Leucocelis (Leucocelis) claveaui otavi, Perissinotto, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.13133/2284-4880/1548 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12763151 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1F675E35-FFAB-FFBF-6E41-66A7FC79F45E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Leucocelis (Leucocelis) claveaui otavi |
status |
sp. et subsp. nov. |
Leucocelis (Leucocelis) claveaui otavi sp. et subsp. nov.
( Figs 3-5 View Fig View Fig View Fig , 7 View Fig )
Diagnosis. Leucocelis (L.) c. otavi differs from the nominal subspecies mainly in having a much more extensive white maculation on its dorsal surface, which includes two marked central longitudinal lines of round spots and two symmetric large lateral maculae on the pronotum, as well as a few extra maculae on the lateral declivity of its elytron ( Figs 3 A, C View Fig and 5 View Fig ), by comparison with a typical L. (L.) c. claveaui . Also, its elytral background colour is light bluish-green, rather than dark navy-blue like in L. (L.) c. claveaui . Furthermore, the pygidium of L. (L.) c. otavi is completely black ( Fig. 3 E View Fig ) and not brownish-orange like in the nominal subspecies, and the apical tubercle of the ventral lobes of its parameres are notably more rounded than those of L. (L.) c. claveaui ( Fig. 3 F, G View Fig ).
In terms of allied species, L. (L.) c. otavi superficially resembles more L. (L.) adspersa s. s., rather than L. (L.) franki . It can be separated from L. (L.) adspersa s. s. by exhibiting a blue-green elytral background colour, while in the latter species this is generally bright green to ferrugineous-green. Its pygidium is entirely black and lacks any sign of white markings ( Fig. 3 E View Fig ), while in L. (L.) adspersa s. s. this is dark coppery to brown with 1-2 pairs of white spots of variable size. The interstrial elytral sculpture of L. (L.) c. otavi is predominantly of horse-shoe type, extremely well-developed and large ( Fig. 3 A View Fig ), while in L. (L.) adspersa s. s. it is a combination of small and shallow horse-shoe punctures and geminate striae. The white spots are rounder in shape and larger in L. (L.) c. otavi than in L. (L.) adspersa s. s., particularly on the pronotal disc and on the apical and postero-lateral declivities Remarks. The size of the holotype male is 11.9 mm in total length and 5.8 mm in maximum width. The female is yet unknown, but is expected to exhibit the same key characters of the female of the nominal subspecies.
Adult activity most probably peaks during the mid-summer months as the date of observation of the type specimen indicates. It is not known whether this subspecies is also floricolous like the nominal one, as the only specimen currently known was found resting on foliage and not feeding on flowers. Larvae and other early life stages are yet unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.