Monodechenella subtriangularis ( Engel & Morris 1984 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3926.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:342DDB94-4739-464B-AF67-4B17C6EE35D7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5623227 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1B76A233-D747-FFAE-A6C7-A57966E39BE1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Monodechenella subtriangularis ( Engel & Morris 1984 ) |
status |
|
Monodechenella subtriangularis ( Engel & Morris 1984)
1847 Phillipsia cf. gemmulifera McCoy, p. 231.
1984 Conophillipsia subtriangularis Engel & Morris; p. 39–41, figs. 10–11.
Holotype. AMF80518 (internal mould of cranidium).
Paratype material. From NU L353: AMF80519 (internal pygidium), AMF80520 (external pygidium), AMF80522 (external pygidium). From MUM: AMF80521 (internal pygidium). From DV: CSMF 10586a/b (internal/external pygidium).
Locality. Type—NU L353. Others—DV, MUM.
Emended diagnosis. Glabella tapers anteriorly; slightly incised at γ; S1 very distinct, S2 less distinct; strongly convex. Pygidium triangular in outline; concave pygidial border; 12+ pleural ribs; 14+ axial rings.
Remarks. There are few specimens of Monodechenella subtriangularis available for study, but they seem to closely resemble M. speciosa . Some of the distinguishing features between the two species noted by Engel & Morris (1984) appear to be dubious. For instance, there are a greater number of pygidiual rings and ribs in M. subtriangularis . The other distinguishing characters between M. subtriangularis and M. speciosa seem more obvious, that is the densely nodose ornament of M. speciosa , the different convexities of the pygidial borders and the more convex axis of the glabella in M. subtriangularis . We consider these differences sufficient to warrant the separation of these species.
MUM |
Micoteca da Universidade do Minho |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Proetoidea |
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Proetoidea |
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Proetoidea |
Family |
|
Genus |