Stephanopis rufiventris Bradley, 1871
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3853/j.2201-4349.71.2019.1698 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7EDBAB7F-0E3B-47D7-AA29-0906728ADA05 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/26714D71-FF81-FFC7-07B8-FA07FC4FF8D0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Stephanopis rufiventris Bradley, 1871 |
status |
|
Stephanopis rufiventris Bradley, 1871 View in CoL
Fig. 41 View Figure 41
Stephanopis rufiventris Bradley, 1871: 237 View in CoL .
Type material examined. Holotype ♀, OUMNH 618 , Tia (40 km east of Walcha), New South Wales, [31°12'S 151°48'E], Australia. GoogleMaps
Other material examined. Queensland: AMS KS.53360, 1♀, Kenilworth State Forest , 26°42'21"S 152°31'41"E, G. Milledge, 7 May 1998 GoogleMaps . New South Wales: AMS KS.108723, 1♀, Vittoria ( Bathrust ), 33°27'S 149°20'E, C. Chadwick, 1 October 1967 GoogleMaps ; AMS KS.73311, 1♀, Maroota State Forest , 33°31'S 150°59'E, G.A. Webb, 2 November 1979 GoogleMaps . Victoria: AMS KS.108722, 4♀♀, Eltham , 37°43'S 145°09'E, C. Chadwick GoogleMaps & R. E. Mascord , 2 January 1968 .
Diagnosis. Females of S. rufiventris resemble those of S. cambridgei in having an elongated body, predominantly orange colouration, striped legs ( Fig. 41A View Figure 41 ) and external genitalia with shallow atrium and copulatory ducts hidden by the lateral folds of the epigynal plate ( Fig. 41C View Figure 41 ). However, S. rufiventris can be distinguished by its more flattened prosoma ( Fig. 41B View Figure 41 ) with shorter dark stripes, restricted to the median portion and sides of the cephalic area instead of long longitudinal marks extended until the PLE. Their epigynal plate is thicker, with sclerotized folds that are joined anteriorly forming a horse-shoe-shaped structure ( Fig. 41C View Figure 41 ) instead of the pair of lateral pockets observed in females of S. cambridgei . The spermathecae are characteristically positioned on the sides and bear glandularheads on their top; the anterior chambers are rounded and medially positioned ( Fig. 41D View Figure 41 ).
Description. Female (AMS KS.108722): Anterior eye row recurved and posterior straight, prosoma flattened, predominantly orange with two pairs of longitudinal cephalic stripes (one on the median area and one on the sides) ( Fig. 41A and B View Figure 41 ); cephalic prominence absent. Legs orange with darker distal markings on the femora and metatarsi and proximal ones on tibiae. Opisthosoma obovate, slightly concave on its anterior border, presenting a median reentrance close to the anal region and three pairs of well-developed dark-brown muscular sigilla on the dorsum ( Fig. 41A View Figure 41 ).
Measurements: eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.08, ALE 0.15, PME 0.13, PLE 0.13, AME–AME 0.12, AME–ALE 0.07, PME–PME 0.14, PME–PLE 0.17, MOQ length 0.36, width 0.32; leg formula: 1-2-4-3: leg I—femur 2.33/ patella 1.06/ tibia 2.19/ metatarsus 1.11/ tarsus 0.90/ total 7.59; II—2.30/ 1.02/ 2.12/ 1.09/ 0.90 7.43; III—1.56/ 0.90/ 1.49/ 1.05/ 0.88/ 5.88; IV—2.17/ 1.00/ 1.70/ 1.04/ 0.90/ 6.81. Total body length 8.39; prosoma length 3.71, width 3.46; opisthosoma length 4.68; clypeus height 0.28; sternum length 1.61, width 1.48; gnathocoxae length 0.72, width 0.33; labium length 0.50, width 0.52.
Male: Unknown.
Distribution. Queensland, New South Wales and Victoria, Australia ( Fig. 42 View Figure 42 ).
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Stephanopis rufiventris Bradley, 1871
Machado, Miguel, Teixeira, Renato Augusto & Milledge, Graham A. 2019 |
Stephanopis rufiventris
Bradley, H. B. 1871: 237 |