Clathrina insularis Azevedo, Padua, Moraes, Rossi, Muricy & Klautau, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4410.2.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:03410832-3508-4DE7-A4CF-D0D458E0069A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5966589 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/225F2A0C-FFB2-FFDF-0BFD-2B1396DBB3A0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Clathrina insularis Azevedo, Padua, Moraes, Rossi, Muricy & Klautau, 2017 |
status |
|
Clathrina insularis Azevedo, Padua, Moraes, Rossi, Muricy & Klautau, 2017 View in CoL
( Figure 8 View FIGURE 8 , Table 8)
Synonyms. Clathrina sp. nov. 1: Pérez et al. 2017: 13. Clathrina insularis: Azevedo et al. 2017: 307 , Cóndor-Luján et al. 2018: 19.
Material Examined. ( One specimen) UFRJPOR 7428, Pointe Burgos, Anses d'Arlet, Martinique (14°29.787' N – 61°5.351' W), collected by M. Klautau and T. Pérez, 0 6 December 2013. GoogleMaps
Colour. Yellow alive and brown in ethanol.
Description. Cormus composed of irregular and loosely anastomosed tubes ( Figure 8A View FIGURE 8 ). Surface smooth and texture soft. Water-collecting tubes are not present. No cells with granules were found. Aquiferous system asconoid.
Skeleton. The skeleton is disorganised ( Figure 8B View FIGURE 8 ) and composed of two categories of triactines. Spicules ( Table 8).
*From Azevedo et al. (2017).
Triactines I: Regular. Actines are conical with sharp tips ( Figures 8D–E View FIGURE 8 ). They are very rare. They are the smallest triactines of this species. Size: 35.0–82.5/6.2–7.5 µm.
Triactines II: Regular or subregular. Actines are cylindrical to slightly conical, distally undulated and with sharp tips ( Figures 8C–F View FIGURE 8 ). They are the most abundant spicules. Size: 100.0–120.0/7.5–10.0 µm.
Ecology. The specimen was collected in a crevice, protected from sunlight.
Remarks. Azevedo et al. (2017) commented that the yellow clathrinas that most resemble morphologically C. insularis are C. luteoculcitella Wörheide & Hooper, 1999 and C. chrysea Borojevic & Klautau, 2000 , as they have sharp actines. However, they can be differentiated by the anastomosis of the cormus, which is tight in C. luteoculcitella and C. chrysea , and loose in C. insularis .
Comparing the specimen from Martinique with the holotype from Brazil, we found a small variation in the size of the spicules, with the individuals from Martinique having slightly smaller spicules ( Table 8). In our phylogenetic tree the specimens from Martinique grouped with those from Brazil and Curaçao with 100% bootstrap and the pdistance varied from 0% to 0.5% ( Figure 15 View FIGURE 15 ).
Geographical distribution. Fernando de Noronha Archipelago , off NE Brazil ( Azevedo et al. 2017) , Curaçao ( Cóndor-Luján et al. 2018), and Martinique.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |