Kemponia, Bruce, A. J., 2004
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.157391 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3509407 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/234E87ED-AD0D-FFBD-F54A-FB41FAE7FB56 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Kemponia |
status |
gen. nov. |
Key to the species of Kemponia gen. nov.
1. Merus of second pereiopod with distoventral tooth ...................................................... 2
Merus of second pereiopod unarmed .......................................................................... 15
2. Supraorbital spines present............................................................................................ 3
Supraorbital spines absent........................................................................................... 11
3. Distal tooth of scaphocerite distinctly exceeding lamella ............................................. 4
Distal tooth of scaphocerite not, or scarcely, exceeding lamella; R. 1+68/13.............. ........................................................................................................... K. demani (Kemp)
4. Rostrum shallow, ambulatory pereiopods long and slender, fifth exceeding scaphocerite ....................................................................................................................................... 5
Rostrum moderately deep, ambulatory pereiopods relatively stout, fifth not exceeding scaphocerite.................................................................................................................8
5. Carpus of second pereiopod with conspicuous tooth on inner side .............................. 6
Carpus of second pereiopod without conspicuous tooth on inner margin .................... 7
6. Carpus of male second pereiopod subequal to or shorter than merus, carpus with dis tomedial tooth; R. 1+68/24................................................ K. andamanensis (Kemp)
Carpus of male second pereiopod conspicuously longer than merus, carpus without distomedial tooth; R. 1+56/2 ........................................ K. suvadivensis (Borradaile)
7. Carpus of first pereiopod at least 1.75 times chela length; male second pereiopod with chela not more than 1.25 of carpal length; in females subequal to chela or slightly shorter; R.1+68/23............................................................................ K. agag (Kemp)
First pereiopod carpus less than 1.5 of chela length; chela of second pereiopod more than 1.3 times carpus length in both sexes; R. 1+56/23. K. longirostris (Borradaile)
8. Distal margin of second pereiopod carpus with 1–2 acute teeth ................................... 9
Distal margin of second pereiopod carpus without acute teeth; R. 78/3........................ ...................................................................................................... K. ensifrons (Dana) View in CoL
9. Carpus of second pereiopod with two acute distal teeth ............................................. 10
Carpus of second pereiopod with single distomedial tooth only; R. 1+59/25.............. .................................................................................................... K. grandis (Stimpson) View in CoL
10. Ambulatory pereiopods with propods strongly spinulate; chela of second pereiopod (male only?) finely tuberculate; R. 1+57/23.............................. K. elegans (Paulson) View in CoL
Ambulatory pereiopods with propods with small distoventral spine only; chelae of second pereiopods not tuberculate; R. 1+ 67/3...................... K. amymone ( De Man)
11. Rostrum greatly exceeding scaphocerite..................................................................... 12
Rostrum subequal to scaphocerite............................................................................... 13
12. Second pereiopods with ischium distoventrally unarmed, rostrum sinuous, upcurved, ambulator y propods segmented, nonspinulate; R. 1811 /69 ........................................ ............................................................................................... K. tenuipes (Borradaile)
Second pereiopods with strong distoventral ischial tooth, rostrum straight, horizontal, ambulatory propods not segmented, spinulate; R.1+10/6 .............. K. lacertae (Bruce)
13. Second to fourth dorsal rostral teeth enlarged and grouped over orbital region; ambula tory propods with distoventral spines only; R. 1+67/34......... K. kororensis (Bruce)
Dorsal rostral teeth evenly distributed, similar ........................................................... 14
14. Inferior orbital angle rounded; second pereiopod carpus with two strong distal teeth, dactylus with proximal lateral flange; R. 1+6/56 ................ K. platycheles (Holthuis)
Inferior orbital angle acute; second pereiopod carpus without strong teeth; dactylus without lateral flange; R. 1+67/2 .......................................... K. darwiniensis (Bruce)
15. Supraorbital spines present.......................................................................................... 16
Supraorbital spines lacking ......................................................................................... 19
16. Second pereiopod carpus much longer than palm; R. 1+69/23.................................... ................................................................................................ K. anacanthus (Bruce)
Second pereiopod carpus not longer than palm .......................................................... 17
17. Inferior orbital angle obsolete; R. 1+5/3 ...................................... K. paulsoni (Bruce)
Inferior orbital angle distinct....................................................................................... 18
18. Rostral lamina slender; second pereiopod carpus distinctly shorter than merus; R. 1+7 8/34 ................................................................................ K. nilandensis (Borradaile)
Rostral lamina deep; second pereiopod carpus subequal to merus; R. 1+7/3 ................ ................................................................................................ K. edwardsii (Paulson)
19. Robustly built species, with two teeth situated on carapace posterior orbital margin 20
Slenderly built species, with one tooth situated on carapace posterior to orbital margin ..................................................................................................................................... 21
20. Eyestalk with conspicuous dorsal tubercle; carpus of second pereiopod distinctly shorter than chela; R. 2+68/25.................................... K. seychellensis (Borradaile)
Eyestalks without dorsal tubercles, carpus of second pereiopod about 0.8 of chela length; ambulatory dactyl about 0.25 of propod length; R. 2+5/3 .................................. .................................................................................................. K. ungujaensis (Bruce) View in CoL
21. Two postorbital teeth present, first tooth epigastric; carpus and fingers of second pereiopod subequal to palm; ambulatory dactyl about 0.35 of propod length; R. 2+67/ 3–4 ................................................................................................ K. akiensis ( Kubo) View in CoL
One postorbital tooth only........................................................................................... 23
22. Postorbital tooth epigastric; distolateral angle of basal antennular segment multidentate; second pereiopods weakly developed, chelae about 0.6 of carapace length, fingers without diastemal notches; R. 1+ 98/45............................. K. johnsoni (Bruce)
Postorbital tooth not epigastric; distolateral angle of basal antennular segment with distolateral tooth only; second pereiopods well developed, chelae about 0.9–1.1 of carapace length, fingers with distinct diastemal notches ................................................. 22
23. Second pereiopod carpus about 0.5 of palm length; ambulatory dactyl about 0.5 of propod length; R. 1+69/23 .............................................. K. americanus (Kingsley)
Second pereiopod carpus subequal or longer than palm length; ambulatory dactyl about 0.35 of propod length; R. 1+78/45 ............................ K. calmani (Tattersall)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |