Thea lanceolata (Blume) Pierre var. stenophylla Merr., Enum. Philipp. Fl. Pl. 70 (1923).
Zhao, Dongwei, 2022, Typification of six names in Camellia (Theaceae), PhytoKeys 201, pp. 15-22 : 15
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.201.84699 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1CB2C3A9-391A-5C67-967E-49331CF8354C |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Thea lanceolata (Blume) Pierre var. stenophylla Merr., Enum. Philipp. Fl. Pl. 70 (1923). |
status |
|
4. Thea lanceolata (Blume) Pierre var. stenophylla Merr., Enum. Philipp. Fl. Pl. 70 (1923). View in CoL
Lectotype.
(designated here): Philippines. Luzon: Ilocos Norte Province, Bangui to Claveria, August 1918, M. Ramos 33005 (US 00113903 [the image is available at http://n2t.net/ark:/65665/34f38884f-74b3-4f15-8e0b-db0f884e39b1]!).
Notes.
Merrill (1923: 70) cited a single collection, " B.S. 33005 Ramos " in the protologue without specifying the corresponding herbarium. Two duplicates of this gathering were found at K and US, so they are syntypes (Art. 40 Note 1 of the ICN) of T. lanceolata var. stenophylla . The specimen at US bearing barcode 00113903 is selected above as the lectotype of this taxon because a fragment of fruit is attached on a branchlet of the sheet.
Due to a lack of materials, Sealy (1958: 145) did not give this variety a formal taxonomic treatment. Keng (1989: 68) identified it as a heterotypic synonym of C. lanceolata (Blume) Seem. and claimed that the latter was "understandably unlikely to be a homogeneous taxon" based on its widespread geographic distribution. I generally agree with Keng’s (1989) broad circumscription of C. lanceolata until more data are available (see below).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |