Pachnoda acutipennis Kolbe, 1914

Serrano, Artur R. M., Capela, Rúben A., Nunes, Telmo & Santos, Carmen Van-Dú- Nem Neto, 2020, The rose chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) of Angola: a descriptive checklist with new records and synonymic notes, Zootaxa 4776 (1), pp. 1-130 : 26

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4776.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5A3743A2-9E64-45E8-920D-92C9ED9CAB5A

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3845329

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1B3C87AA-0008-FFFB-FF1D-FE6EFAC4FB4D

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Pachnoda acutipennis Kolbe, 1914
status

 

Pachnoda acutipennis Kolbe, 1914

( Figs. 3d, e, f View FIGURE 3 )

Distribution: ANG, DOC.

Distribution in Angola (Provinces): 1) LNO.

Historic records:

—Dundo (LNO) ( Gomes Alves 1973).

Material examined: Dundo (7º 22´S, 20º 50´E, 1470 m alt., 51) ( LNO), 2.V.1946, 1♀, Nº 651, Junta de Inves- tigações Coloniais (Entomologia), sub Pachnoda acutipennis Kolbe (Ruter det. 1968), IICT, MUHNAC GoogleMaps .

Remarks. The species is known from Katanga Province in DOC ( Rigout 1989; Sakai & Nagai 1998) and was given for the north-eastern LNO Province of Angola by Gomes Alves (1973) based on a determination of the same specimen by Ruter in 1968 (see Fig. 3 d View FIGURE 3 ). However, taking into account the elytral drawing pattern ( Fig. 3d View FIGURE 3 ) of the humeral region the specimen seems closer to one species within the group of Pachnoda viridiflua Kraatz, 1900 , P. spinipennis Moser, 1914 , P. allardi Ruter, 1969 , P. dargei Rigout, 1987 , P. knirschi Rigout, 1984 and P. pygidiomaculata Beinhundner, 2013 . Nevertheless does not belong to P. spinipennis as the pygidium is dull and has six white spots behind the front edge and two near the apical edge ( Moser 1914b), nor to P. allardi do to its larger length (19 mm vs 15–15.5 mm), different pygidial colour pattern, among other characters, nor to P. knirschi by the presence of four white dots on the upper green-blackish part of pygidium (none in P. knirschi ) (cf. Fig. 13 i View FIGURE 13 vs PII Fig. 6f View FIGURE 6 in Beinhundner 2013), nor to P. dargei by the orange tibia (black in dargei ) and a different pygidial pattern of white dots (cf. Fig. 3f View FIGURE 3 vs Fig. 4f View FIGURE 4 in Beinhundner 2013), nor even to P. pygidiomaculata by the absence of metasternum transverse white stripes and the presence of metatibial denticle (cf. Fig. 3e View FIGURE 3 vs Fig. 5b View FIGURE 5 in Beinhundner 2013). It could belong to P. viridiflua by the same general elytral colour pattern, the pygidium colour and the white spots pattern in the frontal half of this structure (e.g. see description of P. schultzei = P. viridiflua in Preiss 1933 ). However, without a male to check the genitalia it is with some caution and based again on the Ruter’s identification that we keep the species P. acutipennis for the Angolan fauna. Biological and ecological data are not available for this species.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Cetoniidae

Genus

Pachnoda

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF