Porcellanola sukhothai László, Ronkay & Witt, 2006
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4810.1.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9D066BC0-075D-41FD-A9D3-2C59F6979E45 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4328324 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1F1287CC-FF9A-FFEA-FF75-FD694DDE8DCA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Porcellanola sukhothai László, Ronkay & Witt, 2006 |
status |
|
Porcellanola sukhothai László, Ronkay & Witt, 2006 View in CoL
( Figs 4, 5 View FIGURES 1– 6 , 14, 15, 18 View FIGURES 14–18 )
Porcellanola sukhothai László, Ronkay & Witt, 2006 View in CoL ; Entomofauna, 27 (21): 273.
Material examined. India, East Sikkim, Rumtek , N27°18.297’, E088°34.194’, 1293 m, 08.x.2019, 6 males; East Sikkim, Rumtek, N27°18.297’, E088°34.194’, 1293 m, 09.x.2019, 01 female; East Sikkim, Rumtek, N27°18.297’, E088°34.194’, 1293 m, 10.x.2019, 7 males, leg. N. Kuni, (Slide: Nol.—5 (RJ) and 5a (RJ)), coll. NZCZSI/ GPRC GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. Forewing length: 7mm. P. sukhothai is closely related to P. thai László, Ronkay & Witt, 2006 both described from North Thailand. In the original description, the authors claim P. sukhothai having less sharply defined and finer crosslines and considerably paler outer third of forewings than those of P. thai . The newly collected fresh specimens from Sikkim however, display almost identical forewing pattern compared to that of P. thai . The reason of this discrepancy might be that the type specimens of P. sukhothai serving as basis of description of the taxon were rather worn, with their darker hair scales partly rubbed off. Having P. thai compared with the fresh specimens of P. sukhothai from Sikkim, the only significant external difference between the two species is expressed by the shape and colour of the medio-costal patch of forewing: that is rather quadrangular and filled by pale brown hair-scales in P. sukhothai , whereas it is elongate-trigonal filled by creamy white hair-scales in P. thai . P. sukhothai is undoubtedly characterized by its male genitalia by having a single, slightly curved harpe and simple quadrangular shield-like fultura inferior (juxta), whereas the harpe of P. thai is bifid with two well developed claw-like processes, in addition the fultura inferior (juxta) of P. thai is widely incised medio-dorsally with a conspicuous, acute ventromedial process.
During the recent sampling carried out in Sikkim, female specimens of P. sukhothai have been collected for the first time. The external habitus of the female of P. sukhothai is similar to that of the males, displaying no significant sexual dimorphism, except in the configuration of antennae which are densely ciliate in males, while those of females are filiform with sparse, short ciliation.
Description of the female genitalia ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 14–18 ). Ovipositor short, papillae anales narrow, elongate, conical; apophyses posteriors medium-long. Eighth tergite very short; eight sternite relatively large, heavily sclerotized; apophyses anteriores very short, thorn-like. Ostium bursae broad, medium-long, infundibular, heavily sclerotized. Ductus bursae medium-long, membranous; cervix bursae broad, sack-like. Corpus bursae medium large, posteriorly tubular, anteriorly broad-ovoid; Signum bursae absent.
The configuration of the female genitalia of P. sukhothai supports the species close relationship to P. thai with the following distinctive features: P. sukhothai has slightly longer apophyses posterior and anterior, considerably longer ductus bursae, more elongated tubular posterior part and somewhat smaller, less elongate anterior part of corpus bursae compared to those of P. thai , in addition P. sukhothai lacks Signum bursae, whereas the related species has a pair of finely scobinate elongate plates on corpus bursae.
Distribution. India (Sikkim), Thailand.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Porcellanola sukhothai László, Ronkay & Witt, 2006
Joshi, Rahul, Singh, Navneet, László, Gyula M. & Kuni, Nikhil 2020 |
Porcellanola sukhothai László, Ronkay & Witt, 2006
Laszlo, Ronkay & Witt 2006 |