Higgins’s bear.

Remarks

Higginsarctus gen. nov. shares with species of Florarctus , Ligiarctus and Wingstrandarctus the presence of alae, the shape of the cephalic cirri and fourth leg sense organ, the shape of the seminal receptacles, and the presence of internal hook-shaped peduncles. The very characteristic primary clavae, being large, rigid and backward bending, are shared only with Ligiarctus . It is very apparent that this new genus belongs to Florarctinae , perhaps being closest related to Ligiarctus . However, three characters of Higginsarctus gen. nov. set the genus apart from Florarctus , Ligiarctus and Wingstrandarctus , namely the number of lateral alae, the branching processes of procuticle reaching the distal part of the alae, and the presence of a small internal notch both on external and internal claws.

The term ‘caestus’(from Latin = ‘gauntlet’), originally suggested by Renaud-Mornant (1987), has been generally adopted as a term for the supporting procuticle of the alae in species of Florarctus ( Fontoura et al. 2017; Hansen & Kristensen 2020). While the procuticle of the alae in species of Florarctus generally forms proximal lobate processes, it is much different in species of Higginsarctus gen. nov. where the entire proximal half of the alae are supported by a procuticle which sends out branching processes into the distal part of the alae. It is therefore suggested to refer to this special configuration of the supporting structure in the alae of Higginsarctus gen. nov. as ‘ramuli’ (plural form of ‘ramulus’ (Latin) meaning ‘a small branch’).

The six species of Higginsarctus gen. nov. described below differ conspicuously in the morphology of the secondary clava. Further distinguishing characters include differences in alae morphology, genital features and ventral cuticular structures ( Table 1 View Table 1 ).

As in Florarctus and Wingstrandarctus , the distal margin of the lateral and caudal alae in species of Higginsarctus gen. nov. are characterised by small or larger indentations. Although being essential to an accurate description of alae morphology of each species, previous studies have not discriminated between types of indentations. Having studied numerous species of Florarctinae we believe that two morphological distinct types of indentations can be recognised, namely the ‘pointed’ type ( Fig. 1 View Fig ) and the ‘arched’ type ( Fig. 1 View Fig ). Consequently, the two types are discriminated in the species descriptions below. We also suggest considering both types in all future descriptions of species belonging to Florarctinae .

A new genital structure not observed previously in tardigrades is recognised in 4 out of 6 species. It is situated immediately posterior to the gonopore and will be referred to as the ‘genital stoup’ as it resembles the shape of the holy water holder ( Figs 2 View Fig , 4E View Fig ). Further investigation is needed to determine the exact function of this structure but it likely plays a role in either copulation or oviposition by facilitating the detention of spermatids/spermatozoa. The presence or absence of a genital stoup in Higginsarctus shintai gen. et sp. nov. and H. laurae gen. et sp. nov. cannot be determined with certainty in the present study. Thus, it might be confirmed as an apomorphy of the new genus, pending a closer study of new material.

A special kind of leaf-like structures are present on the ventral cuticle in the two species Higginsarctus signeae gen et sp. nov. ( Fig. 2 View Fig ) and H. laurae gen. et sp. nov. ( Figs 14 View Fig , 16C View Fig ). Such structures have not been discussed or named previously in Florarctinae although they are present in Florarctus heimi Delamare-Deboutteville & Renaud-Mornant, 1965 (see Gąsiorek et al. 2021: fig. 6), and will tentatively be referred to as ‘folia’ (plural form of ‘folium’ (Latin), meaning a thin leaf-like structure or lamella, a leaf, especially a thin leaf or plate (geometry)).

Table 1. Differential table of major morphological characters in species of Higginsarctus gen. nov.

  H. signeae gen. et sp. nov. H. shintai gen. et sp. nov. H. lassei gen. et sp. nov. H. martini gen. et sp. nov. H. laurae gen. et sp. nov. H. alatus gen. et comb. nov.
Secondary clava Flat, rectangular with sligthly protruding contours Flat, comma- shaped Flat, oval Ovoid, dome- shaped Spherical Flat, bilobed
Antero-lateral ala Unilobed without indentation Unilobed without indentation Unilobed without indentation Bilobed with medial pointed indentation Trilobed with pair of medial pointed indentations Unilobed without indentation
Medio-lateral ala Unilobed without indentation Unilobed without indentation Bilobed with medial pointed indentation Bilobed with medial pointed indentation Bilobed with medial pointed indentation Unilobed without indentation
Postero-lateral ala Bilobed, rectangular with medial arched indentation Bilobed with medial pointed indentation Bilobed with medial arched indentation Trilobed with anterior pointed indentation and posterior arched indentation Bilobed with medial pointed indentation Bilobed with medial arched indentation
Caudal ala Quadrilobed, rectangular with 3 arched indentations Quadrilobed, rectangular with 3 arched indentations Quadrilobed, rectangular with 3 arched indentations Quadrilobed, round with 3 arched indentations Bilobed, round with medial pointed indentation Bilobed, rectangular with medial arched indentation
Leg sensory organs I–III Similar in length Similar in length Similar in length Similar in length Similar in length Highly different in length
Genital stoup Present Present Present Present
Genital papilla Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Present
Folia Present Absent Absent Absent Present Absent
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF