Dussartiellidae, Lowry & Myers, 2012
publication ID |
CEEE477A-5F39-417F-8DFA-09102398734A |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CEEE477A-5F39-417F-8DFA-09102398734A |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1D1FDA24-FFF1-FFD9-FF12-F13AA2CFA4A8 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2021-08-24 13:50:54, last updated by Plazi 2023-11-04 16:36:01) |
scientific name |
Dussartiellidae |
status |
fam. nov. |
Dussartiellidae View in CoL fam. nov.
Type genus. Dussartiella Ruffo, 1979 View in CoL . Included genera. Dussartiella Ruffo, 1979 View in CoL ; Reinhardia Iannilli, Krapp & Ruffo, 2011 View in CoL .
Diagnostic description. Head eyes absent. Calceoli absent. Antenna 1 longer than antenna 2; peduncular article 1 longer than article 2; accessory flagellum minute. Antenna 2 peduncular article 1 bulbous. Mandible incisor dentate. Labium without inner plates. Maxilla 1 inner plate setose apically; palps dissimilar, left vestigial, right slender with apical slender setae. Maxilla 2 inner plate without oblique setal row. Maxilliped inner plate well developed; outer plate small. Body subcylindrical. Coxal gills present on coxae 2 to 7, stalked, with proximal suture. Sternal gills absent. Gnathopod 1 similar in size and form to gnathopod 2; propodus without robust setae along palmar margin. Pereopod 4 without posteroventral lobe. Pereopods 5–7: progressively longer; basis linear; dactyli with a few subterminal setae. Pereopod 5 coxa with small anteroventral lobe. Urosomites 1 to 3 free, without robust dorsal setae. Urosomite 1 without distoventral robust seta. Urosomite 2 without paired dorsal setae. Uropod 1 peduncle without basofacial robust setae; without ventromedial spine. Uropod 3 biramous; rami not sexually dimorphic; without fringing plumose setae; inner ramus minute; 2- articulate, outer ramus article 2 short. Telson entire, with robust setae.
Remarks. Bousfield (1982, 1983) included Paracrangonyx , Dussartiella and Pseudingolfiella in the Paracrangonyctidae . The cladistic analysis of Koenemann & Holsinger (1999) indicated little affinity between these genera. Fenwick (2001) accepted the monotypy of the Paracrangonyctidae .
Dussartiellids may be most similar to austroniphargids and paramelitids. They differ from austroniphargids in having non-coalesced urosomites and apparently no distoventral robust seta on urosomite 1. They differ from paramelitids in having: no calceoli; a 2-articulate mandibular palp; an asymmetrical maxilla 1 palp; and in having coxal gills on pereonites 2–7. Dussartiellids are also similar to bogidiellids, but bogidiellids differ significantly from dussartiellids in the following characters: antenna 2 peduncular article 1 not swollen (swollen in dussartiellids); mandible palp well-developed (reduced in dussartiellids); gnathopod 2 dissimilar between sexes (similar in dussartiellids); uropod 3 inner ramus about as long as outer ramus (minute in dussartiellids).
Distribution. Madagascar.
Barnard, J. L. & Williams, W. D. (1995) The taxonomy of Amphipoda (Crustacea) from Australian fresh waters: Part 2. Records of the Australian Museum, 47, 161 - 201.
Bousfield, E. L. (1982) The amphipod superfamily Talitroidea in the northeastern Pacific region. 1. Family Talitridae: systematics and distributional ecology. National Museum of Natural Sciences (Ottawa), Publications in Biological Oceanography, 11, 1 - 73.
Bousfield, E. L. (1983) An updated phyletic classification and palaeohistory of the Amphipoda. In: F. R. Schram (Ed), Crustacean Phylogeny. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 257 - 277.
Fenwick, G. D. (2001) The freshwater Amphipoda (Crustacea) of New Zealand: a review. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 31, 341 - 363.
Holsinger, J. R, (1980) In Holsinger, J. R. & Longley, G. (1980) The subterranean amphipod crustacean fauna of an artesian well in Texas. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 308, 1 - 62.
Iannilli, V., Krapp, T. & Ruffo, S. (2011) Freshwater amphipods from Madagascar with description of a new familiy (sic), three new genera and six new species (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Bollettino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, 35, 93 - 137.
Koenemann, S. & Holsinger, J. R. (1999) Phylogenetic analysis of the amphipod family Bogidiellidae s. lat., and revision of taxa above the species level. Crustaceana, 72, 781 - 816.
Notenboom, J. (1986) Sensonator valentiensis n. g., n. sp. (Amphipoda) from different biotopes in southern Valencia. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde, 56, 60 - 74.
Ruffo, S. (1979) Studi sui crostacei anfipodi XC. Descrizione di due nuovi anoftalmi dell'Iran e del Madagascar (Phreatomelita paceae n. gen. n. sp., Dussartiella maegassa n. gen. n. sp.). Bollettino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, 6, 419 - 440.
Stock, J. H. (1985) Amsterdam Expeditions to the West Indian Islands, Report 47. Stygobiont amphipod crustaceans of the hadzioid group from Haiti. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde, 55, 331 - 426.
Stock, J. H. (1988) Stygofauna of the Canary Islands, 9. The amphipod genus Pseudoniphargus (Crustacea) in the Canary Islands. Bijdrapn tot de Dierkunde, 58 (1), 47 - 78.
Stock, J. H. & Iliffe, T. M. (1990) A new Australian crangonyctid amphipod with a habit convergent to the Old World genus Niphargus. Stygologia, 5, 137 - 142.
Stock, J. H. & Platvoet, D. (1991) The freshwater Amphipoda of the Falkland Islands. Journal of Natural History, 25, 1469 - 1491.
Williams, W. D. & Barnard, J. L. (1988) The taxonomy of crangonyctoid Amphipoda (Crustacea) from Australian fresh waters: foundation studies. Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement, 10, 1 - 180.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |