Spermophora kirinyaga, Bernhard A. Huber & Charles M. Warui, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2012.29 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:28503B8D-9B2C-484D-A7A2-B44D4DC04F6D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6181451 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FB6D5694-B829-49B4-B47E-AAB80C170389 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:FB6D5694-B829-49B4-B47E-AAB80C170389 |
treatment provided by |
Jeremy |
scientific name |
Spermophora kirinyaga |
status |
sp. nov. |
Spermophora kirinyaga View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:FB6D5694-B829-49B4-B47E-AAB80C 170389
Figs 10 View Figs 1 - 15. — 1 , 50-52 View Figs 50-69. — 50-52 , 102-106 View Figs 102 - 106
Spermophora Ken View in CoL 21: Dimitrov, Astrin & Huber 2012 (DNA sequence data).
Diagnosis
Easily distinguished from similar congeners ( S. berlandi Fage, 1936 , S. minotaura Berland, 1920 ) by absence of horns between eye triads; from S. berlandi Fage, 1936 also by absence of epigynal scape (only short conical projection; Fig. 105 View Figs 102 - 106 ), from S. minotaura Berland, 1920 also by unmodified clypeus; from both and from other species also by details of male palp morphology (shapes of bulbal processes and procursus; Figs 102, 103 View Figs 102 - 106 ) and male cheliceral armature ( Fig. 104 View Figs 102 - 106 ).
Etymology
Kirinyaga is a Kikuyu and Embu name for Mount Kenya; noun in apposition.
Type material
Holotype
♂, in ZFMK ( Ar 8762 ) GoogleMaps .
Paratypes
5 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀, in ZFMK (4 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀: Ar 8763 ) GoogleMaps and NMKE (1 ♂) GoogleMaps .
Type locality
KENYA, Eastern Province, Mt. Kenya National Park, Chogoria Forest , “site 2” GoogleMaps (0°14.2’S, 37°34.0’E), 1950 m a.s.l., under logs on ground, 27 Jan. 2010 (B.A. Huber).
Other material examined
KENYA: Eastern Province: 7 ♀♀, 1 juv. in pure ethanol, in ZFMK ( Ken 119 ), Mt. Kenya N.P., Chogoria Forest : same data as types above GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 2.2, carapace width 1.1. Leg 1: 17.1 (4.2 + 0.4 + 4.3 + 6.2 + 2.0), tibia 2: 2.6, tibia 3: 2.0, tibia 4: 2.6; tibia 1 L/d: 46. Distance PME-PME 205 µm, diameter PME 90 µm, distance PME-ALE 25 µm, no AME.
COLOR. Prosoma ochre with extensive black pattern including ocular area and clypeus, sternum mostly black, medially dark brown, legs ochre-yellow, darker subdistal rings and lighter tips barely visible, abdomen ochre-grey, largely covered with black marks, also ventrally.
BODY. Habitus as in Fig. 50 View Figs 50-69. — 50-52 ; ocular area slightly elevated, without horns; shallow but distinct thoracic furrow; clypeus unmodified. Chelicerae as in Fig. 104 View Figs 102 - 106 , with proximal lateral apophyses, large frontal apophyses (without modified hairs) and three long modified hairs on each side, the distal one accompanied by small black cone. Sternum wider than long (0.72/0.64), unmodified.
PALPS. As in Figs 102 and 103 View Figs 102 - 106 , coxa with retrolatero-ventral apophysis, trochanter with retrolateral apophysis, femur barely modified, procursus with ventral flap and several complex distal elements that appear hinged with proximal part, bulb with only one distally bifid process and small rounded projection on opposite side.
LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs, few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 14%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1, present on other tibiae; tarsus 1 with ~20 pseudosegments.
VARIATION. Tibia 1 in 5 other males: 3.9-4.0.
Female
In general similar to male but triads closer together (distance PME-PME 135 µm). Tibia 1 in 2 females: 3.4, 3.5. Epigynum a large protruding plate with small projection posteriorly ( Fig. 105 View Figs 102 - 106 ); internal genitalia as in Fig. 106 View Figs 102 - 106 .
Distribution
Known from type locality only ( Fig. 27 View Figs 24 - 27 ).
ZFMK |
Germany, Bonn, Zoologische Forschungsinstitut und Museum "Alexander Koenig" |
NMKE |
Kenya, Nairobi, National Museum of Kenya |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |